Abstract
The transition to a carbon neutral and resource smart society is perhaps the largest societal transformation of our time. There is an urgent need to develop scalable solutions, which help individuals lead sustainable lives and radically reduce ecological footprints. The promising news is that there is a whole new branch of startups, small and medium-sized enterprises (SME’s) and also larger companies creating new solutions to these challenges. We call these ‘smartups’. Recently, smartups have emerged to provide new products and services particularly in the areas of housing, mobility and food. These three essential sectors are where most of our household material footprint originates from as well as the majority of monthly expenses. Therefore, solutions are needed dissolve the link, even a dependency, between the majority of household consumption and the root causes of emissions. Smartups are able to solve this dependency by providing cheaper, better and more ecological solutions in the areas that we spend most of our money in the first place.
This article explains what smartups are, focusing on their business models and what is needed to make them successful. We introduce two promising smartups in the food sector from Finland and analyse the reasons for their potential and success. We find that globally emerging smartups will only be successful if their added value is based both on making individual lives easier, happier and more comfortable while simultaneously enabling the transition to an ecologically sound lifestyle. Smartups can disrupt markets and create new ones, but the growth of the industry is dependent on determined support. Thus, we suggest that one of the best ways to support the development of smart concepts is to create strategic partnerships between smartups and the existing large companies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bio Intelligence Service (2010) Preparatory study on food waste across EU 27. European Commission. doi:10.2779/85947
EVU (2016) European vegetarian union. http://v-label.eu. Accessed 15 Nov 2016
Faber J, Schroten A, Bles M, Sevenster M, Markowska A, Smit M, Rohde C, Dütschke E, Köhler J, Gigli M, Zimmermann K, Soboh R, Van ‘t Riet J (2012) Behavioural climate change mitigation options and their appropriate inclusion in quantitative longer term policy scenarios – main report. In: DG Climate action contract. CE Delft. Available via CE Delft. http://www.cedelft.eu/publicatie/behavioural_climate_change_mitigation_options_and_their_appropriate_inclusion_in_quantitative_longer_term_policy_scenarios/1290. Accessed 16 Dec 2016
Fiala N (2008) Meeting the demand: an estimation of potential future greenhouse gas emissions from meat production. Ecol Econ 67(3):412–419
Gerstberger C, Yaneva D (2013) Analysis of EU-27 household final consumption expenditure. In: Statistics in focus 2/2013. Eurostat. Available via Eurostat. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Archive:Household_consumption_expenditure_-_national_accounts. Accessed 17 Nov 2016
Gustavsson J, Cederberg C, Sonesson U, Van Otterdijk R, Meybeck A (2011) Global food losses and food waste – extent, causes and prevention. In: SAVE FOOD. FAO. Available via: FAO. http://www.fao.org/docrep/014/mb060e/mb060e.pdf. Accessed 15 Nov 2016
Hamel G, Prahalad CK (1996) Competing for the future. Harvard Business School Press, Bosto
Hart CW, Heskett JL, Sasser WE (1990) The profitable art of service recovery. Harv Bus Rev 68(4):148–156
Helsinki D (2016) Peloton club accelerator. http://pelotonclub.me. Accessed 01 Nov 2016
Kim WC, Mauborgne R (2005) Blue ocean strategy: from theory to practice. Calif Manag Rev 47(3):103–121
Ritola M, Annala M, Hulkkonen S, Lahtinen V, Lätti R, Noponen E, Mäkelä K, Mizera R, Neuvonen A, Hietaniemi J, Mokka R (2014) Cleantech takes over consumer markets. In: Study about the potential of Finnish consumer cleantech in global markets. Tekes. Available via Demos Helsinki. http://www.demoshelsinki.fi/en/julkaisut/cleantech-takes-over-consumer-markets/. Accessed 15 Nov 2016
Short SW, Bocken NMP, Barlow CY, Chertow MR (2014) From refining sugar to growing tomatoes. J Ind Ecol 18(5):603–618
Stenmark Å, Jensen C, Quested T, Moates G (2016) Estimates of European food waste levels. In: Reducing food waste through social innovation. FUSIONS. Available via FUSIONS. http://www.eu-fusions.org/phocadownload/Publications/Estimates%20of%20European%20food%20waste%20levels.pdf. Accessed 15 Nov 2016
Tubiello FN, Salvatore M, Cóndor Golec RD, Ferrara A, Rossi S, Biancalani R, Federici S, Jacobs H, Flammini A (2014) Agriculture, forestry and other land use emissions by sources and removals by sinks. In: 1990–2011 analysis. FAO statistics division. Available via FAO. http://www.fao.org/docrep/019/i3671e/i3671e.pdf. Accessed 15 Nov 2016
United Nations (2015) Paris agreement. UN framework convention on climate change, Paris. http://unfccc.int/files/essential_background/convention/application/pdf/english_paris_agreement.pdf. Accessed 15 Nov 2016
Worldwatch Institute (2014) Peak meat production strains land and water resources. Ecos 199:27–28
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kaskinen, T., Lähteenoja, S., Sokero, M., Suomela, I. (2018). Strategic Business Examples from Finland: The Growth of the Smartup Industry. In: Lehmann, H. (eds) Factor X. Eco-Efficiency in Industry and Science, vol 32. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50079-9_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50079-9_22
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-50078-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-50079-9
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)