Advertisement

Participatory Planning in Organic Solid Waste Management: A Backcasting Approach

  • Roberta Sisto
  • Edgardo Sica
  • Mariarosaria Lombardi
  • Maurizio Prosperi
Chapter

Abstract

The valorisation of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW) represents a relevant matter for local governments that may result in significant economic and environmental benefits. In particular, defining the most cost-effective and environmentally friendly OFMSW management strategy should be based upon the active involvement of local stakeholders in order to allow policymakers to take into account all possible environmental, social, technological, and financial OFMSW-related problems. In this framework the present chapter aims at outlining a long-term management plan for OFMSW in the case of the south-eastern Italian municipality of Foggia. To this end we have employed an adapted participatory backcasting experiment based upon a double-step procedure. By means of a focus group with experts on OFMSW management issues at the municipal level, we firstly identified the desired end point and the relative expected obstacles and opportunities. These were then discussed during a workshop organised with a group of local stakeholders, who identified and proposed all possible actions to be carried out in the short, medium, and long term to reach the identified end point. Such a participatory approach should contribute to reducing the bounded rationality and the subjectivity affecting decision-making processes as well as to broaden the knowledge base and to achieve a greater transparency in the definition of OFMSW management strategies.

Keywords

Waste management Participatory approach Long-Term strategy 

References

  1. Albanna M (2013) Anaerobic digestion of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste. In: Malik A, Grohmann E, Alves M (eds) Management of microbial resources in the environment. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  2. Antunes P, Santos R, Videira N (2006) Participatory decision-making for sustainable development—the use of mediated modelling techniques. Land Use Policy 23:44–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Atrigna M, Canditelli M, Faustini N, Pescheta G (2010) La gestione della frazione umida/biodegradabile dei rifiuti urbani. Available on website at: http://old.enea.it/produzione_scientifica/pdf_EAI/2010/5/GestioneUmidoRifiuti.pdf. Retrieved on: 03 Dec 2015
  4. Börjeson L, Höjer M, Dreborg KH, Ekvall T, Finnveden G (2006) Scenario types and techniques: towards a user’s guide. Futures 38:723–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bovino C (2014) Rifiuti e Imballaggi. Manuale Ambiente 2014 a cura di: AA.VV, Milanofiori Assago (MI), IPSOA, 393–558Google Scholar
  6. Carlsson-Kanyama A, Dreborg KH, Moll HC, Padovan D (2008) Participative backcasting: a tool for involving stakeholders in local sustainability planning. Futures 40:34–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ciceri G (RSE) (2012) The waste resource in Italy—IEA task 36. Available on our website at: http://www.ieabioenergytask36.org/vbulletin/attachment.php?attachmentid=302&d=1362675836. Retrieved on: 15 Dec 2015
  8. Costello R, Finnell J (1998) Institutional opportunities and constraints to biomass development. Biomass Bioenergy 15:201–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. DG Internal Policies of the Union Policy—Department: Economic and Scientific Policy (2006) Status of implementation of EU Environmental Laws in Italy, IP/A/ENVI/IC/2006-183. Available on website at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/etudes/join/2006/375865/IPOL-ENVI_ET(2006)375865_EN.pdf. Retrieved on: 15 Dec 2015
  10. Dreborg KH (1996) Essence of backcasting. Futures 28:813–828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. European Commission (2011) Communication from the commission to the European parliament, the council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions, Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe, Brussels, 20 Sept 2011, COM(2011) 571 finalGoogle Scholar
  12. European Environmental Agency (EEA) (2013) Managing municipal solid waste—a review of achievements in 32 European countries. EEA report, no. 2/2013, Copenhagen, 2013. ISSN 1725-9177. doi: 10.2800/71424
  13. European Union (1999) Council Directive 1999/31/EC of 26 April 1999 on the landfill of waste, OJ L 182, 16 July 1999, pp 1–19Google Scholar
  14. European Union (2008) Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives, OJ L 312, 22 Nov 2008, pp 3–30Google Scholar
  15. Giordano R, Passarella G, Uricchio VF, Vurro M (2005) Fuzzy cognitive maps for issue identification in a water resources conflict resolution system. Phys Chem Earth 30:463–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hagemann N, Gawel E, Purkus A, Pannicke N, Hauck J (2016) Possible futures towards a wood-based bioeconomy: a scenario analysis for Germany. Sustainability 8:98. doi: 10.3390/su8010098
  17. Höjer M, Mattson LG (2000) Determinism and backcasting in future studies. Futures 32(7):613–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. International Energy Agency (2003) Energy to 2050. Scenarios for a sustainable future. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  19. Kok K, van Vliet M, Barlund I, Dubel A, Sendzimir J (2011) Combining participative backcasting and exploratory scenario development: experiences from the SCENES project. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 78:835–851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lamb G, Fountain L (2010) An investigation into food waste management. Waste in action. http://www.actiondechets.fr/upload/medias/group_b_report_compressed.pdf. Retrieved on 10 Feb 2016
  21. Lopolito A, Nardone G, Prosperi M, Sisto R, Stasi A (2011) Modeling the bio refinery industry in rural areas: a participatory approach for policy options comparison. Ecol Econ 72:18–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Macias-Corral M, Samani Z, Hanson A, Smith G, Funk P, Yu H, Longworth J (2008) Anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste and agricultural waste and the effect of co-digestion with dairy cow manure. Bioresour Technol 99(17):8288–8293. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.03.057. Epub 14 May 2008
  23. McCormick K, Kaberger T (2007) Key barriers for bioenergy in Europe: economic conditions, know-how and institutional capacity, and supply chain coordination. Biomass Bioenergy 31:443–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Miller KI, Monge PR (1986) Participation, satisfaction, and productivity: a meta-analytic review. Acad Manag J 29(4):727–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Patel M, Kok K, Rothman DS (2007) Participatory scenario construction in land use analysis: an insight into the experiences created by stakeholder involvement in the Northern Mediterranean. Land Use Policy 24:546–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Placentino CM, Bruno E, Busetti F, Lacarbonara F, Gramegna D, Blonda M, Assennato G (ARPA PUGLIA) (2013) Management of urban biodegradable waste in Puglia: features and crtitical issues in Italian context. In: e-Proceedings of international conference on biochars, composts, and digestates. Production, characterization, regulation, marketing, uses and environmental impact (BCD 2013), 17–20 Oct 2013. Old Central Post Office Building, Bari, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  27. Presidente della Repubblica (1997) Decreto Legislativo 5 febbraio 1997, n. 22, ‘Attuazione delle direttive 91/156/CEE sui rifiuti, 91/689/CEE sui rifiuti pericolosi e 94/62/CE sugli imballaggi e sui rifiuti di imballaggio’, Gazzetta Ufficiale n. 38 del 15 febbraio 1997Google Scholar
  28. Presidente della Repubblica (2003) Decreto Legislativo 13 gennaio 2003, n. 36, Attuazione della Direttiva 1999/31/CE relativa alle discariche di rifiuti, Gazzetta Ufficiale n.59 del 12-3-2003 - Suppl. Ordinario n. 40Google Scholar
  29. Presidente della Repubblica (2006) Decreto Legislativo 3 aprile 2006, n. 152, ‘Norme in Materia Ambientale, Gazzetta Ufficiale n. 88 del 14 aprile 2006Google Scholar
  30. Presidente della Repubblica (2010) Decreto Legislativo 3 dicembre 2010, n. 205, ‘Disposizioni di attuazione della Direttiva 2008/98/CE del Parlamento europeo e del Consiglio del 19 novembre 2008 relativa ai rifiuti e che abroga alcune direttive’, Gazzetta Ufficiale n. 288 del 10 dicembre 2010Google Scholar
  31. Priess JA, Hauck J (2014) Integrative scenario development. Ecol Soc 19(1):12. doi: 10.5751/ES-06168-190112 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Quist J, Vergragt P (2006) Past and future of backcasting: the shift to stakeholder participation and a proposal for a methodological framework. Futures 38:1027–1045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Reichel A, Ferraris M, Paleari S (2013) Municipal waste management in Italy. EEA (European Environmental Agency). Available on website at: https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/managing-municipal-solid-waste/italy-municipal-waste-management. Retrieved on: 15 Dec 2015
  34. Robinson J (2003) Future subjunctive: backcasting as social learning. Futures 35:839–856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Roos A, Graham RL, Hektor B, Rakos C (1999) Critical factors to bioenergy implementation. Biomass Bioenergy 17:113–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rosch C, Kaltschmitt M (1999) Energy from biomass: do non-technical barriers prevent an increased use? Biomass Bioenergy 16:347–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Salter J, Robinson J, Wiek A (2010) Participatory methods of integrated assessment—a review. Adv Rev 1:697–717 (Sept/Oct 2010)Google Scholar
  38. Sisto R, van Vliet M, Prosperi M (2015) Puzzling stakeholder views for long-term planning in the bio-economy: a back-casting application. Futures. doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2015.04.002
  39. Smith RL, Sengupta D, Takkellapatia S, Lee CC (2015) An industrial ecology approach to municipal solid waste management: II. Case studies for recovering energy from the organic fraction of MSW. Resour Conserv Recycl 104(2015):317–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Snakin JP, Muilu T, Pesola T (2010) Bioenergy decision-making of farms in Northern Finland: combining the bottom-up and top-down perspectives. Energy Policy. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.06.002 Google Scholar
  41. SPI (Sustainable Process Improvement) http://www.sustainableprocessimprovement.co.uk/about-spi/. Retrieved on 18 Feb 2016
  42. Svenfelt A, Engstrom R, Svane O (2011) Decreasing energy use in buildings by 50% by 2050. A backcasting study using stakeholder groups. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 78:785–796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Thrupp LA, Cabarle B, Zazueta A (1994) Participatory methods in planning & political processes: linking the grassroots & policies for sustainable development. Agric Hum Values 11(2–3):77–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. van Asselt MBA, Rijkens-Klomp N (2002) A look in the mirror: reflection on participation in integrated assessment from a methodological perspective. Glob Environ Change 12:167–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. van Vliet M, Kok K (2015) Combining backcasting and exploratory scenarios to develop robust water strategies in face of uncertain futures. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 20:43–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Vismara R, Malpei F, Centemero M (2010) Biogas da rifiuti solidi urbani. Palermo, Dario Flaccovio SrlGoogle Scholar
  47. Webler T, Tuler S (2002) Unlocking the puzzle of public participation. Bull Sci Technol Soc (22):179. doi: 10.1177/02767602022003002. url:http://bst.sagepub.com/content/22/3/179

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roberta Sisto
    • 1
  • Edgardo Sica
    • 1
  • Mariarosaria Lombardi
    • 1
  • Maurizio Prosperi
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Economics and Star*Energy GroupUniversity of FoggiaFoggiaItaly
  2. 2.Department of the Sciences of Agriculture, Food, and EnvironmentUniversity of FoggiaFoggiaItaly

Personalised recommendations