Abstract
In the conclusion, I argue that when courts apply the Fourth or Fifth Amendment to neuroimaging, they should focus not only on measuring the intrusion that use of this technology creates in a particular instance, but at how use of it might affect individuals’ sense of privacy in their mental lives more generally, If privacy of thought is to continue to serve, in Isaiah Berlin’s words, as an “inner citadel,” then constitutional safeguards should prevent it from being technologically breached not only in cases where the breach would reveal mental content that courts regard as particularly intimate or sensitive, but in all circumstances where the government lacks very powerful reasons for its intrusion.
References
Berlin, I. (1966). Two Concepts of Liberty. Oxford, UK: Oxford, Clarendon Press.
Farahany, N. A. (2012b). Searching Secrets. Pennsylvania Law Review, 160, 1239–1308.
Stoller, S. E., & Wolpe, P. R. (2007). Emerging Technologies for Lie Detection and the Fifth Amendment. American Journal of Law and Medicine, 33(2/3), 359–374.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Blitz, M.J. (2017). Conclusion. In: Searching Minds by Scanning Brains. Palgrave Studies in Law, Neuroscience, and Human Behavior. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50004-1_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50004-1_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-50003-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-50004-1
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)