Skip to main content

The Sustainable Portion of Gross Domestic Product: A Proposed Social Ecological Economic Indicator for Sustainable Economic Development

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainable Building and Built Environments to Mitigate Climate Change in the Tropics

Abstract

This article discusses a way of measuring the sustainable portion of Gross Domestic Product (GDPs) and argues for its use as an ecological-social economic indicator to evaluate the economic footprint of human activities and products as being environmentally and culturally sustainable. It proposes a method for calculating GDPs based on four quantitative factors: the domestic product or economic activity, its ecological footprint, its overshoot portion of energy use, and the cost of generating the overshoot portion of energy use using renewable resources (in this study wind and solar electric systems). As a case study of using GDPs as an indicator, this article investigates the economic footprint of the Otago Central Rail Trail (OCRT) which has been cited by the New Zealand Tourism Strategy 2015 as a successful tourism project. Using GDPs the finding for the OCRT is that 43.6 % of total OCRT GDP must be spent to restore the environment damaged through its development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agenda21 (1992) United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED), Rio de Janeiro

    Google Scholar 

  • Appleby P (2011) Integrated sustainable design of buildings. Lodon: Earthscan

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagstad KJ, Shammin MR (2012) Can the genuine progress indicator better inform sustainable regional progress? – a case study for Northeast Ohio. J Ecol Econ 18:330–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrass R, Sprenger RU, Triebswetter U (1997) Cohesion and the environment: policy integration at European level. J Eur Env 7:101–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns G, Corbet R (2007) New Zealand Tourism strategy 2015. New Zealand Ministry of Tourism. Available at http://www.nztourismstrategy.com. Accessed on 13 Nov 2010

  • Central Otago District Council (CODC) (2011) OCRT user survey gross results. CODC, Otago

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly HE, Cobb JB (1989) For the common good. Beacon Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • de Graaf HJ, Musters CJM, Keurs WJT (1996) Sustainable development: looking for new strategies. J Ecol Econ 16:205–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Energy Efficiency and Conservation Authority (EECA) (2012) Available at. http://www.energywise.govt.nz, Accessed on 18 May 2012

  • Golusin M, Ivanovic OM (2009) Definition, characteristics and state of the indicators of sustainable development in countries of South-eastern Europe. J Agric Ecosyst Environ 130:67–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham OJ (2009) The Otago Central Rail Trail: Preservation of heritage sites through development for visitor use, 3rd Australasian engineering heritage conference. Available at. http://www.ipenz.org.nz. Accessed on 12 Dec 2010

  • Jellum C, Reis A (2008) Otago Central Rail Trail economic impact survey, Otago Central Rail Trail Trust. Available at http://www.otagocentralrailtrail.co.nz. Accessed on 17 Dec 2010

  • Lawn PA (2003) A theoretical foundation to support the Index of sustainable economic welfare (ISEW), genuine progress indicator (GPI), and other related indexes. J Ecol Econ 44:105–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahravan A (2012) Eco-tourism and its architecture: a methodological framework for assessing progress towards sustainable development. Published PhD thesis, Victoria University of Wellington

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahravan A, Vale B (2011) Cultural framework and related indicators for evaluation of sustainability through development of tourism. Presented and published in Shanghai International Conference on Social Science (SICSS 2011), Shanghai

    Google Scholar 

  • Mog JM (2004) Struggling with sustainability – a comparative framework for evaluating sustainable development programs. J World Dev 12:2139–2160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nader MR, AbiSalloum B, Karam N (2008) Environment and sustainable development indicators in Lebanon: a practical municipal level approach. J Ecol Indicators 8:771–777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • New Zealand Council of Trade Unions (NZCTU) (2010) Available at http://union.org.nz. Accessed on 17 May 2011

  • Nourry M (2008) Measuring sustainable development: some empirical evidence for France from eight alternative indicators. J Ecol Econ 67:441–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Omer AM (2008) Energy, environment and sustainable development. J Renew Sust Energy Rev 12:2265–2300

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Otago Central Rail Trial official web site, available at http://www.otagocentralrailtrail.co.nz/. Accessed on 21 May 2012

  • Pulselli FM, Ciampalini F, Tiezzi E, Zappia C (2006) The index of sustainable economic welfare (ISEW) for a local authority: a case study in Italy. J Ecol Econ 60:271–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rennings K, Wiggering H (1997) Steps towards indicators of sustainable development: Linking economic and ecological concepts. Ecol Econ 20:25–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robin CPY, Poon CS (2009) Cultural shift towards sustainability in the construction industry of Hong Kong. J Environ Manag 90:3616–3628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spangenberg JH, Pfahi S, Deller K (2002) Towards indicators for institutional sustainability: Lessons from an analysis of Agenda 21. J Ecol Indicators 2:61–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (2011) Towards a green economy, 100 Watt, France. Available at http://www.unep.org. Accessed on 28 Dec 2011

  • US Department of Energy (2011) (2010), Solar Technologies Market report D DOE/GO-102011-3318 NREL November, 60

    Google Scholar 

  • Vale B, Vale R (2009) Time to eat the dog? Thames & Hudson Ltd., London

    Google Scholar 

  • Vera I, Langlois L (2007) Energy indicators for sustainable development. Energy 32:875–882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel M, Rees W (1996) Our ecological footprint: reducing human impact on the Earth. New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2012) Poverty and equity data. Available at http://povertydata.worldbank.org/poverty/home. Accessed on 27 May 2012

  • World Bank Development Indicators (2008) Available at http://www.globalissues.org/issue/235/consumption-and-consumerism . Accessed on 16 Jan 2012

  • World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED) (1987) Brundtland report. Brundtland Commission

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abbas Mahravan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mahravan, A., Vale, B. (2017). The Sustainable Portion of Gross Domestic Product: A Proposed Social Ecological Economic Indicator for Sustainable Economic Development. In: Karyono, T., Vale, R., Vale, B. (eds) Sustainable Building and Built Environments to Mitigate Climate Change in the Tropics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49601-6_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics