Skip to main content

The Theory and Practice of Comparable Selection in Real Estate Valuation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advances in Automated Valuation Modeling

Part of the book series: Studies in Systems, Decision and Control ((SSDC,volume 86))

Abstract

The article is focused n the techniques to select comparables, providing evidence that it is possible to deal with this delicate phase of the automated valuation process in a scientific way.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The “grid method” or “grid estimator” is a common description given to the comparable sales analysis technique.

References

  • Ahmad, A., & Dey, L. (2007). A method to compute distance between two categorical values of same attribute in unsupervised learning for categorical data set. Pattern Recognition Letters, 28(1), 110–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borst, R. A. (2014). Improving mass appraisal valuation models using spatio-temporal methods. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: International Property Tax Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borst, R. A., & McCluskey, W. J. (2007). Comparative evaluation of the comparable sales method with geostatistical valuation models. Pacific Rim Property Research Journal, 13(1), 106–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cannaday, R.E. (1989). How should you estimate and provide market support for adjustments in single family appraisals. Real Estate Appraiser and Analyst, 55(4), 43–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Colwell, P., Cannaday, R., & Wu, C. (1983). The analytical foundations of adjustment grid methods. Journal of the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, 11(1), 11–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Detweiler, J., & Radigan, R. (1996). Computer-assisted real estate appraisal. Appraisal Journal January 91–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaz, J. (1990, October). The process of selecting comparable sales. The Appraisal Journal, 533–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epley, D. R. (1996). Note on the optimal selection and weighting of comparable properties. Journal of Real Estate Research, 14(1/2), 175–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gau, G. W., Lai, T.-Y., & Wang, K. (1992). Optimal comparable selection and weighting in real property valuation: An extension. AREUEA Journal, 20(1), 107–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, D., Kleinberg, J., & Raghavan, P. (2000). Clustering categorical data: An approach based on dynamical systems. The VLDB Journal, 8(3), 222–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gipe, G. W. (1974). Analysis of residuals to improve multiple regression equations. Assessors Journal, 9(1), 9–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guha, S., Rastogi, R., & Shim, K. (2000). ROCK: A robust clustering algorithm for categorical attributes. Information Systems, 25(5), 345–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Z. (1998). Extensions to the k-means algorithm for clustering large data sets with categorical values. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 2(3), 283–304.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Isakson, H. (1986). The nearest neighbors appraisal technique: An alternative to the adjustment grid methods. Journal of the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, 14, 274–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, H.-B., & Reichert, A. K. (1991). An empirical analysis of hedonic regression and grid-adjustment techniques in real estate appraisal. AREUEA Journal, 19(1), 70–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krause, A., & Kummerow, M. (2009). An iterative approach to minimizing valuation Errors using an automated comparables sales model. Journal of Property Tax Assessment & Administration, 8(2), 39–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai, T.-Y., & Wang, K. (1996). Comparing the accuracy of the minimum-variance grid method to multiple regression in appraised value estimates. Real Estate Economics, 24(4), 531–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCluskey, W.J., & Borst, R.A. (1998). Application of hybrid intelligent appraisal techniques within the field of comparable sales analysis. Paper presented at IAAO Annual Conference: Today’s Vision Tomorrow’s Reality, Orlando, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J. (2009). A history of appraisal theory and practice: Looking back from IAAO’s 75th year. Journal of Property Tax Assessment and Administration, 6(3), 23–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pace, R., & Gilley, O. (1998). Generalizing the OLS and grid estimators. Real Estate Economics, 1, 331–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shenkel, W.M., & Eidson, A.S. (1971, October). Comparable sales retrieval systems. Appraisal Journal, 540–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skaff, M.S. (1975, April). The search for comparable sales: A new approach. Assessors Journal, 7–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneath, P.H.A., & Sokal, R.R. (1973). Numerical taxonomy: The principles and practice of numerical classification. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tchira, A. (1979, January). Comparable sales selection—A computer approach. The Appraisal Journal, 86 – 98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J.F. (1997). Comparable sales as a computer assisted valuation (Mass Appraisal) Technique—Designing efficient programs for comparable sales selection and valuation. Paper presented at IAAO Annual Conference (pp 476—485).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J.F., & Gordon J.F. (1987). Constrained regression modeling and the multiple regression analysis - comparable sales approach. Property Tax Journal, 6(4), 251–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Todora, J., & Whiterell, D. (2002, January, February). Automating the sales comparison approach. Assessment Journal, 25–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood, W. E., & Moesch, J.R. (1982). The second generation of CAMA in New York State. Paper presented at the 1st World Congress on Computer Assisted Valuation Cambridge MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandell, K. D. (1991). Optimal comparables selection and weighting in real property valuation. Real Estate Economics, 19(2), 213–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X., De Baets, B., & Kerre, E. (1995). A comparative study of similarity measures. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 73(2), 259–268.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William J. McCluskey .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McCluskey, W.J., Borst, R.A. (2017). The Theory and Practice of Comparable Selection in Real Estate Valuation. In: d'Amato, M., Kauko, T. (eds) Advances in Automated Valuation Modeling. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, vol 86. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49746-4_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49746-4_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-49744-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-49746-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics