Abstract
For almost 150 years, the capacitor (discovered in 1745), the resistor (1827) and the inductor (1831) have been the only fundamental passive devices known and have formed the trinity of fundamental passive circuit elements, which, together with transistors , form the basis of all existing electronic devices and systems. There are only a few fundamental components and each of them performs its own characteristic function that is unique amongst the family of basic components. For example, capacitors store energy in an electric field, inductors store energy in a magnetic field, resistors dissipate electrical energy, and transistors act as switches and amplify electrical energy. It then happened in 1971 when Leon Chua , a professor of electrical engineering at the University of Berkeley , postulated the existence of a fourth fundamental passive circuit element, the memristor (Chua in IEEE Transactions on Circuit Theory 18(5):507–519, 1971). Chua suggested that this fourth device, which was only hypothetical at that point, must exist to complete the conceptual symmetry with the resistor, capacitor and inductor in respect of the four fundamental circuit variables such as voltage, current, charge and flux. He proved theoretically that the behaviour of the memristor could not be substituted by a combination of the other three circuit elements, hence that the memristor a truly fundamental device. This chapter is about the remarkable discovery of the “fourth fundamental passive circuit element”, the memristor. Its name is an amalgamation of the words “memory” and “resistor”, due to the memristor’s properties to act as a resistor with memory. Since the memristor belongs to the family of passive circuit elements, these will be focused here.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abdalla, H., & Pickett, M. (2011). Spice modeling of memristors. In IEEE international symposium on circuits and systems (ISCAS) (pp. 1832–1835). IEEE.
Adee, S. (2008). The mysterious memristor. IEEE Spectrum.
Biolek, D., Biolek, Z., & Biolkova, V. (2011). Pinched hysteretic loops of ideal memristors, memcapacitors and meminductors must be self-crossing. Electronic Letters, 47(25), 1385–1387.
Borghetti, J. (2009). ‘Memristive’ switches enable ‘stateful’ logic operations via material implication. Nature, 464, 873–875.
Chua, L. (1971). Memristor—the missing circuit element. IEEE Transactions on Circuit Theory, 18(5), 507–519.
Chua, L. (2011). Resistance switching memories are memristors. Journal of Applied Physics, 102(4), 765–783.
Chua, L. O. (2012). The fourth element. Proceedings of the IEEE, 100(6), 1920–1927.
Chua, L., & Kang, M. (1976). Memristive devices and systems. Proceedings of the IEEE, 64(2), 209–223.
Chua, L. O., & Yang, L. (1988). Cellular neural networks: Theory. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II, 35(10), 1257–1272.
Corinto, F., Kang, S. M., & Ascoli, A. (2013). Memristor-based neural circuits. In IEEE international symposium on circuits and systems (ISCAS) (pp. 1832–1835). IEEE.
Eshraghian, K., Kavehei, O., Cho, K. R., Chappell, J., Iqbal, A., Al-Sarawi, S., et al. (2012). Memristive device fundamentals and modeling: Applications to circuits and systems simulation. Proceedings of the IEEE, 100(6), 1991–2007.
EU. (2016). Human Brain Project (HBP). https://www.humanbrainproject.eu/. Accessed 2016.
Finelli, L. A., Haney, S., Bazhenov, M., Stopfer, M., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2008). Synaptic learning rules and sparse coding in a model sensory system. PLoS Computational Biology, 4(4), e1000062.
Gaillardon, P. E., Ben-Jamaa, M. H., Beneventi, G. B., Clermidy, F., Perniola, L. (2010). Emerging memory technologies for reconfigurable routing in FPGA architecture. In 17th IEEE international conference on electronics, circuits, and systems (ICECS) (pp. 62–65). IEEE.
Gerstner, W., Kempter, R., van Hemmen, J. L., Wagner, H. (1996). A neuronal learning rule for sub-millisecond temporal coding. Nature 383(LCN-ARTICLE-1996-002), 76–78.
Gerstner, W., Ritz, R., & Van Hemmen, J. L. (1993). Why spikes? Hebbian learning and retrieval of time-resolved excitation patterns. Biological Cybernetics, 69(5–6), 503–515.
IBM. (2016a). True North. http://www.re-search.ibm.com/articles/brain-chip.shtml. Accessed 2016.
IBM. (2016b). Watson. http://www.ibm.com/watson/. Accessed 2016.
Kazi, I., Meinerzhagen, P., Gaillardon, P. E., Sacchetto, D., Burg, A., De Micheli, G. (2013). A ReRAM-based non-volatile flip-flop with sub-V T read and CMOS voltage-compatible write. In IEEE 11th international on new circuits and systems conference (NEWCAS), 2013 (pp. 1–4). IEEE.
Lehtonen, E., Poikonen, J., Laiho, M., Lu, W. (2011). Time-dependence of the threshold voltage in memristive devices. In IEEE international symposium on circuits and systems (ISCAS) (pp. 2245–2248). IEEE.
Linares-Barranco, B., & Serrano-Gotarredona, T. (2009). Memristance can explain spike-time-dependent-plasticity in neural synapses. Nature Proceedings Online 40(3), 163–173.
Linn, E., Rosezin, R., Kügeler, C., & Waser, R. (2010). Complementary resistive switches for passive nanocrossbar memories. Nature Materials, 9, 403–406.
Pediain. (2013). Memristor seminar report. Tech. rep., EEE Department. http://pediain.com/seminar/Memristor-Seminar-report-pdf-ppt.php
Pershin, Y., & Di Ventra, M. (2010). Writing to and reading from a nano-scale crossbar memory based on memristors. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I, 57(8), 1857–1864.
Pershin, Y., & Di Ventra, M. (2011). Memory effects in complex materials and nanoscale systems. Applied Physics, 60(2), 145–227.
Pickett, M., Strukov, D., Borghetti, J., Yang, J., Snider, G., Stewart, D., et al. (2009). Switching dynamics in titanium dioxide memristive devices. Journal of Applied Physics, 106(7), 074508.
Rosaka, T., & Chua, L. (1993). The CNN universal machine: An analogic array computer. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II, 40(3), 163–173.
Serrano-Gotarredona, T., Masquelier, T., Prodromakis, T., Indiveri, G., & Linares-Barranco, B. (2013). STDP and STDP variations with memristors for spiking neuromorphic learning systems. Frontiers in Neuroscience 7(2).
Shin, S., Kim, K., & Kang, S. M. (2011). Reconfigurable stateful NOR gate for large-scale logic array integrations. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II, 58(7), 442–446.
Snider, G. (2007). Self-organized computation with unreliable, memristive nanodevices. Nanotechnology, 18(36), 365202.
Strukov, D. B., Snider, G. S., Stewart, D. R., & Williams, R. S. (2008). The missing memristor found. Nature, 453, 80–83.
Tanachutiwat, S., Liu, M., & Wang, W. (2011). FPGA Based on Integration of CMOS and RRAM. IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems, 19(11), 2023–2032.
Tetzlaff, R. (2014). Memristors and memristive systems. New York: Springer.
Trefzer, M. A., & Tyrrell, A. M. (2015). Evolvable hardware: From practice to application. Berlin: Springer.
Vontobel, P., Robinett, W., Kuekes, P., Stewart, D., Straznicky, J., & Williams, R. (2009). Writing to and reading from a nano-scale crossbar memory based on memristors. Nanotechnology, 20(42), 1–21.
Wikipedia. (2016). Memristor. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memristor. Accessed May, 12, 2016, 14:36 h.
Williams, S. (2008). How we found the missing memristor. IEEE Spectrum.
Williams, S. (2011). A short history of memristor development. Tech. rep., HP Labs. http://regmedia.co.uk/2011/12/22/hpmemristorhistory.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Trefzer, M.A. (2017). Memristor in a Nutshell. In: Miranda, E. (eds) Guide to Unconventional Computing for Music. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49881-2_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49881-2_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-49880-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-49881-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)