Abstract
The construct of metacognitive knowledge—that is knowledge on cognitive processes, was established as a determinant of cognitive development in the 1970s. Early research focused on the domain of memory development in pre- and primary school children. While research activities on metacognition have diversified over time, some core issues in the assessment, structure, and development of metacognitive knowledge still remain unresolved:
(1) How can metacognitive knowledge be assessed? (2) How does metacognitive knowledge develop in secondary school? (3) Is metacognitive knowledge domain-specific or domain-general? (4) To what extent are developmental changes in metacognitive knowledge and achievement interrelated?
We addressed these research questions within our longitudinal research project on the development of knowledge components. Our database included 928 German students who were tested on six measurement points (from Grades 5 to 9). The focus of the longitudinal study was on the assessment of metacognitive knowledge, as well as achievement in mathematics, reading comprehension, English as a foreign language, and the changes in these variables over time. In this chapter, the main results on these four research questions are presented, after a brief description of the historical research background. The results of the last assessment period are given special emphasis.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
It should be noted that the elementary school period in the German school system finishes at the end of Grade 4. From Grade 5 on, students are allocated to three educational tracks: high = academic, intermediate, and low = vocational, mainly based on achievement scores in primary school.
References
Alexander, J. M., Carr, M., & Schwanenflugel, P. (1995). Development of metacognition in gifted children: Directions for future research. Developmental Review, 15, 1–37. doi:10.1006/drev.1995.1001.
Artelt, C. (2000). Strategisches Lernen [Strategic learning]. Münster: Waxmann.
Artelt, C., & Schneider, W. (2015). Cross-country generalizability of the role of metacognitive knowledge for students’ strategy use and reading competence. Teachers College Record, 117 (online publication).
Artelt, C., Schiefele, U., & Schneider, W. (2001). Predictors of reading literacy. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 16, 363–383. doi:10.1007/BF03173188.
Artelt, C., Beinicke, A., Schlagmüller, M., & Schneider, W. (2009). Diagnose von Strategiewissen beim Textverstehen [Diagnosis of strategy knowledge about text comprehension]. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 41, 96–103.
Artelt, C., Naumann, J., & Schneider, W. (2010). Lesemotivation und Lernstrategien [Motivation for reading and learning strategies]. In E. Klieme, C. Artelt, J. Hartig, N. Jude, O. Köller, M. Prenzel, et al. (Eds.), PISA 2009. Bilanz nach einem Jahrzehnt (pp. 73–112). Münster: Waxmann.
Artelt, C., Neuenhaus, N., Lingel, K., & Schneider, W. (2012). Entwicklung und wechselseitige Effekte von metakognitiven und bereichsspezifischen Wissenskomponenten in der Sekundarstufe [Development of metacognitive and domain-specific knowledge and their mutual effects in secondary school]. Psychologische Rundschau, 63, 18–25. doi:10.1026/0033-3042/a000106.
Becker, M., Lüdtke, O., Trautwein, U., Köller, O., & Baumert, J. (2012). The differential effects of school tracking on psychometric intelligence: Do academic-track schools make students smarter? Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 682–699. doi:10.1037/a0027608.
Borkowski, J. G., Milstead, M., & Hale, C. (1988). Components of children’s metamemory: Implications for strategy generalization. In F. E. Weinert & M. Perlmutter (Eds.), Memory development: Universal changes and individual differences (pp. 73–100). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Brown, A. L. (1978). Knowing when, where and how to remember: A problem of metacognition. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (pp. 77–165). New York: Halsted.
Brown, A. L., Bransford, J. D., Ferrara, R. A., & Campione, J. C. (1983). Learning, remembering, and understanding. In J. H. Flavell & M. E. Markman (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 3: Cognitive development (pp. 77–166). New York: Wiley.
Campione, J. C., & Armbruster, B. B. (1985). Acquiring information from texts: An analysis of four approaches. Thinking and learning skills. In J. W. Segal, S. F. Chipman, & R. Glaser (Eds.), Thinking and learning skills (pp. 317–359). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Carr, M., & Jessup, D. L. (1997). Gender differences in first-grade mathematics strategy use: Social and metacognitive influences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 318–328. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.89.2.318.
Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. New York: Psychology Press.
Flavell, J. H. (1971). First discussant’s comments: What is memory development the development of? Human Development, 14, 272–278. doi:10.1159/000271221.
Flavell, J. H. (2000). Development of children’s knowledge about the mental world. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 24, 15–23. doi:10.1080/016502500383421.
Flavell, J. H., & Wellman, H. M. (1977). Metamemory. In R. V. Kail & W. Hagen (Eds.), Perspectives on the development of memory and cognition (pp. 3–33). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Flavell, J. H., Miller, P. H., & Miller, S. A. (2002). Cognitive development (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
Hacker, D. J., Dunlosky, J., & Graesser, A. C. (2009). Handbook of metacognition in education. New York: Routledge.
Heller, K., & Perleth, C. (2000). Kognitiver Fähigkeitstest für 4. bis 12. Klassen [Cognitive ability test for Grades 4–12], Revision (KFT 4–12+R). Göttingen: Beltz.
Jacobs, J. E., & Paris, S. G. (1987). Children’s metacognition about reading: Issues in definition, measurement, and instruction. Educational Psychologist, 22, 255–278. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2203&4_4.
Joyner, M., & Kurtz-Costes, B. E. (1997). Metamemory development. In N. Cowan (Ed.), The development of memory in childhood (pp. 275–300). Hove: Psychology Press.
Kuhn, D. (2000). The theory of mind, metacognition and reasoning: A life-span perspective. In P. Mitchell & K. J. Riggs (Eds.), Children’s reasoning and the mind (pp. 301–326). Hove: Psychology Press.
Leopold, C., & Leutner, D. (2002). Der Einsatz von Lernstrategien in einer konkreten Lernsituation bei Schülern unterschiedlicher Jahrgangsstufen [The use of learning strategies in a specific learning situation by students of different grade levels]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, Beiheft, 45, 240–258.
Lind, G., & Sandmann, A. (2003). Lernstrategien und Domänenwissen [Learning strategies and knowledge about domains]. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 211, 171–192. doi:10.1026//0044-3409.211.4.171.
Lingel, K. (2014). Metakognitives Wissen Mathematik: Entwicklung und Zusammenhang mit der Mathematikleistung in der Sekundarstufe I. [Metacognitive knowledge about mathematics: Its development and its relation to math performance in secondary school] (Doctoral dissertation, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Würzburg). Retrieved from https://opus.bibliothek.uni-wuerzburg.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/7280. Accessed 13 Jan 2016.
Lingel, K., Neuenhaus, N., Artelt, C., & Schneider, W. (2010). Metakognitives Wissen in der Sekundarstufe: Konstruktion und Evaluation domänenspezifischer Messverfahren [Metacognitive knowledge in secondary school: On the construction and evaluation of domain-specific measurement instruments]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, Beiheft, 56, 228–238.
Lingel, K., Götz, L., Artelt, C., & Schneider, W. (2014a). Mathematisches Strategiewissen für 5. und 6. Klassen [Test of mathematics-related strategy knowledge for Grades 5 and 6; MAESTRA 5–6+]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Lingel, K., Neuenhaus, N., Artelt, C., & Schneider, W. (2014b). Der Einfluss des metakognitiven Wissens auf die Entwicklung der Mathematikleistung am Beginn der Sekundarstufe I [Effects of metacognitive knowledge on the development of math achievement at the beginning of secondary school]. Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik, 35, 49–77. doi:10.1007/s13138-013-0061-2.
Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (2002). Statistical analysis with missing data. Hoboken: Wiley.
Muis, K. R., Winne, P. H., & Jamieson-Noel, D. (2007). Using a multitrait-multimethod analysis to examine conceptual similarities of three self-regulated learning inventories. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 177–195. doi:10.1348/000709905X90876.
Neuenhaus, N. (2011). Metakognition und Leistung: Eine Längsschnittuntersuchung in den Bereichen Lesen und Englisch bei Schülerinnen und Schülern der fünften und sechsten Jahrgangsstufe [Metacognition and achievements: A longitudinal study assessing reading and English language development in fifth and sixth grade students] (Doctoral dissertation, Otto-Friedrich-Universität Bamberg, Bamberg, Germany. Retrieved from https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-bamberg/files/327/DissNeuenhausseA2.pdf. Accessed 13 Jan 2016.
Neuenhaus, N., Artelt, C., Lingel, K., & Schneider, W. (2011). Fifth graders metacognitive knowledge: General or domain specific? European Journal of Psychology of Education, 26, 163–178. doi:10.1007/s10212-010-0040-7.
Neuenhaus, N., Artelt, C., & Schneider, W. (2016) Lernstrategiewissen im Bereich Englisch: Entwicklung und erste Validierung eines Tests für Schülerinnen und Schüler der frühen Sekundarstufe [Learning strategies in the subject of English: Development and first validation of a test for secondary school students]. Diagnostica. doi:10.1026/0012-1924/a000171.
Neuenhaus, N., Artelt, C., & Schneider, W. (2013, April). The development of metacognitive knowledge among secondary-level students from Grade 5 to Grade 9: Do gender and educational track matter? Paper presented at the annual meeting of AERA, San Francisco.
Paris, S. G., & Byrnes, J. P. (1989). The constructivist approach to self-regulation and learning in the classroom. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research and practice (pp. 169–200). New York: Springer.
Pfost, M., Artelt, C., & Weinert, S. (Eds.). (2013). The development of reading literacy from early childhood to adolescence: Empirical findings from the Bamberg BiKS Longitudinal Studies. Bamberg: University of Bamberg Press.
Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801–813. doi:10.1177/0013164493053003024.
Pressley, M., Borkowski, J. G., & Schneider, W. (1989). Good information processing: What it is and how education can promote it. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 857–867. doi:10.1016/0883-0355(89)90069-4.
Schlagmüller, M., & Schneider, W. (2007). WLST-12. Würzburger Lesestrategie Wissenstest für die Klassen 7 bis 12 [Würzburg reading strategy knowledge test for Grades 7–12]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Schneider, W. (2008). The development of metacognitive knowledge in children and adolescents: Major trends and implications for education. Mind, Brain, and Education, 2, 114–121. doi:10.1111/j.1751-228X.2008.00041.x.
Schneider, W. (2010). Memory development in childhood and adolescence. In U. Goswami (Ed.), The Blackwell handbook of cognitive development (pp. 347–376). London: Blackwell.
Schneider, W. (2015). Memory development from early childhood through emerging adulthood. New York: Springer.
Schneider, W., & Artelt, C. (2010). Metacognition and mathematics education. ZDM Mathematics Education, 42, 149–161. doi:10.1007/s11858-010-0240-2.
Schneider, W., & Lockl, K. (2008). Procedural metacognition in children: Evidence for developmental trends. In J. Dunlosky & B. Bjork (Eds.), A handbook of memory and metacognition (pp. 391–409). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Schneider, W., & Pressley, M. (1997). Memory development between two and twenty. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Schraw, G. (2000). Assessing metacognition: Implications for the Buros Symposium. In G. Schraw & J. C. Impara (Eds.), Issues in the measurement of metacognition (pp. 297–322). Lincoln: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.
Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 460–475. doi:10.1006/ceps.1994.1033.
Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review, 7, 351–371. doi:10.1007/BF02212307.
Veenman, M. V. J., van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1, 3–14. doi:10.1007/s11409-006-6893-0.
Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277–304). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Acknowledgments
The preparation of this chapter was supported by grant SCHN 315/36 and AR 310/8 from the German Research Foundation (DFG) in the Priority Program “Competence Models for Assessing Individual Learning Outcomes and Evaluating Educational Processes” (SPP 1293).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schneider, W., Lingel, K., Artelt, C., Neuenhaus, N. (2017). Metacognitive Knowledge in Secondary School Students: Assessment, Structure, and Developmental Change. In: Leutner, D., Fleischer, J., Grünkorn, J., Klieme, E. (eds) Competence Assessment in Education. Methodology of Educational Measurement and Assessment. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50030-0_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50030-0_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-50028-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-50030-0
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)