Abstract
Teaching and learning from texts with integrated pictures are challenging tasks for teachers and students. Nevertheless, this kind of material is universal in secondary school as well as in elementary school and holds huge potential for student learning, if instruction and presentation are appropriate. The project “BiTe” investigates teachers’ and students’ competencies in secondary and elementary school. This chapter focuses on components of teachers’ competence in the specific field of Picture-Text-Integration (PTI), embracing teachers’ knowledge as well as their attitudes, motivation, and self-related cognitions. Also, teachers’ judgment accuracy is investigated, as especially relevant for judging students’ competencies and the level of difficulty of teaching materials. Regarding the outcomes of teachers’ competencies, instructional quality and students’ engagement are described.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ainsworth, S. (2006). DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 16, 183–198. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.03.001.
Ayres, P., & Sweller, J. (2005). The split-attention principle in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 135–146). Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.
Blömeke, S. (2011). Forschung zur Lehrerbildung im internationalen Vergleich [Research on teacher education in an international comparison]. In E. Terhart, H. Bennewitz, & M. Rothland (Eds.), Handbuch der Forschung zum Lehrerberuf (pp. 345–361). Münster: Waxmann.
Good, T. L. (1979). Teacher effectiveness in the elementary school. Journal of Teacher Education, 30(2), 52–64. doi:10.1177/002248717903000220.
Hattie, J., & Anderman, E. M. (2013). International guide to student achievement. Educational psychology handbook series. New York: Routledge.
Helmke, A. (2009). Unterrichtsqualität und Lehrerprofessionalität: Diagnose, Evaluation und Verbesserung des Unterrichts [Quality of instruction and teacher professionalism: Diagnosis, evaluation and improvement of teaching] (1st ed.). Seelze-Velber: Kallmeyer.
Klassen, R. M., & Chiu, M. M. (2010). Effects on teachers' self-efficacy and job satisfaction: Teacher gender, years of experience, and job stress. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 741–756.
Klieme, E., & Rakoczy, K. (2008). Empirische Unterrichtsforschung und Fachdidaktik. Outcome-orientierte Messung und Prozessqualität des Unterrichts [Empirical clasroom research and didactics. Outcome-oriented measurement and process quality of teaching]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 54, 222–237.
Kunter, M., Klusmann, U., Baumert, J., Richter, D., Voss, T., & Hachfeld, A. (2013). Professional competence of teachers: Effects on instructional quality and student development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 805–820. doi:10.1037/a0032583.
Lipowsky, F. (2004). Was macht Fortbildungen für Lehrkräfte erfolgreich [What makes teacher trainings successful]? Die Deutsche Schule, 96, 462–479.
Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
McElvany, N., & Willems, A. S. (2012). Videobasiertes Fortbildungsmodul zur Bild-Text-Integration [Video-based teacher training for picture-text-integration]. Schule NRW: Amtsblatt des Ministeriums für Schule und Weiterbildung, 64, 68–71.
McElvany, N., Schroeder, S., Hachfeld, A., Baumert, J., Richter, T., Schnotz, W., et al. (2009). Diagnostische Fähigkeiten von Lehrkräften bei der Einschätzung von Schülerleistungen und Aufgabenschwierigkeiten bei Lernmedien mit instruktionalen Bildern [Teachers’ diagnostic skills in estimating student achievement and task difficulty for learning material with instructional pictures]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 23, 223–235.
McElvany, N., Schroeder, S., Baumert, J., Schnotz, W., Horz, H., & Ullrich, M. (2012). Cognitively demanding learning materials with texts and instructional pictures: Teachers’ diagnostic skills, pedagogical beliefs and motivation. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 27, 403–420. doi:10.1007/s10212-011-0078-1.
Oerke, B., McElvany, N., Ohle, A., Ullrich, M., & Horz, H. (2015). Verbessert sich die diagnostische Urteilsgenauigkeit von Lehrkräften bei längerem Kontakt mit der Klasse [Do teachers’ diagnostic skills improve with increasing duration of teacher-student contact]? Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 63(1), 34.
Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62, 307–332. doi:10.2307/1170741.
Schnotz, W., & Bannert, M. (2003). Construction and interference in learning from multiple representation. Learning and Instruction, 13, 141–156. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00017-8.
Schnotz, W., Wagner, I., Zhao, F., Ullrich, M., Horz, H., McElvany, N., et al. (2017). Development of dynamic usage of strategies for integrating text and picture information in secondary schools. In D. Leutner, J. Fleischer, J. Grünkorn, & E. Klieme (Eds.), Competence assessment in education: Research, models and instruments (pp. 303–313). Berlin: Springer.
Schroeder, S., Richter, T., McElvany, N., Hachfeld, A., Baumert, J., Schnotz, W., et al. (2011). Teachers’ beliefs, instructional behaviors, and students’ engagement in learning from texts with instructional pictures. Learning and Instruction, 21, 403–415. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.06.001.
Tschannen-Moran, M., Woolfolk Hoy, A., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68, 202–248. doi:10.3102/00346543068002202.
Vogt, F., & Rogalla, M. (2009). Developing adaptive teaching competency through coaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 1051–1060. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.04.002.
Acknowledgments
The preparation of this chapter was supported by grants to Jürgen Baumert (BA 1461/7-1, BA 1461/8-1), Wolfgang Schnotz (SCHN 665/3-1, SCHN 665/5-1) and Nele McElvany (MC 67/7-2), from the German Research Foundation (DFG) in the Priority Program “Competence Models for Assessing Individual Learning Outcomes and Evaluating Educational Processes” (SPP 1293).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ohle, A. et al. (2017). Development and Evaluation of a Competence Model for Teaching Integrative Processing of Texts and Pictures (BiTe). In: Leutner, D., Fleischer, J., Grünkorn, J., Klieme, E. (eds) Competence Assessment in Education. Methodology of Educational Measurement and Assessment. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50030-0_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50030-0_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-50028-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-50030-0
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)