Skip to main content

Abstract

Though change is often problematic and complicated by circumstance, and in the case of disaster profoundly damaging, it can also be an opportunity to improve otherwise intractable systemic problems. With that in mind, this chapter defines the nature of change as viewed through the lens of resilience and further outlines the relationship between resilience, adaptation, and transformation. Because change is often negative, strategies to build resilience are rationally directed towards coping with its consequences or resisting it outright. Similarly, because change is complicated, with many inter-connected parts, it is difficult to prepare for even when its causes are well understood. Most contemporary theories of resilience recognize the role of complexity, risk and vulnerability, but there is not yet a strong understanding of how to manage change as it impacts groups differently across scales, from local communities to regions, or even nations. The authors propose that resilience planning and theory can be improved by acknowledging the complexities of the adaptive cycle and panarchy in particular. The chapters of the book are offered as case studies and amplification of this idea, either in practice or in theory, from the perspective of multiple fields. The point of view is global, but includes informative chapters written by Japanese contributors who focus on the unprecedented change brought about by the 2011 Tohoku disaster in northern Japan. This perspective is often missing in such collections primarily because of the language barrier.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adger, W. N. (1999). Social Vulnerability To Climate Change And Extremes In Coastal Vietnam. World Development, 27(2), 249–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a new mordernity. London, Thousand Oaks. New Dehli: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Béné, C. et al. (2012). Resilience: New Utopia or New Tyranny? Reflection about the potentials and limits of the concept of resilience in relation to vulnerability reduction programmes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F. (2007). Understanding uncertainty and reducing vulnerability: Lessons from resilience thinking. Natural Hazards, 41(2), 283–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F., Colding, J., & Folke, C. (2003). Navigating social-ecological systems: Building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesbroek, G. R., Swart, R. J., & van der Knaap, W. G. M. (2009). The mitigation–adaptation dichotomy and the role of spatial planning. Habitat International, 33(3), 230–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, N. (2003). Vulnerability, risk and adaptation: A conceptual framework.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D. (2012). Analysing responses to climate change through the lens of reflexivity. The British Journal Of Sociology, 63(4), 616–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davoudi, S., et al. (2012). Resilience: A bridging concept or a dead end? Planning Theory & Practice, 13(2), 299–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke, C., et al. (2002). Resilience and sustainable development: Building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. Ambio, 31(5), 437–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke, C. et al. (2010). Resilience thinking: Integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecology and Society, 15(4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Guhan, S. (1994). Social security options for developing countries. International Labour Review, 133(1), 35–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, L. H. (2013). Ecological resilience—in theory and application. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 31(2000), 425–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, C. (1999). Crisis and the structural transformation of the state: Interrogating the process of change. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 1(3), 317–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C. S. (2001). Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems. Ecosystems, 4, 390–405.  

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C. S. (1973). Resilience and stability. Annual Review Of Ecological Systems, 4, 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ionescu, C., et al. (2009). Vulnerability to climate change. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 14(1), 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2012). Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation C. B. Field et al. (Eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, R., Schipper, E., & Dessai, S. (2005). Integrating mitigation and adaptation into climate and development policy: Three research questions. Environmental Science and Policy, 8(6), 579–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lei, Y., et al. (2013). Rethinking the relationships of vulnerability, resilience, and adaptation from a disaster risk perspective. Natural Hazards, 70(1), 609–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manson, S. M. (2001). Simplifying complexity: A review of complexity theory. Geoforum, 32(3), 405–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martens, P., McEvoy, D., & Chang, C. (2009). The climate change challenge: Linking vulnerability, adaptation, and mitigation. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 1(1), 14–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin-Breen, P. & Anderies, J. M. (2011). Resilience: A literature review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, F. et al. (2010). Resilience and vulnerability: Complementary or conflicting concepts? Ecology and Society, 15(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, D. R., Adger, W. N., & Brown, K. (2007). Adaptation to environmental change: Contributions of a resilience framework. The Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 32, 395–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, L. & Dale, A. (2005). Network structure, diversity, and proactive resilience building: A response to Tompkins and Adger. Ecology and Society, 10(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, S. E., et al. (2012). Informing adaptation responses to climate change through theories of transformation. Global Environmental Change, 22(1), 115–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelling, M. (2011). Adaptation to climate change: From resilience to transformation. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelling, M. (2012). Climate change and the crisis of capitalism: A chance to reclaim, self, society and nature. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pisano, U. (2012). Resilience and sustainable development: Theory of resilience, systems thinking and adaptive governance. ESDN Quarterly Report Number 26, September, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarlett, L. (2010). Climate change effects: The intersection of science, policy, and resource management in the USA. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 29(3), 892–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shalizi, Z., & Lecocq, F. (2009). To mitigate or to adapt: Is that the question? Observations on an appropriate response to the climate change challenge to development strategies. The World Bank Research Observer, 25(2), 295–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smit, B., et al. (2000). Anatomy of adaptation to climate change and variability. Climatic Change, 45(1), 223–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smit, B., & Wandel, J. (2006). Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 282–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Streets, D. G., & Glantz, M. H. (2000). Exploring the concept of climate surprise. Global Environmental Change, 10(2), 97–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sudmeier-Rieux, K. I. (2014). Resilience—an emerging paradigm of danger or of hope? Disaster Prevention and Management, 23(1), 67–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swart, R. J., & Raes, F. (2007). Making integration of adaptation and mitigation work: Mainstreaming into sustainable development policies? Climate Policy, 7, 288–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tompkins, E. L. & Adger, W. N. (2004). Does adaptive management of natural resources enhance resilience to climate change? Ecology And Society, 9(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, B., Holling, C., Carpenter, S., & Kinzig, A. (2004). Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social–ecological systems. Ecology and Society 9(2):5. Retrieved from http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss2/art5.

  • Walker, B. & Salt, D. (2006). Resilience thinking: Sustaining Ecosystems and people in a changing world. Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waller, M. A. (2001). Resilience in ecosystemic context: evolution of the concept. The American Journal Of Orthopsychiatry, 71(3), pp. 290–297.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wanglin Yan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Yan, W., Galloway, W. (2017). Understanding Change Through the Lens of Resilience. In: Yan, W., Galloway, W. (eds) Rethinking Resilience, Adaptation and Transformation in a Time of Change. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50171-0_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics