Skip to main content

A Tool for Increased Cognitive Ergonomics in Operative Supplier Selection in a Global Context

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Practices for Network Management

Abstract

In this chapter, we put forth a decision support system that aims to increase cognitive ergonomics of actual, routine sourcing praxis in operative procurement work. The tool is motivated by a lack of academic methods as well as practical tools for evaluating suppliers’ actual, tangible appropriateness for specific supply tasks, as opposed to the fit of a supplier in general, or on average. Furthermore, and importantly, this company-internal tool is intended to serve as a platform for a more extensive tool to organize inter-organizational buyer-supplier interaction practices. The tool is developed at a case company, a large marine product manufacturer with globally dispersed supplier and customer bases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alavi, M., & Leinder, D. E. (2001). Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, G. G., Oppenheimer, R. J., & Bastien, A. (2002). Trust deterioration in an international buyer-supplier relationship. Journal of Business Ethics, 36(1), 65–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. D., Gerstenfeld, A., & Zengh, A. Z. (2004). How many suppliers are best? A decision-analysis approach. Omega, 32(1), 9–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brinkman, W. P., & Neerincx, M. (2011). Cognitive ergonomics for situated human-automation collaboration. Interacting with Computers, 23(4), iii–iiv.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2011). Race against the machine: How the digital revolution is accelerating innovation, driving productivity, and irreversibly transforming employment and the economy. Lexington, MA: Digital Frontier Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler Jr., J. K. (1999). Trust expectations, information sharing, climate of trust, and negotiation effectiveness and efficiency. Group & Organization Management, 24(2), 217–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demirkan, H., & Delen, D. (2013). Leveraging the capabilities of service-oriented decision support systems: Putting analytics and big data in cloud. Decision Support Systems, 55(1), 412–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Boer, L., Labro, E., & Morlacchi, P. (2001). A review of methods supporting supplier selection. European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 7(2), 75–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Boer, L., & van der Wegen, L. (2003). Practice and promise of formal supplier selection: A study of four empirical cases. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 9(3), 109–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Degani, A., & Wiener, E. L. (1993). Cockpit checklists: Concepts, design, and use. Human Factors, 35(2), 345–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Droege, S. B., & Hoobler, J. M. (2003). Employee turnover and tacit knowledge diffusion: A network perspective. Journal of Managerial Issues, 15(1), 50–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dui, J., Bruder, R., Buckle, P., Carayon, P., Faizon, P., Marras, W. S., et al. (2012). A strategy for human factors/ergonomics: Developing the discipline and profession. Ergonomics, 55(4), 377–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ely, J. W., Graber, M. L., & Croskerry, P. (2011). Checklists to reduce diagnostic errors. Academic Medicine, 86(3), 307–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engelbrecht, A. P. (2007). Computational intelligence: An introduction. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez, M., & Bouty, I. (2011). The emergence of an influential practice: Food for thought. Organization Studies, 32(7), 921–940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haldin-Herrgard, T. (2000). Difficulties in diffusion of tacit knowledge in organizations. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 1(4), 357–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassal, M., Xiao, T., Sanderson, P., & Neal, A. (2015). Human factors and ergonomics. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (pp. 297–305). Oxford: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, W., Xu, X., & Dey, P. (2010). Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 202(1), 16–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobday, M. (1998). Product complexity, innovation and industrial organization. Research Policy, 26(6), 689–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, S. H., & Kerskar, H. (2007). Comprehensive and configurable metrics for supplier selection. International Journal of Production Economics, 105(2), 510–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarzabkowski, P., & Seidl, D. (2008). The role of meetings in the social practice of strategy. Organization Studies, 29(11), 1391–1426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarzabkowski, P., Spee, A. P., & Smets, M. (2013). Material artifacts: Practices for doing strategy with ‘stuff’. European Management Journal, 31(1), 41–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarzabkowski, P., & Wilson, D. C. (2002). Top teams and strategy in a UK university. Journal of Management Studies, 39(3), 355–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, S. (2011). Strategy and PowerPoint: An inquiry into the epistemic culture and machinery of strategy making. Organization Science, 22(2), 320–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, R. G., & Leszczyc, P. T. L. P. (2005). An optimization approach to business buyer choice sets: How many suppliers should be included? Industrial Marketing Management, 34(1), 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinoshita, S., & Yamada, M. (1989). The impacts of robotization on macro and sectoral economies with a world econometric model. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 35(2–3), 211–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ko, M., Tiwari, A., & Mehnen, J. (2010). A review of soft computing applications in supply chain management. Applied Soft Computing, 10(3), 661–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003). Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 40(3), 191–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lounsbury, M., & Crumley, E. T. (2007). New practice creation: An institutional perspective on innovation. Organization Studies, 28(7), 993–1012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundgren, E. L., & Kock, S. (2016). A sensemaking perspective on coopetition. Industrial Marketing Management, 57, 97–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mantere, S. (2013). What is organizational strategy? A language-based view. Journal of Management Studies, 50(8), 1408–1426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marra, M., Ho, W., & Edwards, J. S. (2012). Supply chain knowledge management: A literature review. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(5), 6103–6110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moisander, J., & Stenfors, S. (2009). Exploring the edges of theory-practice gap: Epistemic cultures in strategy-tool development and use. Organization, 16(2), 227–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nah, F. F. H., Lau, J. L. S., & Kuang, J. (2001). Critical factors for successful implementation of enterprise systems. Business Management Journal, 7(3), 285–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panteli, N., & Sockalingam, S. (2005). Trust and conflict within virtual inter-organizational alliances: A framework for facilitating knowledge sharing. Decision Support Systems, 39(4), 599–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, E. M. (1997). Analysis of decision making in nuclear power plant emergencies: An investigation of aided decision making. In C. E. Zsambok & G. Klein (Eds.), Naturalistic decision making (pp. 175–182). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouleau, L. (2005). Micro-practices of strategic sensemaking and sensegiving: How middle managers interpret and sell change every day. Journal of Management Studies, 42(7), 1413–1441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozemeijr, F. (2000). How to manage corporate purchasing synergy in a decentralized company? Towards design rules for managing and organising purchasing synergy in decentralised companies. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 6(1), 5–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shim, J. P., Warkentin, M., Courtney, J. F., Power, D. J., Shadra, R., & Carlsson, C. (2002). Past, present, and future of decision support technology. Decision Support Systems, 33(2), 111–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1991). Bounded rationality and organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 125–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, B. (2009). Pragmatism, Mead and the practice turn. Organization Studies, 30(12), 1329–1347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sitkin, S. B. (1992). Learning through failure: The strategy of small losses. Research in Organizational Behavior, 14, 231–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stinchcombe, A., & Heimer, C. (1985). Organization theory and project management: Administering uncertainty in Norwegian offshore oil. Oslo: Norwegian University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trent, R. J., & Monzcka, R. M. (2003a). International purchasing and global sourcing—What are the differences? Journal of Supply Chain Management, 39(3), 26–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trent, R. J., & Monzcka, R. M. (2003b). Understanding integrated global sourcing. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 33(7), 607–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuomikangas, N., & Kaipia, R. (2014). A coordination framework for sales and operations planning (S&OP): Synthesis from the literature. International Journal of Production Economics, 154(4), 243–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urbach, D. R., Govindarajan, A., Saskin, R., Wilton, A. S., & Baxter, N. N. (2014). Introducing surgical safety checklists in Ontario, Canada. New England Journal of Medicine, 370, 1029–1038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, W. P., Otto, J., & Chung, Q. B. (2002). Knowledge acquisition for expert systems in accounting and financial problem domains. Knowledge-Based Systems, 15(8), 439–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nokelainen, T., Hellström, M., Wikström, R. (2017). A Tool for Increased Cognitive Ergonomics in Operative Supplier Selection in a Global Context. In: Vesalainen, J., Valkokari, K., Hellström, M. (eds) Practices for Network Management . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49649-8_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics