Skip to main content

The Service Configurator—How to Optimally Split Project Scopes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Practices for Network Management

Abstract

Companies producing large capital goods often extend their goods offerings with various project-related services. However, they often struggle with properly productizing these services due to a limited understanding of which customer needs the services fulfill. To solve this problem, a service configurator was developed to identify challenges in the context of a delivery project and to match them with appropriate services. The configurator enables value-driven selling and ultimately establishes a tighter relationship between a salesman and a customer by guiding negotiations and real-time reflection on the optimal scope split between the parties. This elevates the role of the customer from a passive receiver to an active co-creator of the solution. An online version of the tool was also developed and tested with a case company.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aharoni, Y., Tihanyi, L., & Connelly, B. L. (2011). Managerial decision-making in international business: A forty-five-year retrospective. Journal of World Business, 46(2), 135–142. doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2010.05.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bask, A. H., Lipponen, M., Rajahonka, M., & Tinnilä, M. (2011). Modularity in logistics services: A business model and process view. International Journal of Services and Operations Management, 10(4), 379–399. doi:10.1504/IJSOM.2011.043463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brady, T., Davies, A., & Gann, D. M. (2005). Creating value by delivering integrated solutions. International Journal of Project Management, 23(5), 360–365. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.01.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, M. J., & Budd, C. S. (2007). Tying the pieces together: A normative framework for integrating sales and project operations. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(2), 173–182. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2006.03.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edkins, A., Geraldi, J., Morris, P., & Smith, A. (2013). Exploring the front-end of project management. Engineering Project Organization Journal, 3(2), 71–85. doi:10.1080/21573727.2013.775942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forza, C., & Salvador, F. (2002). Managing for variety in the order acquisition and fulfilment process: The contribution of product configuration systems. International Journal of Production Economics, 76(1), 87–98. doi:10.1016/S0925-5273(01)00157-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J. R. (1973). Designing complex organization. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J. R. (1999). A bias toward short-term thinking in threat-related negative emotional states. PSPB, 25(1), 65–75. doi:10.1007/BF02985213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. (2013). Moral tribes: Emotion, reason, and the gap between us and them. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellström, M. (2014). Solution business models based on functional modularity—The case of complex capital goods. Journal of Service Management, 25(5), 654–676. doi:10.1108/JOSM-07-2013-0198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hellström, M., Wikström, R., Gustafsson, M., & Luotola, H. (2016). The value of project execution services: A problem and uncertainty perspective. Construction Management and Economics. Retrieved April 28, 2016, from http://www.tandfonline.com/eprint/GWdGQnfAXCmhGMsHruB2/full#.VyJ3KsA3Ju4.mendeley

  • Jarzabkowski, P., & Kaplan, S. (2015). Strategy tools-in-use: A framework for understanding “technologies of rationality” in practice. Strategic Management Journal, 36(4), 537–558. doi:10.1002/smj.2270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kowalkowski, C., Windahl, C., Kindström, D., & Gebauer, H. (2015). What service transition? Rethinking established assumptions about manufacturers’ service-led growth strategies. Industrial Marketing Management, 45, 59–69. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.02.016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liinamaa, J., Viljanen, M., Hurmerinta, A., Ivanova-Gongne, M., Luotola, H., & Gustafsson, M. (2016). Performance-based and functional contracting in value-based solution selling. Industrial Marketing Management, 59, 37–49. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.05.032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, R., & Turner, J. R. (2007). Matching the project manager’s leadership style to project type. International Journal of Project Management, 25(1), 21–32. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.04.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahikka, E., Ulkuniemi, P., & Pekkarinen, S. (2011). Developing the value perception of the business customer through service modularity. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 26(5), 357–367. doi:10.1108/08858621111144415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez, R. (1999). Value co-production: Intellectual origins and implications for practice and research. Strategic Management Journal, 20(1), 49–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riitahuhta, A., & Pulkkinen, A. (2001). Design for configuration a debate based on the 5th workshop on product structuring. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoll, T., & Piller, F. (2003). Konfigurationssysteme für Mass Customization und Variantenproduktion: Strategie, Erfolgsfaktoren und Technologie von Systemen zur Kundenintegration. Munich, Germany: Think Consult.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvador, F. (2007). Toward a product system modularity construct: Literature review and reconceptualization. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 54(2), 219–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savolainen, P., & Ahonen, J. J. (2014). Knowledge lost: Challenges in changing project manager between sales and implementation in software projects. International Journal of Project Management, 33(1), 92–102. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.04.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turkulainen, V., Kujala, J., Artto, K., & Levitt, R. E. (2013). Organizing in the context of global project-based firm: The case of sales-operations interface. Industrial Marketing Management, 42(2), 223–233. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2012.08.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winch, G. M. (2015). Project organizing as a problem in information. Construction Management and Economics, 33(2), 106–116. doi:10.1080/01446193.2015.1021703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are very grateful for the collaborative disposition of our case company and for the cooperation with members of their staff: this constituted the core of our research. Furthermore, we would like to acknowledge Dr. Magnus Gustafsson for providing relevant and important insights. Finally, the collaboration of our programmers, Mr. Mikael Sand and Mr. Robert Syring, is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hellström, M., Sifontes Herrera, V.A., Wikström, R., Långstedt, J. (2017). The Service Configurator—How to Optimally Split Project Scopes. In: Vesalainen, J., Valkokari, K., Hellström, M. (eds) Practices for Network Management . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49649-8_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics