Advertisement

Conclusion: “Uncomforable Proximity” and the Ethics of Display

  • Monika Pietrzak-Franger
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Literature, Science and Medicine book series (PLSM)

Abstract

The conclusion reconsiders the significance of syphilis in late nineteenth century culture. It also inquires to what extent contemporary creative and critical revisions can be regarded as adequate instruments in the rethinking of this issue. By contending that both critical and creative reconsiderations of syphilis’s semantics have themselves been prone to binary thinking, it calls for a more ethical engagement with Victorian culture.

Bibliography

  1. Basu, Kunal. The Yellow Emperor’s Cure. New York: Overlook Duckworth, 2011.Google Scholar
  2. Darby, Katy. The Whore Asylum or The Unpierc’d Heart. London: Fig Tree, 2012.Google Scholar
  3. ———. Uncomfortable Proximity. Intermedia Art. New Media, Sound and Performance. 2000. Web. 22 May 2011.Google Scholar
  4. Holman, Sheri. The Dress Lodger. New York: Atlantic Monthly P, 2000.Google Scholar
  5. Power, Maggie. Lily. London: Simon & Schuster, 1994.Google Scholar
  6. Wood, John. Endurance and Suffering: Narratives of Disease in the Nineteenth Century. Vevais, Germany: Edition Galerie Vevais, 2007.Google Scholar
  7. Arias, Rosario, and Patricia Pulham, eds. Haunting and Spectrality in Neo-Victorian Fiction. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.Google Scholar
  8. Chouliaraki, Lilie. The Spectatorship of Suffering. London, Thousand Oaks, Los Angeles CA: Sage, 2006.Google Scholar
  9. Critchley, Simon. The Ethics of Deconstruction: Derrida and Levinas. 1992. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 2007.Google Scholar
  10. Derrida, Jacques. Specters of Marx. The State of the Debt, the Work of Mourning and the New International. 1993. Trans. Peggy Kamuf. New York: Routledge Classics, 2006.Google Scholar
  11. ———, and Mark Llewellyn. Neo-Victorianism: The Victorians in the Twenty-First Century, 1999–2009. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Joyce, Simon. The Victorians in the Rearview Mirror. Athens: Ohio UP, 2004.Google Scholar
  13. Kaplan, Cora. Victoriana: Histories, Fictions, Criticism. New York: Columbia UP, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Krueger, Christine L. Introduction. Functions of Victorian Culture at the Present Time. By Krueger. Athens: Ohio UP, 2002. ix–xxx.Google Scholar
  15. Kucich, John, and Dianne F. Sadoff. Victorian Afterlife: Postmodern Culture Rewrites the Nineteenth Century. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 2000.Google Scholar
  16. Munford, Rebecca, and Paul Young. “Introduction: Engaging the Victorians.” Literature, Interpretation, Theory 10 (2009): 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Perpich, Diane. The Ethics of Emmanuel Levinas. Stanford: Stanford UP, 2008.Google Scholar
  18. Pietrzak-Franger, Monika. “‘Those Ill Things.’ On Hidden Spectactles and the Ethics of Display.” Neo-Victorian Studies 4.2 (2011): 24–48. Web. 14 January 2013.Google Scholar
  19. Sibbald, Barbara. “Imagined Lives.” CMAJ 180:1 (2009): 80–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. ———. Regarding the Pain of Others. New York: Picador, 2003.Google Scholar
  21. Voigts-Virchow, Eckart. “In-yer-Victorian-Face: A Subcultural Hermeneutics of Neo-Victorianism.” Literature Interpretation Theory 20.1 (2009): 108–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Monika Pietrzak-Franger
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut fùr Anglistik und AmerikanistikUniversität HamburgHamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations