Skip to main content

A Bounded Model Checker for Three-Valued Abstractions of Concurrent Software Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Formal Methods: Foundations and Applications (SBMF 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 10090))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We present a technique for verifying concurrent software systems via SAT-based bounded model checking. It is based on a direct transfer of the system and an LTL property into a formula that encodes the corresponding model checking problem. In our approach we first employ three-valued abstraction. The state space of the resulting abstract system is then logically encoded, which saves us the expensive construction of an explicit state space model. The verification result can be obtained via two SAT checks. Our work includes the definition of the encoding and a theorem which states that the SAT result for an encoded verification task is equivalent to the result of the corresponding model checking problem. We also introduce an extension of the encoding by fairness constraints, which facilitates the verification of liveness properties. We have implemented our technique in an automatic verification tool that supports bounded LTL model checking under fairness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Completeness thresholds for checking safety properties are linear in the size of the abstraction, i.e. in the number of abstract states [7].

References

  1. Biere, A., Cimatti, A., Clarke, E.M., Strichman, O., Zhu, Y.: Bounded model checking. Handb. Satisf. 185, 457–481 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bruns, G., Godefroid, P.: Model checking partial state spaces with 3-valued temporal logics. In: Halbwachs, N., Peled, D. (eds.) CAV 1999. LNCS, vol. 1633, pp. 274–287. Springer, Heidelberg (1999). doi:10.1007/3-540-48683-6_25

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Cimatti, A., Clarke, E., Giunchiglia, F., Roveri, M.: NuSMV: a new symbolic model checker. Int. J. Softw. Tools Technol. Transf. 2(4), 410–425 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Fitting, M.: Kleene’s 3-valued logics and their children. Fund. Inf. 20(1–3), 113–131 (1994)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Grumberg, O.: 3-valued abstraction for (bounded) model checking. In: Liu, Z., Ravn, A.P. (eds.) ATVA 2009. LNCS, vol. 5799, p. 21. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-04761-9_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Ivančić, F., Yang, Z., Ganai, M.K., Gupta, A., Shlyakhter, I., Ashar, P.: F-Soft: software verification platform. In: Etessami, K., Rajamani, S.K. (eds.) CAV 2005. LNCS, vol. 3576, pp. 301–306. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). doi:10.1007/11513988_31

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Kroening, D., Ouaknine, J., Strichman, O., Wahl, T., Worrell, J.: Linear completeness thresholds for bounded model checking. In: Gopalakrishnan, G., Qadeer, S. (eds.) CAV 2011. LNCS, vol. 6806, pp. 557–572. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-22110-1_44

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Kroening, D., Tautschnig, M.: CBMC – C bounded model checker. In: Ábrahám, E., Havelund, K. (eds.) TACAS 2014. LNCS, vol. 8413, pp. 389–391. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-54862-8_26

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Le Berre, D., Parrain, A.: The Sat4j library, release 2.2. J. Satisf. Boolean Model. Comput. 7, 59–64 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rabinovitz, I., Grumberg, O.: Bounded model checking of concurrent programs. In: Etessami, K., Rajamani, S.K. (eds.) CAV 2005. LNCS, vol. 3576, pp. 82–97. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). doi:10.1007/11513988_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Schrieb, J., Wehrheim, H., Wonisch, D.: Three-valued spotlight abstractions. In: Cavalcanti, A., Dams, D.R. (eds.) FM 2009. LNCS, vol. 5850, pp. 106–122. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-05089-3_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Shoham, S., Grumberg, O.: 3-valued abstraction: more precision at less cost. Inf. Comput. 206(11), 1313–1333 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Timm, N.: Bounded model checking für partielle systeme. Master’s thesis, University of Paderborn (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Timm, N., Wehrheim, H.: On symmetries and spotlights – verifying parameterised systems. In: Dong, J.S., Zhu, H. (eds.) ICFEM 2010. LNCS, vol. 6447, pp. 534–548. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-16901-4_35

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Timm, N., Wehrheim, H., Czech, M.: Heuristic-guided abstraction refinement for concurrent systems. In: Aoki, T., Taguchi, K. (eds.) ICFEM 2012. LNCS, vol. 7635, pp. 348–363. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-34281-3_25

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Wehrheim, H.: Bounded model checking for partial Kripke structures. In: Fitzgerald, J.S., Haxthausen, A.E., Yenigun, H. (eds.) ICTAC 2008. LNCS, vol. 5160, pp. 380–394. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-85762-4_26

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nils Timm .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Timm, N., Gruner, S., Harvey, M. (2016). A Bounded Model Checker for Three-Valued Abstractions of Concurrent Software Systems. In: Ribeiro, L., Lecomte, T. (eds) Formal Methods: Foundations and Applications. SBMF 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10090. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49815-7_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49815-7_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-49814-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-49815-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics