Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

GIS and the Power of Geographical Thinking

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Power of Geographical Thinking

Part of the book series: International Perspectives on Geographical Education ((IPGE))

Abstract

This chapter addresses the question: What are the ramifications for geographical thinking of teaching and learning through GIS in both its more traditional guise and ‘new GIS’? Volunteered geographic information (VGI) is a common element of this ‘new’ GIS and whilst the constructivist enquiry-based model still remains centre stage in its use in education, teachers are beginning to experiment with new ways of using GI particularly through earth viewers and data collected ‘on the fly’. The chapter begins by discussing the types of geographical knowledge that can be constructed in GIS and the types of geographical thinking that can result from these. The discussion then considers critical responses to GIS and the ways in which geography knowledge can be constructed through it. In the light of recent changes to GIS and the development of a broader array of related geospatial technologies, there follows a discussion of new geospatial technologies and their implications for teachers and educators of using these to develop geographical thinking. The chapter concludes by looking at the role of public participatory GIS in promoting deeper geographical thinking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bednarz, R. S., & Bednarz, S. W. (2004). Geography education: The glass is half full and it’s getting fuller. The Professional Geographer, 56(1), 22–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M., & Knopp, L. (2008). Queering the map: The productive tensions of colliding epistemologies. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 98(1), 40–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crampton, J. W. (2009). Cartography: Maps 2.0. Progress in Human Geography, 33(1), 91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crampton, J. W., & Krygier, J. (2005). ‘An introduction to critical cartography.’ ACME: An International E-journal for Critical Geographies, 4(1), 11–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crutcher, M., & Zook, M. (2009). Placemarks and waterlines: Racialized cyberscapes in post-Katrina Google Earth. Geoforum, 40(4), 523–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodge, M., & Perkins, C. (2009). The ‘view from nowhere’? Spatial politics and cultural significance of high-resolution satellite imagery. Geoforum, 40(4), 497–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doering, A., & Valetsianos, G. (2008). An investigation of the use of real-time, authentic geospatial data in the K–12 classroom. Journal of Geography, 106(6), 217–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, C. E. (2007). Participatory GIS—a people’s GIS? Progress in Human Geography, 31(5), 616–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elwood, S. (2002). GIS use in community planning: A multi-dimensional analysis of empowerment. Environment and Planning A, 34(5), 905–922.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elwood, S. (2009). Geographic information science: New geovisualization technologies—emerging questions and linkages with GiScience research. Progress in Human Geography, 33(2), 256–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fargher, M. (2013). Geographic Information (GI)—How could it be used? In D. Lambert & M. Jones (Eds.), Debates in geography education. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Favier, T., & van der Schee., J. (2012). Exploring the characteristics of an optimal design for inquiry-based geography education with geographic information systems. Computers & Education, 58, 666–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freundschuh, S. M., & Egenhofer, M. J. (1997). Human conceptions of spaces: Implications for GIS. Transactions of GIS, 2(4), 361–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelernter, D. (1992). Mirror Worlds, or, the day software puts the universe in a shoebox: How it will happen and what it will mean. USA: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golledge, R. G., & Stimson, R. J. (1997). Spatial behaviour: A geographical perspective. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, R. A., & Moore, G. (1973). The development of spatial cognition: A review. In R. M. Downs & D. Stea (Eds.), Image and Environment. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingsbury, P., & Jones, J. P., III. (2009). Walter Benjamin’s Dionysian adventures on Google Earth. Geoforum, 40(4), 502–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwan, M. P. (2002). Is GIS for women? Reflections on the critical discourse in the 1990s. Gender, Place and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography, 9(3), 271–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwan, M. P. (2007). Affecting geospatial technologies: Toward a feminist politics of emotion. The Professional Geographer, 59(1), 22–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lake, R. W. (1993). Planning and applied geography: Positivism, ethics, and geographic information systems. Progress in Human Geography, 17(3), 404–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leszczynski, A. (2009). Quantitative limits to qualitative engagements: GIS, its critics, and the philosophical divide. The Professional Geographer, 61(3), 350–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malone, L., Palmer, A. M., Voigt, C. L., Napoleon, E., Feaster, L. (2005). Mapping our world : GIS lessons for educators. Redlands: ESRI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mark, D. M. (1993). ‘Human spatial cognition’. In D. Medyckyj-Scott & H. M. Hearnshaw (Eds.), Human factors in geographic information systems. London: Belhaven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. (2005). For space Sage. Thousand Oaks CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall, M. K., & Minang, P. A. (2005). Assessing participatory GIS for community-based natural resource management: Claiming community forests in Cameroon. The Geographical Journal, 171(4), 340–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milson, A. J., Demirci, A., & Kerski, J. J. (Eds.). (2012). International perspectives on teaching and learning with GIS in secondary schools. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2006). Learning to think spatially: GIS as a support system in the K–12 curriculum. Washington, D.C: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan, D. (2006). Geographical information systems: Critical GIS. Progress in Human Geography, 30(6), 783–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parks, L. (2009). Digging into Google Earth: An analysis of “Crisis in Darfur”. Geoforum, 40(4), 535–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavlovskya, M. (2006). Theorising with GIS: A tool for critical geographies. Environment and Planning A, 38(11), 2003–2020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickles, J. (1995). Representations in an electronic age: Geography, GIS, and democracy. In J. Pickles (Ed.), Ground truth: The social implications of geographic information systems. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickles, J. (2006). Ground Truth 1995–2005. Transactions in GIS, 10(5), 763–772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhind, D. (1992). The information infrastructure of GIS. In Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling (Vol. 1, pp. 1–19). Columbia, SC, USA: Humanities and Social Sciences Computing Lab, University of South Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuurman, N. (2000). Trouble in the heartland: GIS and its critics in the 1990s. Progress in Human Geography, 24(4), 569–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuurman, N. (2006). Formalization matters: Critical GIS and ontology research. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 96(4), 726–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sieber, R. E. (2007). Spatial data access by the grassroots. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 34(1), 47–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sui, D. Z. (1994). GIS and urban studies: Positivism, post-positivism, and beyond. Urban Geography, 15(3), 258–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tulloch, D. L. (2007). Many, many maps: Empowerment and online participatory mapping: http://www.firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/viewArticle/1620/1535. Last accessed 28th October, 2013.

  • Tversky, B., Bauer Morrison, J., Franklin, N., & Bryant, D. J. (1999). Three spaces of spatial cognition. The Professional Geographer, 51(4), 516–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worldfish. (2013). Fisheries rehabilitation in post-tsunami Aceh: Issues & recommendations from a National Consultative Workshop. NAGA, WorldFish Center Quarterly (29), 3 & 4, Jul-Dec 2006. Available at: http://www.worldfishcenter.org/search/node/tsunami%20. Last accessed on 28th October, 2013.

  • Zook, M. A., & Graham, M. (2007). The creative reconstruction of the internet: Google and the privatization of cyberspace and digiplace. Geoforum, 38(6), 1322–1343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. UCL, Institute of Education, London, UK

    Mary Fargher

Authors
  1. Mary Fargher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mary Fargher .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. UCL Institute of Education , London, United Kingdom

    Clare Brooks

  2. School of Education, Faculty of Humanities and Social Science, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, United Kingdom

    Graham Butt

  3. UCL Institute of Education , London, United Kingdom

    Mary Fargher

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fargher, M. (2017). GIS and the Power of Geographical Thinking. In: Brooks, C., Butt, G., Fargher, M. (eds) The Power of Geographical Thinking. International Perspectives on Geographical Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49986-4_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49986-4_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-49985-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-49986-4

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation