Advertisement

Why not OSI?

  • Bill DaveyEmail author
  • Robert F. Houghton
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 491)

Abstract

This paper presents an argument that the OSI proposed standard is technically superior to the TCP/IP standard for network communications. An Actor-Network Theory approach is taken for analysis of the historical record surrounding the adoption of TCP/IP. The paper does not seek to create a new history of TCP/IP but to suggest this is a case where traditional explanations of adoption based on the nature of the technology do not explain the demise of the OSI model. Parallels are then drawn between this adoption and the possible problems with the implementation of IPV6. These parallels provide insight into the impediments that may arise with the adoption of the new standard.

Keywords

Internet OSI model TCP/IP IPV6 Adoption Actor-network theory 

References

  1. 1.
    Leiner, B.M., et al.: A brief history of the Internet. ACM SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev. 39(5), 22–31 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Leonard, K.: Communication Nets: Stochastic Message Flow and Delay. McGraw-Hill, New York (1964)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kleinrock, L.: Queueing Systems Vol: II: Computer Applications. Wiley, New York (1976)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kleinrock, L.: Information flow in large communication nets. RLE Quarterly Progress Report (1961). 1Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mowery, D.C., Simcoe, T.: Is the Internet a US invention?—an economic and technological history of computer networking. Res. Policy 31(8), 1369–1387 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    De Vivo, M., et al.: Internet vulnerabilities related to TCP/IP and T/TCP. ACM SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev. 29(1), 81–85 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    De Vivo, M., de Vivo, G.O., Isern, G.: Internet security attacks at the basic levels. ACM SIGOPS Oper. Syst. Rev. 32(2), 4–15 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Law, J.: Actor network theory and material semiotics. In: Turner, B.S. (ed.) The New Blackwell Companion to Social Theory, pp. 141–158. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Reid, J.: The Good Old Days: Networking in UK Academia ~ 25 Years Ago. [PDF] (2008). (cited 2008 16 April 2008)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cooper, B.: From Janet to SuperJanet: The Development of a High Performance Network to Support UK Higher Education and Research. The Computer Board for Universities and Research Councils (1990)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tanenbaum, A.S.: Computer Networks, 4th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2003)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Daly, M.: Topsy: The Startling Story of the Crooked Tailed Elephant, PT Barnum, and the American Wizard, Thomas Edison. Grove/Atlantic, Inc., New York (2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Oswald, E.: Android Market Share Growth Accelerating, Nielsen Finds. PC World 2011, February 2015. http://www.pcworld.com/article/226339/android_market_share_growth_accelerating_nielsen_finds.html
  14. 14.
    Deering, S.E.: Internet protocol, version 6 (IPv6) specification (1998)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nikkhah, M.: Maintaining the progress of IPv6 adoption. Comput. Netw. 102, 50–69 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Southworth, J.B.: An empirical analysis of the relationship between IPv6 readiness, IPv6 enablement, and IPv6 effectiveness at colleges and universities in the United States, Indiana State University (2016)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zamani, A.T., Ahmad, J.: IPv6 adoption: challenges & security. IJCER 3(1), 08–12 (2014)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nikkhah, M., Dovrolis, C., Guérin, R.: Why didn’t my (great!) protocol get adopted? In: Proceedings of the 14th ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks. ACM (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.RMIT UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.Idaho State UniversityPocatelloUSA

Personalised recommendations