Skip to main content

Accountability and Performance of Italian Local Government Authorities: How Does e-Disclosure Affect Performance?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation ((LNISO,volume 20))

Abstract

The Internet has become the most important channel to disclose information and to reduce the distance between local government authorities and its stakeholders, in order to maintain politicians, managers and public administrations accountable. The study examines the relationship between accountability and performance of Italian Local Government Authorities that are obliged to disclose performance data on their website, in order to enhance transparency and participation for improving public performance. Findings show no significant relationship between e-disclosure and performance, underlining that the greater transparency is only symbolic, and a positive and significant relationship between media interest and performance, highlighting the relevant role that media could have in stimulating citizens to control ways through which politicians and public managers spent money and create public value.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1993). Reinventing Governament: How the enterpreneurial spiritis transforming the public sector. New York: Penguin Book.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Royle, M. T., Hall, A. T., Hochwarter, W. A., Perrewé, P. L., & Ferris, G. R. (2005). The interactive effects of accountability and job self-efficacy on organizational citizenship behavior and political behavior. Organizational Analysis, 13(1), 53–71.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fountain, J. (1991). Service efforts and accomplishment reporting. Public Productivity and Management Review, 15(2), 191–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lepore, L., & Pisano, S. (2013). Determinants of Internet-based performance reporting released by Italian local government authorities. In D. Mancini, E. Vaassen, & R. P. Dameri (Eds), Accounting information systems for decision making. Vol. 3 of Springer series: Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation. Berlin: Springer Physica-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Farneti, G. (2011). Ragioneria pubblica. Il “nuovo” sistema informativo delle aziende pubbliche. Milano: FrancoAngeli.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Schaltegger, C. A., & Torgler, B. (2007). Government accountability and fiscal discipline: A panel analysis using Swiss data. Journal of Public Economics, 91(1), 117–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cavalluzzo, K. S., & Ittner, C. D. (2004). Implementing performance measurement innovations: Evidence from government. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29, 243–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kluvers, R. (2003). Accountability for performance in local government. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 62(1), 57–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dunleavy, P., & Hood, C. (1994). From old public-administration to new public management. Public Money & Management, 14(3), 9–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2000). Public management reform: A comparative analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cyberspace Public Research Group. (2001). Web attribute evaluation system (WAES). http://www.cyprg.arizona.edu

  12. Demchak, C. C., Friis, C., & La Porte, T. M. (2000). Webbing governance: National differences in constructing the public face. In G. D. Garson (Ed.), Handbook of public information systems (pp. 179–196). New York: Marcel Dekker.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Drüke, H. (2007). Can e-government make public governance more accountable? In A. Shah (Ed.), Performance accountability and combating corruption (pp. 59–87). Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  14. La Porte, T. M., Demchak, C. C., & De Jong, M. (2002). Democracy and bureaucracy in the age of the web. Empirical findings and theoretical speculations. Administration & Society, 34(4), 411–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim, P. S., Halligan, J., Cho, N., Oh, C. H., & Eikenberry, A. M. (2005). Toward participatory and transparent governance: Report on the sixth global forum on reinventing government. Public Administration Review, 65(6), 646–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Serrano-Cinca, C., Rueda-Tomas, M., & Portillo-Tarragona, P. (2008). Factors influencing e-disclosure in local public administrations. In Documento de Trabajo 2008-03, Facultad de Ciencias Economicas y Empresariales, Universidad de Zaragoza.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Garcìa, A. C., & García-García, J. (2010). Determinants of online reporting of accounting information by Spanish LGAs. Local Government Studies, 36(5), 679–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Laswad, F., Fisher, R., & Oyelere, P. (2005). Determinants of voluntary Internet financial reporting by LGA. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24, 101–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yu, H. (2010). On the determinants of Internet-based Disclosure of Government Financial Information. In Conference Proceeding of Management and Service Science (MASS).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ansari, S., & Euske, K. J. (1987). Rational, rationalizing, and reifying uses of accounting data in organizations. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12(6), 549–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Brignall, S., & Modell, S. (2000). An institutional perspective on performance measurement and management in the ‘new public sector’. Management Accounting Research, 11(3), 281–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Geiger, D. R., & Ittner, C. D. (1996). The influence of funding source and legislative requirements on government cost accounting practices. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 21(6), 549–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Dirsmith, M. W., Jablonsky, S. F., & Luzi, A. D. (1980). Planning and control in the U.S. government: A critical analysis of PPB, MBO and ZBB. Strategic Management Journal, 1(4), 303–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research has been published thanks to the financial support received by the Parthenope University, Naples, entitled “Bando di sostegno alla ricerca individuale per il triennio 2015–2017. Annualità 2015”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luigi Lepore .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lepore, L., Pisano, S. (2017). Accountability and Performance of Italian Local Government Authorities: How Does e-Disclosure Affect Performance?. In: Corsi, K., Castellano, N., Lamboglia, R., Mancini, D. (eds) Reshaping Accounting and Management Control Systems. Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, vol 20. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49538-5_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics