Abstract
The aim of this chapter is to analyze the role of Accounting Information Systems (AIS) in the information management when in the relationships system, characterizing the port communities (PCs), an information technology platform has been adopted, such as the Port Community System (PCS). More specifically, drawing upon the existing literature on the architecture of PCS for the information flows management among the port users, this chapter aims to investigate the nature and role of reporting to support the decision-making of Port Authorities (PAs) in the landlord port model.
In order to achieve our goal, we have conducted a literature review on the Port Community Systems (PCSs) and AIS in PCSs. Using the case study methodology, we have also conducted some semi-structured interviews with port users and Port Authority (PA) in an Italian seaport. The analysis conducted outlines a strong need to get more detailed reporting on goods. In this way, the PCSs, which include the functions of AIS, can help to improve the information basis for PAs in the future developmental decisions of seaports.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Goss, R. (1990). Economic policies and seaports: The diversity of port policies. Maritime Policy and Management, 17(3), 221–234.
Baird, A. (1995). Privatisation of trust ports in the United Kingdom: Review and analysis of the first sales. Transport Policy, 2(2), 35–143.
Liu, Z. (1995). Owner and productive efficiency: The experience of British ports. In J. McConville & J. Sheldrake (Eds.), Transport in transition: Aspects of British and European experience (pp. 163–182). Aldershot: Avebury.
De Monie, G. (1996). Privatisation of port structures, in ports for Europe: Europe’s maritime future. In L. Bekemans & S. Beckwith (Eds.), In a changing environment (pp. 267–298). Brussels: European Interuniversity Press.
Baudelaire, J. (1997). Some thoughts about port privatisation. In A. M. Goulielmos (Ed.), Essays in honour and in memory of late professor emeritus of maritime economics Dr Basil Metaxas (pp. 255–260).
Di Vaio, A., Medda, F. R., & Trujillo, L. (2011). An analysis of the efficiency of Italian cruise terminals. International Journal of Transport Economics, 38(1), 29–46.
Keceli, Y., Choi, H. R., Cha, Y. S., & Aydogdu, Y. V. (2008). A study on adoption of port community systems according to organization size. Third 2008 International Conference on Convergence and Hybrid Information Technology (pp. 493–501).
World Bank. (2007). Port Reform Tool Kit—Module 2—The evolution of ports in a competitive world, 2nd ed.
Long, A. (2009). Port community systems. World Customs Journal, 3(1), 63–72.
Srour, F. J., van Oosterhout, M., van Baalen, P., & Zuidwijk, R. (2008). Port community system implementation: Lessons learned from international scan. Transportation Research Board 87th Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.
Aydogdu, Y. V., & Aksoy, S. (2015). A study on quantitative benefits of port community systems. Maritime Policy and Management, 42(1), 1–10. doi:10.1080/03088839.2013.825053.
Rodon, J., & Ramis-Pujol, J. (2006). Exploring the intricacies of integrating with a port community system. 19th Bled eConference eValues, Bled, Slovenia.
EPCSA, European Port Community Systems Association. (2011). The role of Port Community Systems in the development of the Single Window. White Paper.
Keceli, Y. (2011). A proposed innovation strategy for Turkish port administration policy via information technology. Maritime Policy and Management, 38(2), 151–167. doi:10.1080/03088839.2011.556676.
Srour, F. J., & Ruoff, K. (2004). Transportation XML: Building a framework for the next paradigm of web services and federated databases. The TRB 83rd Annual Meeting Proceedings, Washington, DC.
Hoffer, A., George, J. F., & Valacich, J. S. (2005). Modern systems analysis and design. Upper saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
Carlan, V., Christa, S., & Thierry V. (2015). Port Community Systems costs and benefits: from competition to collaboration within the supply chain, 1–27. Paper presented at WCTRS-SIG2 (11–12/5/2015), Antwerp.
Tsamboulas, D., Moraiti, P., & Lekka, A. M. (2012). Port Perform Implementation Evaluation for Port Community System Implementation. Journal of Transportation Research Board, 2273, 29–37.
Iacovou, C. L., Benbasat, I., & Dexter, A. S. (1995). Electronic data interchange and small organizations: Adoption and impact of technology. MISQ Quarterly, 19(4), 465–485.
Muller, G. (1999). Intermodal freight transportation. Washington, DC: Eno Foundation.
Peterson, D. M. (2003). Power to the BPEL: A technology for web services. Business Communications Review, 33(6), 54.
van Heck, E., & Ribbers P. M. (1999). The Adoption and Impact of EDI in Dutch SME’s. Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii.
Vincent, S. (2003). Making EDI work in India, Article 4: Port Community Systems and EDI in the future, Exim India.
Jimenez-Martinez, J., & Polo-Redondo, Y. (2004). The influence of EDI adoption over its perceived benefits. Technovation, 24(1), 73–79.
Tijan, E., & Sasa, A. (2014). Seaport cluster information systems—A foundation for Port Community Systems’ architecture. Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO), 37th International Convention on. IEEE.
Donselaar, P. W.-V., & Kolkman, J. (2010). Societal costs and benefits of cooperation between port authorities. Maritime Policy and Management, 37(3), 271–284.
Duran, C., & Cordova, F. (2012). Conceptual analysis for the strategic and operational knowledge management of a port community. Informatica Economica, 16(2), 35–44.
Forward, K. (2003). Recent developments in port information technology. London: Digital ship Ltd.
Fernandèz-Alles, M. D. L. L., & Valle-Cabrera, R. (2006). Reconciling institutional theory with organizational theories; How neoinstitutionalism resolves five paradoxes. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 19(4), 503–517.
Rom, A., & Rohde, C. (2007). Management accounting and integrated information systems: A literature review. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 8(1), 40–68.
Bagchi, P. K., & Paik, S. K. (2001). The role of public-private partnership in port information systems development. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 14(6), 482–499.
Rodon, J., & Ramis-Pujol, J. (2006). Exploring the intricacies of integrating with a port community system. BLED 2006 Proceedings (Paper no. 9, 1–15). Accessed May 27, 2015, from http://aisel.aisnet.org/bled2006/9
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to the operators interviewed for their precious contribution to the case study investigated. A special thanks to Dr. Paolo Scarpellini, project manager of TPCS at Livorno PA, for his help to a better understanding of the use of the digital platform in the relationships system described in this manuscript. Besides, thanks are reserved to Dr. Serena Rocco for supporting our study through some interviews conducted during her graduation thesis. Any errors are entirely attributed to the authors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Di Vaio, A., Varriale, L. (2017). AIS and Reporting in the Port Community Systems: An Italian Case Study in the Landlord Port Model. In: Corsi, K., Castellano, N., Lamboglia, R., Mancini, D. (eds) Reshaping Accounting and Management Control Systems. Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, vol 20. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49538-5_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49538-5_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-49537-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-49538-5
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)