Advertisement

Lie Detection, Mind Reading, and Brain Reading

  • Marc Jonathan Blitz
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Law, Neuroscience, and Human Behavior book series (PASTLNHB)

Abstract

This chapter briefly looks at the ways that those in the mid-to-late twentieth-century developed lie-detection techniques without neuroimaging – and how various neuroimaging techniques promise more sophisticated types of lie detection. It also very briefly explains how different neuroimaging technologies – such as EEF, fMRI, and fNIR – work, and how they might evolve into more sophisticated – and invasive – techniques in the future, and how law enforcement use of them may thus raise privacy concerns (and do so, even in cases that at first seem free of substantial privacy harms).

Keywords

Electroencepholography EEG Functional magnetic resonance imaging fMRI fNIR Guilty knowledge Lie detection 

References

  1. Strange Days: Lightstorm Entertainment/20th Century Fox (1995).Google Scholar
  2. Adelstein, J. S., Shehzad, Z., Mennes, M., DeYoung, C. G., Zuo, X.-N., et al. (2011). Personality is Reflected in the Brain’s Intrinsic Functional Architecture. Plos ONE, 6(11), e27633. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0027633.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Alder, K. (2007). Lie Detectors: The History of an American Obsession. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  4. Allen, R. J., & Mace, K. M. (2004). The Self-Incrimination Clause Explained and Its Future Predicted. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 94, 243–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ayaz, H., et al. (2011). Suite and Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy to Study Learning in Spatial Navigation. Journal of Visualized Experiments, 56, e3443. doi:  10.3791/3443.Google Scholar
  6. Battaglia, M., Ogliari, A., Zanoni, A., Citterio, A., Pozzoli, U., Giorda, R., Maffei, C., & Marino, C. (2005). Influence of the Serotonin Transporter Promoter Gene and Shyness on Children’s Cerebral Responses to Facial Expressions. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62(1), 85–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Brandom, R. (2015, February 12). Is ‘Brain Fingerprinting’ a Breakthrough or a Sham? The Verge. http://www.theverge.com/2015/2/2/7951549/brain-fingerprinting-technology-unproven-courtroom-science-farwell-p300.
  8. Buzsaki, G. (2006). Rhythms of the Brain. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carmel, D., Dayan, E., Naveh, A., Raveh, O., & Ben Shakhar, G. (2003). Estimating the Validity of the Guilty Knowledge Test From Simulated Experiments: The External Validity of Mock Crime Studies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 9(4), 261–269.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Chadwick, M. J., et al. (2010). Decoding Individual Episodic Memory Traces in the Human Hippocampus. Current Biology, 20(6), 544–547.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Committee to Review the Scientific Evidence on the Polygraph, National Research Council, The Polygraph and Lie Detection. (2003). The Polygraph and Lie Detection. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  12. Cowen, A. S., Chun, M., & Kuhl, B. (2014). Neural Portraits of Perception: Reconstructing Face Images From Evoked Brain Activity. Neuroimage, 94, 12–22.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Farah, M. J., Smith, M. E., Gawuga, C., Lindsell, D., & Foster, D. (2010). Brain Imaging and Brain Privacy: A Realistic Concern? Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(1), 119–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Farwell, L. (2012). Brain Fingerprinting: A Comprehensive Tutorial Review of Detection of Concealed Information with Event-Related Brain Potential. Cognitive Neurodynamics, 6, 115–154.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Fox, D. (2008). Will Memory Detection Technologies Transform Criminal Justice in the United States? Brain Imaging and the Bill of Rights. American Journal of Biethics, 8(1), 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gamer, M., Klimecki, O., Bauermann, T., Stoeter, P., & Vossel, G. (2012). fMRI-Activation Patterns in the Detection of Concealed Information Rely on Memory-Related Effects. SCAN, 7, 506–515.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hughes, V. (2014, September 30). The Other Polygraph. National Geographic: Phenomena. http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/2014/09/30/the-other-polygraph/.
  18. Jones, O. D., Buckholtz, J. W., Schal, J. D., & Marois, R. (2009). Brain Imaging for Legal Thinkers: A Guide for the Perplexed. Stanford Technology Law Reviews, 2009, 1–47.Google Scholar
  19. Langleben, D. D., Schroeder, L., Maldjian, J. A., Gur, R. C., McDonald, S., Ragland, J. D., & Childress, A. R. (2002). Brain Activity During Simulated Deception: An Event-Related Functional Magnetic Resonance Study. NeuroImage, 15, 727–732.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Langleben, D. T., & Moriarty, J. C. (2013, May 1). Using Brain Imaging for Lie Detection: Where Science, Law, and Policy Collide. Psychology Public Policy Law, 19(2), 222–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lee, T. M., Liu, H. L., Tan, L. H., Chan, C. C., Mahankali, S., Feng, C. M., Hou, J., Fox, P. T., & Gao, J. H. (2002, March). Lie Detection by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Human Brain Mapping, 15(3), 157–164.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Lykken, D. T. (1959). The GSR in the Detection of Guilt. Journal of Applied Psychology, 43(6), 385–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nishimoto, S. et al. (2010). Reconstructing Visual Experiences from Brain Activity Evoked by Natural Movies. Current Biology, 21, 1641–1646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sahakian, B. J., & Gottwald, J. (2017). Sex, Lies, and Brain Scans: How fMRI Reveals What Really Goes on in our Minds. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Seung, S. (2012). Connectome: How the Brain’s Wiring Makes Us Who We Are. New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  26. Shen, F. X. (2013). Neuroscience, Mental Privacy and the Law. Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, 36, 653–713.Google Scholar
  27. Shen, F. X. (2016). Neurolegislation: How U.S. Legislators Are Using Brain Science. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 29, 495–526.Google Scholar
  28. Shinkareva, S. V. et al. (2008). Using fMRI Brain Activation to Identify Cognitive States Associated with Perception of Tools and Dwellings. Plos ONE, 3(1), e1394. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0001394.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Smith, K. (2013, October 13). By Scanning People’s Brain Activity, Scientists May Be Able to Decode People’s Thoughts, Their Dreams, Even Their Intentions. Nature, 502, 428–430.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Snead, O. C. (2007). Neuroimaging and the “Complexity” of Capital Punishment. New York University Law Review, 82, 1265–1339.Google Scholar
  31. Spence, S. (2004). A Cognitive Neurobiological Account of Deception: Evidence from Functional Neuroimaging. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 359(1451), 1755–1762. PMC. Web. 5 Sept. 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Stoller, S. E., & Wolpe, P. R. (2007). Emerging Technologies for Lie Detection and the Fifth Amendment. American Journal of Law and Medicine, 33(2/3), 359–374.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Sur, S., & Sinha, V. K. (2009, Jan–Jun). Event Related Potential: An Overview. Industrial Psychiatry Journal, 18(1), 70–73.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Ward, J. (2010). Student’s Guide to Cognitive Neuroscience (2nd edn.). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  35. Wolpaw, J., & Wolpaw, E. W. (2012). Brain-Computer Interfaces: Principles and Practice. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Yuhas, D. (2012, June 12). What’s a Voxel and What Can It Tell Us? A Primer on fMR. Scientific American Blog. http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/whats-a-voxel-and-what-can-it-tell-us-a-primer-on-fmri/.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marc Jonathan Blitz
    • 1
  1. 1.Oklahoma City University School of LawOklahoma CityUSA

Personalised recommendations