Skip to main content

AIS and Reporting in the Port Community Systems: An Italian Case Study in the Landlord Port Model

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Reshaping Accounting and Management Control Systems

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation ((LNISO,volume 20))

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to analyze the role of Accounting Information Systems (AIS) in the information management when in the relationships system, characterizing the port communities (PCs), an information technology platform has been adopted, such as the Port Community System (PCS). More specifically, drawing upon the existing literature on the architecture of PCS for the information flows management among the port users, this chapter aims to investigate the nature and role of reporting to support the decision-making of Port Authorities (PAs) in the landlord port model.

In order to achieve our goal, we have conducted a literature review on the Port Community Systems (PCSs) and AIS in PCSs. Using the case study methodology, we have also conducted some semi-structured interviews with port users and Port Authority (PA) in an Italian seaport. The analysis conducted outlines a strong need to get more detailed reporting on goods. In this way, the PCSs, which include the functions of AIS, can help to improve the information basis for PAs in the future developmental decisions of seaports.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Goss, R. (1990). Economic policies and seaports: The diversity of port policies. Maritime Policy and Management, 17(3), 221–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baird, A. (1995). Privatisation of trust ports in the United Kingdom: Review and analysis of the first sales. Transport Policy, 2(2), 35–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Liu, Z. (1995). Owner and productive efficiency: The experience of British ports. In J. McConville & J. Sheldrake (Eds.), Transport in transition: Aspects of British and European experience (pp. 163–182). Aldershot: Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  4. De Monie, G. (1996). Privatisation of port structures, in ports for Europe: Europe’s maritime future. In L. Bekemans & S. Beckwith (Eds.), In a changing environment (pp. 267–298). Brussels: European Interuniversity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baudelaire, J. (1997). Some thoughts about port privatisation. In A. M. Goulielmos (Ed.), Essays in honour and in memory of late professor emeritus of maritime economics Dr Basil Metaxas (pp. 255–260).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Di Vaio, A., Medda, F. R., & Trujillo, L. (2011). An analysis of the efficiency of Italian cruise terminals. International Journal of Transport Economics, 38(1), 29–46.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Keceli, Y., Choi, H. R., Cha, Y. S., & Aydogdu, Y. V. (2008). A study on adoption of port community systems according to organization size. Third 2008 International Conference on Convergence and Hybrid Information Technology (pp. 493–501).

    Google Scholar 

  8. World Bank. (2007). Port Reform Tool Kit—Module 2—The evolution of ports in a competitive world, 2nd ed.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Long, A. (2009). Port community systems. World Customs Journal, 3(1), 63–72.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Srour, F. J., van Oosterhout, M., van Baalen, P., & Zuidwijk, R. (2008). Port community system implementation: Lessons learned from international scan. Transportation Research Board 87th Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Aydogdu, Y. V., & Aksoy, S. (2015). A study on quantitative benefits of port community systems. Maritime Policy and Management, 42(1), 1–10. doi:10.1080/03088839.2013.825053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rodon, J., & Ramis-Pujol, J. (2006). Exploring the intricacies of integrating with a port community system. 19th Bled eConference eValues, Bled, Slovenia.

    Google Scholar 

  13. EPCSA, European Port Community Systems Association. (2011). The role of Port Community Systems in the development of the Single Window. White Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Keceli, Y. (2011). A proposed innovation strategy for Turkish port administration policy via information technology. Maritime Policy and Management, 38(2), 151–167. doi:10.1080/03088839.2011.556676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Srour, F. J., & Ruoff, K. (2004). Transportation XML: Building a framework for the next paradigm of web services and federated databases. The TRB 83rd Annual Meeting Proceedings, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hoffer, A., George, J. F., & Valacich, J. S. (2005). Modern systems analysis and design. Upper saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Carlan, V., Christa, S., & Thierry V. (2015). Port Community Systems costs and benefits: from competition to collaboration within the supply chain, 1–27. Paper presented at WCTRS-SIG2 (11–12/5/2015), Antwerp.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tsamboulas, D., Moraiti, P., & Lekka, A. M. (2012). Port Perform Implementation Evaluation for Port Community System Implementation. Journal of Transportation Research Board, 2273, 29–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Iacovou, C. L., Benbasat, I., & Dexter, A. S. (1995). Electronic data interchange and small organizations: Adoption and impact of technology. MISQ Quarterly, 19(4), 465–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Muller, G. (1999). Intermodal freight transportation. Washington, DC: Eno Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Peterson, D. M. (2003). Power to the BPEL: A technology for web services. Business Communications Review, 33(6), 54.

    Google Scholar 

  22. van Heck, E., & Ribbers P. M. (1999). The Adoption and Impact of EDI in Dutch SME’s. Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Vincent, S. (2003). Making EDI work in India, Article 4: Port Community Systems and EDI in the future, Exim India.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jimenez-Martinez, J., & Polo-Redondo, Y. (2004). The influence of EDI adoption over its perceived benefits. Technovation, 24(1), 73–79.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tijan, E., & Sasa, A. (2014). Seaport cluster information systems—A foundation for Port Community Systems’ architecture. Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO), 37th International Convention on. IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Donselaar, P. W.-V., & Kolkman, J. (2010). Societal costs and benefits of cooperation between port authorities. Maritime Policy and Management, 37(3), 271–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Duran, C., & Cordova, F. (2012). Conceptual analysis for the strategic and operational knowledge management of a port community. Informatica Economica, 16(2), 35–44.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Forward, K. (2003). Recent developments in port information technology. London: Digital ship Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Fernandèz-Alles, M. D. L. L., & Valle-Cabrera, R. (2006). Reconciling institutional theory with organizational theories; How neoinstitutionalism resolves five paradoxes. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 19(4), 503–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Rom, A., & Rohde, C. (2007). Management accounting and integrated information systems: A literature review. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 8(1), 40–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Bagchi, P. K., & Paik, S. K. (2001). The role of public-private partnership in port information systems development. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 14(6), 482–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Rodon, J., & Ramis-Pujol, J. (2006). Exploring the intricacies of integrating with a port community system. BLED 2006 Proceedings (Paper no. 9, 1–15). Accessed May 27, 2015, from http://aisel.aisnet.org/bled2006/9

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the operators interviewed for their precious contribution to the case study investigated. A special thanks to Dr. Paolo Scarpellini, project manager of TPCS at Livorno PA, for his help to a better understanding of the use of the digital platform in the relationships system described in this manuscript. Besides, thanks are reserved to Dr. Serena Rocco for supporting our study through some interviews conducted during her graduation thesis. Any errors are entirely attributed to the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Assunta Di Vaio .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Di Vaio, A., Varriale, L. (2017). AIS and Reporting in the Port Community Systems: An Italian Case Study in the Landlord Port Model. In: Corsi, K., Castellano, N., Lamboglia, R., Mancini, D. (eds) Reshaping Accounting and Management Control Systems. Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, vol 20. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49538-5_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics