Skip to main content

International Donors and Local CSOs in Gaza: 2007–2013

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Delivering Aid Without Government

Part of the book series: The Anthropocene: Politik—Economics—Society—Science ((APESS,volume 7))

  • 446 Accesses

Abstract

This research aims to examine the dynamics and the impact of international donors’ financing on local CSOs in the Gaza Strip over the course of the six years that followed the takeover by Hamas. It is not clear whether donor funding strengthened CSOs’ role at the expense of the state, leading to an undermining of the state, or if it instead alleviated pressure on the state through the provision of social services normally associated as being state responsibility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Keywords: civil society organization (CSO), Gaza, Hamas, donors, fragile states, translational actors, neoliberalism, Transnational Actor Influence Model (TAI), proposal actors, veto players, People-Centered Liberationist Development” (PCLD), New Public Management.

References

  • Béland, Daniel and Mitchell Orenstein. 2009. “How Do Transnational Policy Actors Matter?” Paper presented on August 20 at the Annual Meeting of the Research Committee 19 of the International Sociological Association (Montreal).

    Google Scholar 

  • Börzel, Tanja A. 2010. “Governance with/out Government. False Promises or Flawed Premises?” SFB-Governance Working Paper Series, No. 23, Research Center (SFB) 700, Berlin, March 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Héritier, Adrienne. 2003. “New Modes of Governance in Europe: Increasing Political Capacity and Policy Effectiveness?” In The State of the European Union, 6: Law, Politics, and Society, edited by Tanja A. Börzel and Rachel A. Cichowski, 105–126. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Héritier, Adrienne, and Dirk Lehmkuhl. 2011. “New modes of governance and democratic accountability.” Government and Opposition 46(1): 126–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellman, Joel S., Geraint Jones, and Daniel Kaufmann. 2000. “Seize the state, seize the day: State capture, corruption and influence in transition.” Policy Research Working Paper. 2444 Synthesis. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby Wade. 2008. “Minority traditions and post-Communist politics: How do IGOs matter?” In Transnational Actors in Central and East European Transitions, edited by Mitchell Alexander Orenstein and Stephen Bloom, 56–76. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalidi Raja, and Sobhi Samour. 2011. “Neoliberalism as liberation: The statehood program and the remaking of the Palestinian national movement.” Journal of Palestine Studies XL (2) (Winter): 6–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon John W. 1997. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Choices. London, UK: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, David L. 1996. “Focus Groups.” Annual Review of Sociology 22: 129–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakhleh, Khalil. 2012. Globalized Palestine: The national sell-out of a homeland. Trenton, NJ: The Red Sea Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orenstein, Mitchell A. 2008. Privatizing Pensions: The transnational campaign for social security reform. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palestine Investment Conference. (2008). Accessed November 15, 2015. http://www.pic-palestine.ps/.

  • Peters, Guy B. and John Pierre. 1998. “Governance without government? Rethinking public administration.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 8(2): 223–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weale, Albert. 2011. “New modes of governance, political accountability and public reason.” Government and Opposition 46(1): 58–80.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tamer Qarmout .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Qarmout, T. (2017). International Donors and Local CSOs in Gaza: 2007–2013. In: Delivering Aid Without Government. The Anthropocene: Politik—Economics—Society—Science, vol 7. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49661-0_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics