Defining the Meaning of Food Waste as a Matter of Urgency

  • Monica Delsignore
  • Margherita Ramajoli
  • Carola Ricci
Chapter

Abstract

The lack of a uniform definition of waste worldwide applies to food waste as well. International organizations (including regional integration organization as the EU) and State governments refer to different definitions. In the International perspective, policy and definition of food waste have been traditionally developed by the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO), with the explicit intent to struggle world hunger. Nonetheless, the same initial goal of combatting global food insecurity has been changing recently adding a new perspective to the traditional narrow concept, brought in by sustainability and its broad interpretation including the circular economy target, contained in the 2015 post-Global Millennium Development Goals. The challenge is offering the chance for a clear definition, distinguishing the European framework from the International context only on the basis of the specific scope of such a peculiar Regional Integration Organization. This Article aims to demonstrate that the European definition of food waste has been targeting so far, as for the legislative perspective, the specific goal of environmental impact reduction, which is just one of the numerous aims identified within the International legal framework. The National systems in the European context ask for an unambiguous definition in order to measure and estimate in a credible, practical and consistent manner the extent of loss and waste and to identify where the loss and waste occur. A precise definition will enable countries, companies and other organizations to take sustainable decisions and program their investments. Having a clear and consistent legal framework will certainly assist businesses and regulators to make decisions on a more certain basis. That is a key factor in order to achieve the ambitious target of the circular economy. In the European Union system, there is no specific definition of food waste under the Waste Framework Directive (WFD, No 2008/98/EC). The previous Directive (No 75/442/EEC) containing a definition was amended in 1991 with the addition of “categories of waste” (Annex I) and the omission of any reference to national law.  A lack of legal clarity under EU law regarding the distinction between waste and non-waste could hinder the efficient use of by-products. That is why the European Parliament has recently called on the EU Commission to develop guidance on the implementation of Article 5 of the WFD which defines by-products. The distinction between waste, by products and end of waste is a key issue in the Circular Economy Package and would also help in raising awareness among food industries, retailers and consumers.

Keywords

Food waste Food loss Circular economy 

References

  1. Abels G, Kobusch A, Trasch J (2014) Scientific regulatory cooperation within the EU: on the relationship between EFSA and national food authorities. In: Alemanno A, Gabbi S (eds) Foundations of EU food law and policy. Ten years of the European food safety authority. Ashgate Publishing LimitedGoogle Scholar
  2. Aginam O (2006) Food safety, South-North asymmetries and the clash of regulatory regimes. (2006/07) VJTL 40.4:1099–1111Google Scholar
  3. Albisinni F (2014) Food law and innovation in European Law. In: Studi in onore di Luigi Costato, vol II. Napoli, p 3Google Scholar
  4. Allena M, Fracchia F (2011) Globalization, environment and sustainable development, in global, European and Italian perspectives. Riv It Dir Pubbl Com 781Google Scholar
  5. Baldwin R, Cave M, Lodge M (2012) Understanding regulation, theory, strategy and practice. Oxford, p 373Google Scholar
  6. Bell S (1999) Refining the definition of waste. 1 ELR 2, 283Google Scholar
  7. Bruno F (2010) Environmental issues in food law. In: Studi in onore di Luigi Costato, vol II. Napoli 2014, p 115Google Scholar
  8. Cheyne I (2002) The definition of waste in EC law. 14 JEL 1 61Google Scholar
  9. Chyau J (2009) Casting a global safety net—a framework for food safety in the age of globalization. FDLJ 64, 313 et seqGoogle Scholar
  10. Craig P, de Burca G (2007) General editors’ preface. In: Wenneras P (ed) The enforcement of EC environmental law, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  11. Davies PGG (2004) European Union Environmental Law. Ashgate, An Introduction to Key Selected Issues 217Google Scholar
  12. de Sadeleer N (2014) EU Environmental law and the internal market. OxfordGoogle Scholar
  13. Dell’Anno P (2013) Disciplina della gestione dei rifiuti. In: Trattato di diritto dell’ambiente vol II. Padova, pp 162, 179–180Google Scholar
  14. FAO Statistics Division (1981) Food loss prevention in perishable crops. FAO Agric Serv Bull no. 43Google Scholar
  15. FAO (2002) Post-harvest losses: discovering the full story. Overview of the phenomenon of losses during the post-harvest system. FAO, Agro Industries and Post-Harvest Management Service, RomeGoogle Scholar
  16. Fracchia F (2010) Lo sviluppo sostenibile, La voce flebile dell’altro tra protezione dell’ambiente e tutela della specie umana. NapoliGoogle Scholar
  17. Gonzalez Vaqué L (2015) Food loss and waste in the European Union: a new challenge for the food law? Eur Food Feed Law Rev 20Google Scholar
  18. Gustavsson J, Cederberg C, Sonesson U, van Otterdijk R, Meybeck A (2011) Global food losses and food waste. Extent, causes, prevention. RomeGoogle Scholar
  19. Corvellec H (2015) New directions for management and organization studies on waste, GRI-rapport 2015: 3, Managing Big CitiesGoogle Scholar
  20. Jans JH, Vedder HHB (2012) European environmental law. European Law Publishing, p 476Google Scholar
  21. Keele H (2001) When does waste cease to be waste. 12 ELR 1, 3Google Scholar
  22. Kramer L (2003) The distinction between product and waste in community law. 2 Env Liab 1:3Google Scholar
  23. Lundqvist J, de Fraiture C, Molden D (2008) Saving water: from field to fork—curbing losses and wastage in the food chain, in SIWI Policy Brief. StockholmGoogle Scholar
  24. Mariani, MT (2007) The intersection of international law, agricultural biotechnology, and infectious disease. Leiden-BostonGoogle Scholar
  25. Negri S (2009) Food safety and global health: an international law perspective. Glob Health J III.1, 1 et seqGoogle Scholar
  26. Parfitt J, Barthel M, Macnaughton S (2010) Food waste within food supply chains: quantification and potential for change to 2050. Philos Trans R Soc B 365:3065–3081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pocklington D (2011) The law of waste management. Sweet and Maxell, LondonGoogle Scholar
  28. Pope Francis (2015) Encyclical letter ‘Laudato Si’ of the Holy Father Francis on Care of Our Common Home’, 24 May 2015, points 20–22Google Scholar
  29. Poto M (2008) Regulations on food safety and the role of African actors in the global arena. J Afr Int Law I.1:107–130Google Scholar
  30. Ricci C (2013) International law as a meta-framework to protect the right to food. In: Lupone A, Ricci C, Santini A (eds) The right to food toward a global governance. Torino, p 9 et seqGoogle Scholar
  31. Sunstein CR, Reisch LA (2014) Automatically green: behavioral economics and environmental protection (September 19, 2013). Harvard Environ Law Rev 38(1)Google Scholar
  32. Snyder F (2006) Toward an international law for adequate food. In: Mahiou A, Snyder F (eds) La sécurité alimentaire/food security and food safety. Leiden-Boston, p 79 et seqGoogle Scholar
  33. Tromans (2001) EC waste law—a complete mess? 13(2) JEL 133Google Scholar
  34. van der Meulen B (2010) The global arena of food law: emerging contours of a meta-framework. Erasmus L Rev 3.4, 217 et seqGoogle Scholar
  35. UN (United Nations) (2015) Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Resolution adopted by the general assembly on 25 A/RES/70/1. United Nations, GenevaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Monica Delsignore
    • 1
  • Margherita Ramajoli
    • 1
  • Carola Ricci
    • 2
  1. 1.School of LawUniversità Degli Studi Di Milano-BicoccaMilanoItaly
  2. 2.Department of Political and Social SciencesUniversità Degli Studi Di PaviaPaviaItaly

Personalised recommendations