Skip to main content

Third-Party-Supported Benchmarking for Reciprocal Learning

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 883 Accesses

Abstract

The tool has been developed for situations when a focal company encounters a practical problem in network management but does not have resources to match the problem into the right theoretical context and divide the problem into manageable entities. Here, benchmarking is viewed through a practice lens. Practice lens leads to focusing on the use of tool for creating common language and offering space for interaction. The tool has been developed and tested in a case where the focal company wanted to improve its R&D processes and better manage its innovation network. The purpose is to show how third-party-supported benchmarking is mobilized, that is, to provide the guidelines for successful benchmarking facilitating discussions and reciprocal learning in a network as well as to present the outcomes the process generated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • American Productivity and Quality Center. (1993). The benchmarking management guide. Portland, OR: Productivity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, B., Fagerhaug, T., Randmæl, S., Schuldmaier, J., & Prenninger, J. (1999). Benchmarking supply chain management: Finding best practices. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 14(5/6), 378–389. doi:10.1108/08858629910290139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bendell, T., Boulter, L., & Kelly, J. (1993). Benchmarking for competitive advantage. London: Financial Times/Pitman Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhutta, K. S., & Huq, F. (1999). Benchmarking-best practices: An integrated approach. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 6(3), 254–268. doi:10.1108/14635779910289261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boxwell, R. J., & Boxwell, R. J. (1994). Benchmarking for competitive advantage (p. 30). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camp, R. C. (1989). Benchmarking: The search for industry best practices that lead to superior performance. White Plains, NY: Quality Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlile, P. R. (2004). Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organization Science, 15(5), 555–568. doi:10.1287/orsc.1040.0094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elmuti, D., & Kathawala, Y. (1997). An overview of benchmarking process: A tool for continuous improvement and competitive advantage. Benchmarking for Quality Management & Technology, 4(4), 229–243. doi:10.1108/14635779710195087.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R. M. (1986). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal Winter, 17(109), 109–122. doi:10.1002/smj.4250171110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong, P., Hong, S. W., Jungbae Roh, J., & Park, K. (2012). Evolving benchmarking practices: A review for research perspectives. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 19(4/5), 444–462. doi:10.1108/14635771211257945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarzabkowski, P., & Kaplan, S. (2015). Strategy tools-in-use: A framework for understanding “technologies of rationality” in practice. Strategic Management Journal, 36, 537–558. doi:10.1002/smj.2270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleemola, A. (2005). Group benchmarking as a model for knowledge creation in supply management context. Doctoral thesis. Tampere University of Technology. Publication 555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matters, M., & Evans, A. (1996). The nuts and bolts of benchmarking. Benchmarking Link-Up Australia. available at: http://www.ozemail.com.au/~benchmark/nuts.bolts.html

  • Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reider, R. (2000). Benchmarking strategies: A tool for profit improvement. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simatupang, T. M., Sridharan, R. (2005). Supply chain discontent: Business Process Management Journal, 11(4), 349–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, S. L. (2010). This is not a boundary object: Reflections on the origin of a concept. Science, Technology & Human Values, 35(5), 601–617. doi:10.1177/0162243910377624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420. doi:10.1177/030631289019003001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mäenpää, S., Suominen, A., Breite, R. (2017). Third-Party-Supported Benchmarking for Reciprocal Learning. In: Vesalainen, J., Valkokari, K., Hellström, M. (eds) Practices for Network Management . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49649-8_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics