Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Influence of Non-driving-Related Activities on the Driver’s Resources and Performance

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Automotive User Interfaces

Part of the book series: Human–Computer Interaction Series ((HCIS))

Abstract

Today, drivers perform many non-driving-related activities while maneuvering the car. To ensure driving safety, the designers of automotive UIs have to respect the driver’s available cognitive, perceptual and motor resources to prevent overload and in turn accidents. In this chapter, we look at the different types of driver resources, how they are loaded and limited by the primary driving task, and how this affects the resources available for non-driving-related activities. We discuss aspects such as attention, driver distraction, (cognitive) workload, and other factors such as the driver’s physical and mental state to understand the limitation of the driver’s resources and how non-driving-related activities affect the primary task performance. To enable the safe execution of non-driving-related activities, we need to design the cockpit and its UI in such a way that it requires a minimal amount of resources. We will provide an outlook towards selected novel technologies such as large head-up displays and also discuss expected effects of the transition to automated driving.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.cellular-news.com/car_bans/, last access 2016-07-10.

  2. 2.

    See for instance http://www.driverless-future.com/?page_id=384 for current predictions, last access: 2016-07-01.

  3. 3.

    http://web.archive.org/web/20150910142026/http://www.carinsurance.com/Articles/autonomous-cars-ready.aspx, last access: 2016-07-10.

References

  • AAM Driver Focus-Telematics Working Group. (2006). Statement of principles, criteria and verification procedures on driver interactions with advanced in- vehicle information and communication systems. Technical report alliance of automobile manufacturers. http://www.autoalliance.org/index.cfm?objectid=D6819130-B985-11E1-9E4C000C296BA163.

  • Ambinder, M. S., & Simons, D. J. (2005). Attention capture: The interplay of expectations, attention, and awareness. In Neurobiology of attention (pp. 69–75). doi:10.1016/b978-012375731-9/50016-1.

  • Bach, K. M., Jæger, M. G., Skov, M. B., & Thomassen, N. G. (2009). Interacting with in-vehicle systems: Understanding, measuring, and evaluating attention. In Proceedings of the 23rd British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: Celebrating People and Technology. BCS-HCI ’09, Cambridge, United Kingdom (pp. 453–462). Swinton, UK, UK: British Computer Society. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1671011.1671070.

  • Bayer, J. B., & Campbell, S. W. (2012). Texting while driving on automatic: Considering the frequency-independent side of habit. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(6), 2083–2090. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.06.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brookhuis, K. A., & Waard De, D. (2010). Monitoring drivers mental workload in driving simulators using physiological measures. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 42(3), 898–903. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2009.06.001.

  • Brown, I. D., Tickner, A. H., & Simmonds, D. C. (1969). Interference between concurrent tasks of driving and telephoning. Journal of Applied Psychology, 53(5), 419–424. doi:10.1037/h0028103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broy, N., Guo, M., Schneegass, S., Pfleging, B., & Alt, F. (2015). Introducing novel technologies in the car: Conducting a realworld study to test 3D dashboards’. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Nottingham, United Kingdom. Automotive UI ’15 (pp. 179–186). New York, NY, USA: ACM. ISBN: 978-1-4503-3736-6. doi:10.1145/2799250.2799280.

  • Bubb, H. (2003). Fahrerassistenz—primaer ein Beitrag zum Komfort oder fuer die Sicherheit? In Der Fahrer im 21. Jahrhundert: Anforderungen, Anwendungen, Aspekte für Mensch-Maschine-Systeme; Tagung Braunschweig, 2. und 3. Juni 2003, Braunschweig, Germany. VDI-Berichte; 1768 (pp. 25–44). Düsseldorf, Germany: VDI-Verlag. ISBN: 3-18- 091768-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnett, G. E. (2009). On-the-move and in your car: An overview of HCI issues for in-car computing. International Journal of Mobile Human Computer Interaction (IJMHCI), 1(1), 60–78. doi:10.4018/jmhci.2009010104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caird, J. K., Johnston, K. A., Willness, C. R., Asbridge, M., & Steel, P. (2014). A meta-analysis of the effects of texting on driving. In Accident Analysis and Prevention, 71, 311–318. ISSN: 0001-4575. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2014.06.005.

  • Caird, J. K., Scialfa, C. T., Ho, G., & Smiley, A. (2005). A meta-analysis of driving performance and crash risk associated with the use of cellular telephones while driving. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design. DA ’05, Rockport, Maine, USA (pp. 478–485). http://drivingassessment.uiowa.edu/DA2005/PDF/70_Cairdformat.pdf.

  • Caird, J. K., Willness, C. R., Steel, P., & Scialfa, C. (2008). A meta-analysis of the effects of cell phones on driver performance. In Accident Analysis and Prevention, 40(4), 1282–1293. ISSN: 0001-4575. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2008.01.009.

  • Canada Safety Council/Conseil canadien de la sécurité. Canada Safety Council/Conseil canadien de la sécurité. http://www.safetycouncil.org/info/traffic/distract.html.

  • Carsten, O., Lai, F. C. H., Barnard, Y., Jamson, A. H., & Merat, N. (2012). Control task substitution in semiautomated driving: Does it matter what aspects are automated? In Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 54(5), 747–761. doi:10.1177/0018720812460246.

  • Charissis, V., Papanastasiou, S., & Vlachos, G. (2009). Interface development for early notification warning system: Full windshield head-up display case study. In J. A. Jacko (Ed.), Human-Computer Interaction. Interacting in Various Application Domains: 13th International Conference, HCI International 2009, San Diego, CA, USA, July 19–24, 2009, Proceedings, Part IV (pp. 683–692). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. ISBN: 978-3-642-02583-9. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-02583-9_74.

  • Cohen, A. S., & Hirsig, R. (1990). Zur Bedeutung des fovealen Sehens für die Informationsaufnahme bei hoher Beanspruchung. In Sicht und Sicherheit im Straßenverkehr (pp. 47–58). Cologne, Germany: Verlag TÜV Rheinland GmbH. ISBN: 3-88585-867-3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities. (2007). Commission Rcommendation of 22 December 2006 on safe and efficient in-vehicle in formation and communication systems: Update of the European Statement of Principles on human machine interface (2007/78/EC). In Official Journal of the Europe, 50(L32), 200–241. ISSN: 1725-2555. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv:OJ.L.2007.032.01.0200.01.ENG.

  • Cook, R. I., Woods, D. D., Mccolligan, E., & Howie, M. B. (1991). Cognitive consequences of clumsy automation on high workload, high consequence human performance. In Fourth Annual Workshop on Space Operations Applications and Research. SOAR 90 (pp. 543–543). http://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19910011398.

  • Coughlin, J. F., Reimer, B., & Mehler, B. (2009). Driver wellness, safety and the development of an awarecar. Technical report. Cambridge, MA, USA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. http://web.mit.edu/reimer/www/pdfs/coughlinwellness2009.pdf.

  • Crundall, D., Bains, M., Chapman, P., & Underwood, G. (2005). Regulating conversation during driving: A problem for mobile telephones? In Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 8(3), 197–211. ISSN: 1369-8478. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2005.01.003.

  • Cyganski, R., Fradedrich, E., & Lenz, B. (2015). Travel-time valuation for automated driving: A use-case-driven study. In Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, 15(4259), 11–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Waard, D. (1996). The measurement of drivers’ mental workload. Ph.D. thesis. Haren, The Netherlands: University of Groningen. ISBN: 90- 6807-308-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Transportation and National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. (2013). Visual-manual NHTSA driver distraction guidelines for in vehicle electronic device. In Federal Register, 78(81), 24817–24890. https://federalregister.gov/a/2013-09883.

  • Dingus, T. A., Klauer, S. G., Neale, V. L., Petersen A., Lee, S. E., Sudweeks, J., et al. (2006). The 100-car naturalistic driving study, phase II—Results of the 100-car field experiment. Technical report, DOT HS 810 593. Washington, DC, USA: National Highway Transportation Safety Administration. http://www.nhtsa.gov/DOT/NHTSA/NRD/Multimedia/PDFs/Crash traction/100CarMain.pdf.

  • Direct Line (Motor Insurance). (2002). The mobile phone report: A report on the effects of using a hand-held and a hands-free mobile phone on road safety. In United Kingdom: Direct Line Insurance Croydon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donmez, B., Boyle, L., & Lee, J. D. (2008). Designing feedback to mitigate distraction. In M. A. Regan, J. D. Lee, K. L. Young (Eds.), Driver distraction theory, effects, and mitigation (Chap. 29, pp. 519–531). Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press. ISBN: 978-1- 4200-0749-7. doi:10.1201/9781420007497.ch29.

  • Findlay, J. M., & Gilchrist, I. D. (2003). Active vision: The psychology of looking and seeing. Oxford University Press, 41(08). doi:10.5860/choice.41-4646. REFERENCES 27

  • Fisher, D. L., Laurie, N. E., Glaser, R., Connerney, K., Pollatsek, A., Duffy, S. A., & Brock, J. (2002). Use of a fixed-base driving simulator to evaluate the effects of experience and PC-based risk awareness training on drivers’ decisions. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 44(2), 287–302. doi:10.1518/0018720024497853.

  • Flannagan, M., & Harrison, A. K. (1994). The effects of automobile head-up display location for younger and older drivers. Report No. UMTRI-94-22. Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, S., & Hoffman, M. (2002). Escalation behavior as a specific case of goal-directed activity: A persistence paradigm. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 24(4), 273–285. doi:10.1207/s15324834basp2404_3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, R. (2011). Chapter 2—Driver control theory: From task difficulty homeostasis to risk allostasis. In B. E. Porter (Ed.), Handbook of traffic psychology (pp. 13–26). San Diego: Academic Press. ISBN: 978-0-12-381984-0. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-381984-0.10002-5.

  • Fuller, R. (1984). A conceptualization of driving behaviour as threat avoidance. Ergonomics, 27(11), 1139–1155. doi:10.1080/00140138408963596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, R. (2000). The task-capability interface model of the driving process. Recherche—Transports—Sécurité, 66, 47–57. doi:10.1016/s0761-8980(00)90006-2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, R. (2005). Towards a general theory of driver behaviour. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 37(3), 461–472. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2004.11.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabbard, J. L., Fitch, G. M., & Kim, H. (2014). Behind the glass: Driver challenges and opportunities for ar automotive applications. Proceedings of the IEEE, 102(2), 124–136. ISSN: 0018-9219. doi:10.1109/JPROC.2013.2294642.

  • Gawron, V. J. (2008). Human workload. In Human performance, workload, and situational awareness measures handbook (2nd ed., Chap. 3, pp. 87–230). CRC Press. ISBN: 978-1-4200-6450-6. doi:10.1201/9781420064506.ch3.

  • Gish, K. W., & Staplin, L. (1995). Human factors aspects of using head up displays in automobiles: A review of the literature. In Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) (report no: DOT HS 808 320).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladstones, W. H., Regan, M. A., & Lee, R. B. (1989). Division of attention: The single-channel hypothesis revisited. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 41(1), 1–17. doi:10.1080/14640748908402350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gold, C., & Bengler, K. (2014). Taking over control from highly automated vehicles. In N. A. Stanton, S. Landry, G. Di Bucchianico, A. Vallicelli (Eds.), Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation: Part II. AHFE Conference (pp. 64–69). ISBN: 978-1-4951- 2098-5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, A., Kirley, B., Sandt, L., Hall, W., Thomas, L., O’Brien, N., & Summerlin, D. (2013). Countermeasures that work: A highway safety countermeasure guide for state highway safety offices. Technical report DOT HS 811 727. Washington, DC, USA: University of North Carolina Highway Safety Research Center. http://www.nhtsa.gov/staticfiles/nti/pdf/811727.pdf.

  • Green, P. A. (2008). Driver interface safety and usability standards: An overview. In M. A. Regan, K. L. Young, J. D. Lee (Eds.), Driver distraction theory, effects, and mitigation (Chap. 25, pp. 445–461). Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press. doi:10.1201/9781420007497.ch25.

  • Green, P. A. (2012). Motor vehicle-driver interfaces. In J. A. Jacko (Ed.), Human-computer interaction. fundamentals, evolving technologies, and emerging applications (3rd ed., Chap. 32, pp. 749–770). Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press. ISBN: 978-1-4398-2943-1. doi:10.1201/b11963-37.

  • Green, M. (2000). How long does it take to stop? Methodological analysis of driver perception-brake times. Transportation Human Factors, 2(3), 195–216. doi:10.1207/sthf0203_1.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Haeuslschmid, R., Pfleging, B., & Alt, F. (2016). A design space to support the development of windshield applications for the car. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI ’16 (pp. 5076–5091). Santa Clara, California, USA: ACM. ISBN: 978-1-4503-3362-7. doi:10.1145/2858036.2858336.

  • Haeuslschmid, R., Schnurr, L., Wagner, J., & Butz, A. (2015). Contact-analog warnings on windshield displays promote monitoring the road scene. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications. Automotive UI ’15 (pp. 64–71). Nottingham, United Kingdom: ACM. ISBN: 978-1-4503-3736-6. doi:10.1145/2799250.2799274.

  • Haines, R. F. (1991). Presbyopia research: From molecular biology to visual adaptation. In: G. Obrecht, L.W. Stark (Eds.), A breakdown in simultaneous information processing (pp. 171–175). Boston, MA: Springer. ISBN: 978-1-4757-2131-7. doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2131-7_17.

  • Hancock, P., Mouloua, M., & Senders, J. (2008). On the philosophical foundations of the distracted driver and driving distraction. In M. A. Regan, J. D. Lee, K. L. Young (Eds.), Driver distraction theory, effects, and mitigation (Chap. 2, pp. 11–30). Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press. ISBN: 978-1-4200-0749-7. doi:10.1201/9781420007497.pt2.

  • Harbluk, J. L., Burns, P. C., Hernandez, S., Tam, J., & Glazduri, V. (2013). Detection response tasks: Using remote, headmounted and tactile signals to assess cognitive demand while driving. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design. DA ’13, Bolton Landing, NY, USA (pp. 78–84). http://drivingassessment.uiowa.edu/sites/default/files/DA2013/Papers/013_Harbluk_0.pdf.

  • Hart, S. G., & Stavenland, L. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task load index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In P. A. Hancock, N. Meshkati (Eds.), Human mental workload (Vol. 52, pp. 139–183). North-Holland. doi:10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62386-9.

  • Hurts, K., Angell, L. S., & Perez, M. A. (2011). The distracted driver: Mechanisms, models, and measurement. Reviews of Human Factors and Ergonomics, 7(1), 3–57. doi:10.1177/1557234x11410387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Organization for Standardization. (2003). Road vehicles—Ergonomic aspects of transport information and control systems - Procedure for assessing suitability for use while driving. ISO 17287:2003. Geneve, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Japan Automobile Manufactures Association. (2004). JAMA: Guideline for invehicle display systems—Version 3.0. Technical report, Japan Automobile Manufactures Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalat, J. W. (2004). Biological psychology. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane, M. J., Brown, L. H., Mcvay, J. C., Silvia, J., Myin-Germeys, I., & Kwapil, T. R. (2007). For Whom the mindwanders, and when: An experience-sampling study of working memory and executive control in daily life. Psychological Science, 18(7), 614–621. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01948.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirchner, W. K. (1958). Age differences in short-term retention of rapidly changing information. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55(4), 352–358. doi:10.1037/h0043688. Apr.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knapper, A., Hagenzieker, M., & Karel, B. (2012). Driver distraction from some theoretical perspectives. Delft, Netherlands: Faculty of Technology, Policy, Management, Department of Transport, and Logistics, Delft University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, A. F. (1990). Physiological metrics of mental workload: A review of recent progress. Technical report, ADA223701. San Diego, CA, USA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center. http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADA223701.

  • Lamme, V. A. F. (2005). The difference between visual attention and awareness: A cognitive neuroscience perspective. In Neurobiology of attention (pp. 167–174). doi:10.1016/b978-012375731-9/50033-1.

  • Lee, J. D. (2004). Dynamics of driver distraction: The process of engaging and disengaging. Annals of Advances in Automotive Medicine, 58, 24–32. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4001670/.

  • Lee, J. D., Regan, M. A., & Young, K. L. (2008a). What drives distraction? Distraction as a breakdown of multilevel control. In M. A. Regan, J. D. Lee, K. L. Young (Eds.), Driver distraction theory, effects, and mitigation (Chap. 4, pp. 41–56). Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press. ISBN: 978-1-4200-0749-7. doi:10.1201/9781420007497.ch4.

  • Lee, J. D., Young, K. L., & Regan, M. A. (2008b). Defining driver distraction. In M. A. Regan, J. D. Lee, K. L. Young (Eds.), Driver distraction theory, effects, and mitigation (Chap. 3, pp. 31–40). Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press. ISBN: 978-1-4200-0749-7. doi:10.1201/9781420007497.ch3.

  • Lee, J. D., Roberts, S. C., Hoffman, J. D., & Angell, L. S. (2012). Scrolling and driving: How an MP3 player and its aftermarket controller affect driving performance and visual behavior. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 54(2), 250–263. doi:10.1177/0018720811429562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. D., & Strayer, D. L. (2004). Preface to the special section on driver distraction. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 46(4), 583–586. doi:10.1518/hfes.46.4.583.56811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, Y., Lee, J. D., & Yekhshatyan, L. (2012). How dangerous is looking away from the road? Algorithms predict crash risk from glance patterns in naturalistic driving. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 54(6), 1104–1116. doi:10.1177/0018720812446965.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mack, A., & Rock, I. (1998). Inattention blindness. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann, R. S., Foyle, D. C., & Johnston, J. C. (1993). Attentional limitations with head-up displays. In R. S. Jensen (Ed.), Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (pp. 70–75).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mccarley, J. S., Vais, M. J., Pringle, H., Kramer, A. F., Irwin, D. E., & Strayer, D. L. (2004). Conversation disrupts change detection in complex traffic scenes. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 46(3), 424–436. doi:10.1518/hfes.46.3.424.3784.

  • McEvoy, S. P., Stevenson, M. R., & Woodward, M. (2006). The impact of driver distraction on road safety: Results from a representative survey in two Australian states. Injury Prevention, 12(4), 242–247. doi:10.1136/ip.2006.012336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKiernan, K. A., D’Angelo, B. R., Kaufman, J. N., & Binder, J. R. (2006). Interrupting the “stream of consciousness”: An fMRI investigation. NeuroImage, 29(4), 1185–1191. ISSN: 1053-8119. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.09.030.

  • McKnight, A. J., & Adams, B. B. (1970). Driver education task analysis: Volume I: Task descriptions. Alexandria: VA: Human Resources Research Organization, Final Report, Contract No FH 11-7336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehler, B., Reimer, B., Coughlin, J. F., & Dusek, J. (2009). Impact of incremental increases in cognitive workload on physiological arousal and performance in young adult drivers. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2138, 6–12. doi:10.3141/2138-02.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michon, J. A. (1985). A critical view of driver behavior models: What do we know, what should we do? Human Behavior and Traffic Safety, 485–524. doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-2173-6_19.

  • Miller, S. (2001). Literature review. Workload measures. Technical report, N01-006. Iowa City, IA, USA: University of Iowa. http://www.nads-sc.uiowa.edu/publicationStorage/200501251347060.N01-006.pdf.

  • Morris, A., Reed, S., Welsh, R., Brown, L., & Birrell, S. (2015). Distraction effects of navigation and green-driving systems—Results from field operational tests (FOTs) in the UK. European Transport Research Review, 7(3), 1–9. ISSN: 1866-8887. doi:10.1007/s12544-015-0175-3.

  • Näätäänen, R., & Summala, H. (1974). A model for the role of motivational factors in drivers’ decision-making. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 6(3–4), 243–261. doi:10.1016/0001-4575(74)90003-7.

  • Neale, V. L., Dingus, T. A., Klauer, S. G., Sudweeks, J., & Goodman, M. (2005). Driven to distraction: An overview of the 100-car naturalistic driving study and findings. Washington, DC. http://www.nhtsa.gov/DOT/NHTSA/NRD/Multimedia/PDFs/Crash.

  • Nowakowski, C., Green, P. A., & Friedman, D. (2002). An experimental evaluation of using automotive HUDs to reduce driver distraction while answering cell phones. 46(22), 1819–1823. doi:10.1177/154193120204602209.

  • Olsen, E. C. B., Lerner, N., Perel, M., & Simons-Morton, B. G. (2005). In-car electronic device use among teen drivers. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Regan, J. K., & Noë, A. (2001). A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences Behavioural Brain Sciences, 24(05), 939–973. doi:10.1017/s0140525x01000115.

  • Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116(2), 220–244. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.116.2.220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauzié, A. (2014). Evaluation of the driver’s mental workload: A necessity in a perspective of iIn-vehicle system design for road safety improvement. Cognition, Technology and Work, 16(3), 299–302. ISSN: 1435- 5558. doi:10.1007/s10111-014-0276-0.

  • Pettitt, M., Burnett, G. E., & Stevens, A. (2005). Defining driver distraction. In Proceedings of the 12th ITS World Congress, San Francisco, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfleging, B., Rang, M., & Broy, N. (2016). Investigating user needs for non-driving-related activities during automated driving. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (MUM’ 16). Rovaniemi, Finland, December 12-15, 2016 (pp. 91–99). New York, NY, USA: ACM. ISBN: 978-1-4503-4860-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3012709.3012735.

  • Pfleging, B., & Schmidt, A. (2015). (Non-) Driving-related activities in the car: Defining driver activities for manual and automated driving. In Workshop on Experiencing Autonomous Vehicles: Crossing the Boundaries between a Drive and a Ride at CHI ’15, Seoul, South Korea.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfleging, B., Schneegass, S., & Schmidt, A. (2013). Exploring user expectations for context and road video sharing while calling and drivings. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Eindhoven, Netherlands. AutomotiveUI ’13 (pp. 132–139). New York, NY, USA: ACM. ISBN: 978-1-4503-2478-6. doi:10.1145/2516540.2516547.

  • Rajalin, S., & Summala, H. (1997). What surviving drivers learn from a fatal road accident. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 29(3), 277–283. doi:10.1016/s0001-4575(96)00081-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranney, T. A. (2008). Driver distraction: A review of the current state-of- knowledge. Technical report, DOT HS 810 787. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 2008. http://www.nhtsa.gov/DOT/NHTSA/NRD/Multimedia/PDFs/Crash+Avoidance/2008/810787.pdf.

  • Ranney, T. A., Mazzae, E., Garrott, R., & Goodman, M. J. (2000). NHTSA driver distraction research: Past, present, and future. Technical report, Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 2000. http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/departments/Human+Factors/driver-distraction/PDF/233.PDF.

  • Rasmussen, J. (1997). Risk management in a dynamic society: A modelling problem. Safety Science, 27(2–3), 183–213. doi:10.1016/s0925-7535(97)00052-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redelmeier, D. A., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1997). Association between Cellular-telephone calls and motor vehicle collisions. New England Journal of Medicine, 336(7), 453–458. PMID: 9017937. doi:10.1056/NEJM199702133360701.

  • Regan, M. A., Hallett, C., & Gordon, C. P. (2011). Driver distraction and driver inattention: Definition, relationship and taxonomy. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 43(5), 1771–1781. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2011.04.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rensink, R. A. (2002). Change detection. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 245–277. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roscoe, A. H., & Ellis, G. A. (1990). A subjective rating scale for assessing pilot workload in flight: A decade of dractical use. Technical report, RAE TR 90019. Bedford, UK: Royal Aerospace Establishment. http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a227864.pdf.

  • SAE International. (2014). Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to on-road motor vehicle automated driving systems. SAE J3016_201401. Warrendale, PA, USA: SAE International. http://standards.sae.org/j3016_201401/.

  • SAE International. (2015). Operational definitions of driving performance measures and statistics. SAE J2944_201506. Warrendale, PA, USA: SAE International, Jun. 2015. http://standards.sae.org/j2944_201506/.

  • Santos, J., Merat, N., Mouta, S., Brookhuis, K., & de Waard, D. (2005). The interaction between driving and in-vehicle information systems: Comparison of results from laboratory, simulator and real-world studies. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 8(2). The relationship between distraction and driving performance: Towards a test regime for in-vehicle information systemsIn-vehicle information systems, 135–146. ISSN: 1369-8478. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2005.04.001.

  • Sayer, J. R., Devonshire, J. M., & Flannagan, C. A. (2005). The effects of secondary tasks on naturalistic driving performance. Report No. UMTRI-2005-29. Ann Arbor, Michigan: The University of Michigan, Transportation Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schindhelm, R., Gelau, C., Keinath, A., Bengler, K., Kussmann, H., Kompfner, P., et al. (2004). Report on the review of the available guidelines and standards. Technical report, IST-1-507674-IP D43.1. Information Society Technologies (IST) Programme—AIDE—Adaptive Integrated Driver-vehicle InterfacE. http://www.aide-eu.org/pdf/sp4_deliv_new/aide_d4_3_1.pdf.

  • Schoettle, B., & Sivak, M. (2014). A survey of public opinion about autonomous and self-driving vehicles in the U.S., the U.K., and Australia. Technical report, UMTRI-2014-21. Ann Arbor, MI, USA: The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senders, J., & Kristofferson, A. (1966). The attentional demand of automobile driving. Highway Research Record (Vol. 195, pp. 15–33).

    Google Scholar 

  • Seo, D.-C., & Torabi, M. (2004). The impact of in-vehicle cell-phone use on accidents or near-accidents among college students. Journal of American College Health, 53(3), 101–108. doi:10.3200/jach.53.3.101-108.

  • Sivak, M., & Schoettle, B. (2015). Motion sickness in self-driving vehicles. Technical report UMTRI-2015-12. Ann Arbor, MI, USA: The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strayer, D. L., Cooper, J. M., Turrill, J., Coleman, J. R., & Hopman, R. J. (2015). Measuring cognitive distraction in the automobile III: A comparison of ten 2015 in-vehicle information systems. Technical report, Washington, DC, USA: University of Utah. http://newsroom.aaa.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Phase-IIIResearch-Report.pdf.

  • Strayer, D. L., Cooper, J. M., Turrill, J., Coleman, J. R., & Hopman, R. J. (2015). The smartphone and the driver’s cognitive workload: A comparison of Apple, Google, and Microsoft’s intelligent personal assistants. Technical report, Washington, DC, USA: University of Utah. http://newsroom.aaa.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Phase-III-Research-Report.pdf.

  • Strayer, D. L., Drews, F. A., & Johnston, W. A. (2003). Cell phone induced failures of visual attention during simulated driving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 9(1), 23–32. doi:10.1037/1076-898x.9.1.23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strayer, D. L., & Johnston, W. A. (2001). Driven to distraction: Dual-task studies of simulated driving and conversing on a cellular telephone. Psychological Science, 12(6), 462–466. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00386.

  • Stutts, J., Feaganes, J., Rodgman, E., Hamlett, C., Gish, K., Mercandante, M., et al. (2003). The causes and consequences of distraction in everyday driving. In 47th Annual Proceedings/Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine (pp. 235–251).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stutts, J., Knipling, R. R., Pfefer, R., Neumann, T. R., Slack, K. R., & Hardy, K. K. (2005). Guidance for implementation of the AASHTO strategic highway safety plan: A guide for reducing crashes involving drowsy and distracted drivers. Technical report, NCHRP Report 500. Transportation Research Board. http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrp_rpt_500v14.pdf.

  • Stutts, J., Feaganes, J., Reinfurt, D., Rodgman, E., Hamlett, C., Gish, K., et al. (2005). Driver’s exposure to distractions in their natural driving environment. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 37(6), 1093–1101. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2005.06.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Summala, H. (1988). Risk control is not risk adjustment: the zero-risk theory of driver behaviour and its implications. Ergonomics, 31(4), 491–506. doi:10.1080/00140138808966694.

  • Svenson, O. (1981). Are we all less risky and more skillful than our fellow drivers? Acta Psychologica, 47(2), 143–148. doi:10.1016/0001-6918(81)90005-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takayama, L., & Nass, C. (2008). Assessing the effectiveness of interactive media in improving drowsy driver safety. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 50(5), 772–781. doi:10.1518/001872008X312341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, D. H. (1964). Drivers’ galvanic skin response and the risk of accident. Ergonomics, 7(4), 439–451. doi:10.1080/00140136408930761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tison, J., Chaudhary, N., & Cosgrove, L. (2011). National phone survey on distracted driving attitudes and behaviors. In PsycEXTRA. doi:10.1037/e562822012-001.

  • Treat, J. R. (1980). A study of precrash factors involved in traffic accidents. The HSRI Review, 10(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Trent, V. (2005). Keeping eye and mind on the road. Uppsala University. ISBN: 91-554-6425-4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wann, J. P., Swapp, D., & Rushton, S. K. (2000). Heading perception and the allocation of attention. Vision Research, 40(18), 2533–2543. doi:10.1016/s0042-6989(00)00115-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weintraub, D. J. (1987). HUDs, HMDs and common sense: Polishing virtual images. Human Factors Society Bulletin, 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickens, C. D., & Horrey ,W. (2008). Models of attention, distraction, and highway hazard avoidance. In M. A. Regan, J. D. Lee, K. L. Young (Eds.), Driver distraction theory, effects, and mitigation (pp. 57–69). Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press. ISBN: 978- 1-4200-0749-7. doi:10.1201/9781420007497.ch5.

  • Wickens, C. D., & Tsang, P. S. (2015). Workload. In D. A. Boehm-Davis, F. T. Durso, J. D. Lee (Eds.), APA handbook of human systems integration (Chap. 18, pp. 277–292). APA handbooks in psychology. Washington, DC, USA: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/14528-018.

  • Wickens, Christopher D. (2002). Multiple resources and performance prediction. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 3(2), 159–177. doi:10.1080/14639220210123806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wickens, C. D. (2008). Multiple resources and mental workload. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 50(3), 449–455. doi:10.1518/001872008X288394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wierwille, W. W. (1993). An initial model of visual sampling of in-car displays and controls. Amsterdam: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) (report no: DOT HS 808 320) (pp. 271–282).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wierwille, W. W. (1993). Demands on driver resources associated with introducing advanced technology into the vehicle. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 1(2), 133–142. ISSN: 0968-090X. doi:10.1016/0968-090X(93)90010-D.

  • Yerkes, R. M., & Dodson, J. D. (1908). The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit-formation. Journal of Comparative Neurology and Psychology, 18, 459–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, K. L., Lee, J. D., & Regan, M. A. (2008). Defining driver distraction. In K. Young, J. D. Lee, M. A. Regan (Eds.), Driver distraction theory, effects, and mitigation (Chap. 3, pp. 31–40). Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press ISBN: 978-1-4200-0749-7. doi:10.1201/9781420007497.ch3.

  • Young, K. L., Regan, M., & Hammer, M. (2003). Driver distraction: A review of the literature. Technical report, 206. Monash University: Accident Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, K. L., Regan, M. A., & Lee, J. D. (2008). Factors moderating the impact of distraction on driving performance and safety. In M. A. Regan, J. D. Lee, K. L. Young (Eds.), Driver distraction theory, effects, and mitigation (Chap. 19, pp. 335–351). Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press. ISBN: 978-1-4200-0749-7. doi:10.1201/9781420007497.pt6.

  • Young, M. S., & Stanton, N. A. (2002). Malleable attentional resources theory: a new explanation for the effects of mental underload on performance. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 44(3), 365–375. doi:10.1518/0018720024497709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yung-Ching, L., & Ming-Hui, W. (2004). Comparison of head-up display (HUD) vs. head-down display (HDD): Driving performance of commercial vehicle operators in Taiwan. 61(5), 679–697. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2004.06.002.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Lehrstuhl für Mensch-Maschine-Interaktion, Amalienstr. 17, 80333, Munich, Germany

    Renate Häuslschmid, Bastian Pfleging & Andreas Butz

Authors
  1. Renate Häuslschmid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bastian Pfleging
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Andreas Butz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Renate Häuslschmid .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. UniTyLab, Heilbronn University, Heilbronn, Germany

    Gerrit Meixner

  2. Automotive IUI, German Research Centre for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI), Saarbrücken, Germany

    Christian Müller

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Häuslschmid, R., Pfleging, B., Butz, A. (2017). The Influence of Non-driving-Related Activities on the Driver’s Resources and Performance. In: Meixner, G., Müller, C. (eds) Automotive User Interfaces. Human–Computer Interaction Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49448-7_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49448-7_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-49447-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-49448-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation