Advertisement

Towards Machine Independence: From Mechanically Programmed Devices to the Internet of Things

  • Arthur TatnallEmail author
  • Bill Davey
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 491)

Abstract

This is an historical account of the development of an aspect of technology and of machines, leading to information technologies, the Internet and the Internet of Things. It points to an increasing trend towards these machines and devices becoming more and more independent of human intervention and control. We have not quite got there yet, but a clear trend can be observed nevertheless from mechanically controlled machines such as Al-Jazari’s Castle Clock which a naïve 13th century observer could have thought had a life of its own to modern smart kitchen and household appliances (from the Internet of Things) that really could be said to have a degree of independence. The paper makes use of actor-network theory as a lens for understanding the human and non-human elements of this historical trend.

Keywords

Machines Technology Information technology Independence Human operating Control Internet Internet of Things Artificial intelligence Science fiction Actor-Network Theory 

References

  1. 1.
    Asimov, I.: I, Robot. Gnome Press, New York (1950)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ambrosetti, N.: Wonder, sorcery, and technology: contribute to the history of medieval robotics. In: Tatnall, A. (ed.) HC 2010. IAICT, vol. 325, pp. 16–25. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-15199-6_3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wikipedia, Machine, July 2016. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machine
  4. 4.
    Soanes, C., Stevenson, A. (eds.): The Concise Oxford English Dictionary, 11th edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Merriam-Webster: Merriam-Webster Dictionary, 2015, January 2016. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/independent
  6. 6.
    Tatnall, A.: History of Computers: Hardware and Software Development, in Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems. UNESCO - Eolss Publishers Co., Ltd., Ramsey (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Al-Jazari, I.: The Book of Knowledge of Ingenious Mechanical Devices (Kitab fi ma ‘rifat al-hiyal al-handasiyya) (1206). Reidel, Dordrecht (1974)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Čapek, K.: R.U.R. (Rossum´s Universal Robots). Aventinum, Prague (1920)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dick, P.K.: Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?. Ballantine Books, New York (1968)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    McCarthy, J., et al.: A proposal for the dartmouth summer research project on artificial intelligence (1955). AI Mag. 27(4), 12–14 (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cellan-Jones, R.: Stephen Hawking warns artificial intelligence could end mankind, October 2015, 2 December 2014. http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-30290540
  12. 12.
    Tatnall, A., Davey, B.: The internet of things and beyond: rise of the non-human actors. Int. J. Actor Netw. Theor. Technol. Innov. 7(4), 58–69 (2015)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Adams, D.: The Hitch-Hikers Guide to the Galaxy. Pan Books, London (1979)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wikipedia: Cognitive Robotics. Web, 2015 January 2016. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_robotics
  15. 15.
    Harris, T.: How robots work, 2015 January 2016. http://science.howstuffworks.com/robot6.htm
  16. 16.
    Miele: Robot vacuum cleaner, January 2016. http://www.miele.com.au/domestic/robot-vacuum-cleaner-2750.htm
  17. 17.
    Callon, M.: Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In: Law, J. (ed.) power, action & belief. a new sociology of knowledge?, pp. 196–229. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London (1986)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Callon, M., Latour, B.: Unscrewing the Big Leviathan: how actors macro-structure reality and how sociologists help them to do so. In: Knorr-Cetina, K., Cicourel, A.V. (eds.) Advances in Social Theory and Methodology. Toward an Integration of Micro and Macro-sociologies, pp. 277–303. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London (1981)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Latour, B.: The Prince for Machines as well as for Machinations. In: Elliott, B. (ed.) Technology and Social Process, pp. 20–43. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh (1988)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Latour, B.: The powers of association, in power, action and belief. In: Law, J. (ed.) A New Sociology of Knowledge? Sociological Review Monograph 32, pp. 264–280. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London (1986)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Latour, B.: Aramis or the Love of Technology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1996)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Law, J.: On the social explanation of technical change: the case of the Portuguese maritime expansion. Technol. Cult. 28(2), 227–252 (1987)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Law, J. (ed.): A Sociology of Monsters. Essays on Power, Technology and Domination. Routledge, London (1991)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Law, J., Callon, M.: The life and death of an aircraft: a network analysis of technical change. In: Bijker, W., Law, J. (eds.) Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociological Change, pp. 21–52. MIT Press, Cambridge (1992)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Law, J.: Introduction: monsters, machines and sociotechnical relations. In: Law, J. (ed.) A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination. Routledge, London (1991)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Latour, B.: We Have Never Been Modern. Harvester University Press, Cambridge (1993)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tatnall, A.: Actor-network theory as a socio-technical approach to information systems research. In: Clarke, S., et al. (eds.) Socio-Technical and Human Cognition Elements of Information Systems, pp. 266–283. Information Science Publishing, Hershey (2003)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Latour, B.: Where are the missing masses? The Sociology of a Few Mundane Artifacts. In: Bijker, W., Law, J. (eds.) Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociological Change. MIT Press, Cambridge (1992)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tchalakov, I., Rogers, J.D.: Computer networks as the embodiment of social networks: the role of national scientific communities in the development of internet in the U.S. and Bulgaria. Int. J. Actor Netw. Theor. Technol. Innov. 6(3), 1–25 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wheen, A.: Dot-Dash to Dot. Com - How Modern Telecommunications Evolved from the Telegraph to the Internet. Springer, Chichester (2011)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Davison, A., Burgess, S., Tatnall, A.: Internet Technologies and Business, 3rd edn. Data Publishing, Melbourne (2008)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Colitti, W., Long, N.T., De Caro, N., Steenhaut, K.: Embedded web technologies for the internet of things. In: Mukhopadhyay, S.C. (ed.) Internet of Things. SSMI, vol. 9, pp. 55–73. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-04223-7_3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mukhopadhyay, S.C., Suryadevara, N.K.: Internet of Things: Challenges and Opportunities. In: Mukhopadhyay, S.C. (ed.) Internet of Things. SSMI, vol. 9, pp. 1–17. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-04223-7_1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ashton, K.: That ‘‘Internet of Things’’ thing. RFID J. (1999)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    CASAGRAS: CASAGRAS Final report: RFID and the inclusive model for the internet of things, 2014, October 2015. https://docbox.etsi.org/zArchive/TISPAN/Open/IoT/low%20resolution/www.rfidglobal.eu%20CASAGRAS%20IoT%20Final%20Report%20low%20resolution.pdf
  36. 36.
    Haller, S.: Internet of Things: An Integral Part of the Future Internet. SAP Research, Prague (2009)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Unnithan, C.: Examining innovation translation of rfid technology in Australian hospitals through a lens informed by actor-network theory. In: Proceedings of Information Systems. Victoria University, Melbourne (2014)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Foreshew, J.: Watch watches out for the aged, in the Australian. News Media, Melbourne (2015Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Unnithan, C., et al.: RFID translation into Australian hospitals: an exploration through actor-network theoretical lens. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Society (i-society 2013). University of Toronto, Toronto (2013)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Unnithan, C., Tatnall, A.: Actor-network theory (ANT) based visualisation of socio-technical facets of RFID technology translation: an Australian hospital scenario. Int. J. Actor Netw. Theor. Technol. Innov. 6(1), 31–53 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Davis, A.: Boost your home’s IQ with these seven gadgets, 2015, January 2016. http://theinstitute.ieee.org/technology-focus/technology-topic/boosting-your-homes-iq-with-these-seven-gadgets
  42. 42.
    Mitew, T.: Do objects dream of an Internet of things? Fibrecult. J. 2014(23), 1–25 (2014)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Rebaudengo, S.: Addicted toasters 2012, January 2016. http://www.haque.co.uk/addictedtoasters.php
  44. 44.
    Orwell, G.: Nineteeen Eighty-Four. Martin Secker and Warburg, Great Britain (1949)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Elder, J.: Everyone is Watching, in Sunday Age. Fairfax, Melbourne (2015). p. 16Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Yan, L., et al.: The Internet of Things: From RFID to the Next Generation Pervasive Networked Systems. Auerbach Publications, New York (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Carr, N.: How the Internet is making us stupid. In: The Telegraph (2010)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    O’Callaghan, J.: Google’s driverless cars will EXCEED legal speed limits so they can keep up with other drivers. In: DailyMail (2014)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Arthur, C.: What next in robot revolution? In: The Guardian Weekly, London (2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Victoria UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.RMIT UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations