Skip to main content

Similarity Matching of Computer Science Unit Outlines in Higher Education

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
AI 2016: Advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 9992))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 3092 Accesses

Abstract

With the globalisation of education, students may undertake higher education courses anywhere in the world. Yet there is variation between different universities’ offerings. Even though web search engines can help one to locate potentially similar courses or subjects offered by different universities, judging the degree of similarity between each of them is currently a manual process in which a student or staff member has to go through subject/unit descriptions within a course to understand the different topics taught. In this paper, we study the application of text mining to evaluate the similarity or overlap between different units and propose a system that can help students and staff to make these judgements. The unit or course descriptions are generally short, containing 100–200 words, and exhibit very wide diversity in the ways they are written. Experimental results using data from Australian and international universities demonstrate the accuracy of the proposed system in calculating the similarity between different computing units.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The full list is available upon request.

References

  1. Bird, S.: NLTK: the natural language toolkit. In: Proceedings of the COLING/ACL on interactive presentation sessions, pp. 69–72. Association for Computational Linguistics (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Buckland, M.K., Gey, F.C.: The relationship between recall and precision. JASIS 45(1), 12–19 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Damashek, M., et al.: Gauging similarity with n-grams: language-independent categorization of text. Science 267(5199), 843–848 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fellbaum, C.: WordNet. Wiley Online Library (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Luan, J.: Data mining and knowledge management in higher education-potential applications (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Medelyan, O., Milne, D., Legg, C., Witten, I.H.: Mining meaning from Wikipedia. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 67(9), 716–754 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mihalcea, R., Corley, C., Strapparava, C.: Corpus-based and knowledge-based measures of text semantic similarity. In: AAAI, vol. 6, pp. 775–780 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Milne, D., Witten, I.: An open-source toolkit for mining Wikipedia. Artif. Intell. 194, 222–239 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Romero, C., Ventura, S.: Educational data mining: a review of the state of the art. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C Appl. Rev. 40(6), 601–618 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Salton, G., Wong, A., Yang, C.S.: A vector space model for automatic indexing. Commun. ACM 18(11), 613–620 (1975)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Tang, C., Lau, R.W., Li, Q., Yin, H., Li, T., Kilis, D.: Personalized courseware construction based on web data mining. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Web Information Systems Engineering, vol. 2, pp. 204–211. IEEE (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wikipedia: Main page (2015). https://en.wikipedia.org/

  13. Wu, Z., Palmer, M.: Verbs semantics and lexical selection. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 133–138. Association for Computational Linguistics (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang, L., Liu, X., Liu, X.: Personalized instructing recommendation system based on web mining. In: The 9th International Conference for Young Computer Scientists, 2008. ICYCS 2008, pp. 2517–2521. IEEE (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James Montgomery .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Langan, G., Montgomery, J., Garg, S. (2016). Similarity Matching of Computer Science Unit Outlines in Higher Education. In: Kang, B.H., Bai, Q. (eds) AI 2016: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. AI 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9992. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50127-7_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50127-7_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-50126-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-50127-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics