Skip to main content

Decentralized Leadership

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Theory of Externalities and Public Goods

Abstract

This paper studies the efficiency of decentralized leadership in federal settings in which selfish regional governments provide regional and federal public goods and the benevolent central government implements interregional earmarked and income transfers. In the simpler model without residential mobility, unlimited decentralized leadership is efficient only if the center implements redistributive interregional income and earmarked transfers to equate consumption of private and regional public goods across regions. Such policies perfectly align the incentives of the selfish regional governments. In the extended model with imperfect residential mobility, due to regional attachment, decentralized leadership is efficient if the center adopts the redistributive interregional income and earmarked policies and there is a common labor market in the federation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See, e.g., Silva (2015, 2017). These papers provide ample evidence of the importance of interregional earmarked and income transfers in several federations.

  2. 2.

    See Cornes and Itaya (2010) for an interesting study of voluntary contributions to multiple pure public goods. The authors show that the provision levels in equilibrium are too low (relative to efficient levels), among other things.

  3. 3.

    Please see Silva (2014, 2015) and Silva and Lucas (2016) for important contributions to fiscal federalism in the areas of decentralized leadership, earmarking and soft budgets, and imperfect residential mobility due to regional attachment, respectively.

  4. 4.

    The Inada conditions guarantee that both regions are populated in equilibrium.

  5. 5.

    For simplicity, I omit rental income sources that residents obtain from supplying fixed inputs (say, land and capital) in the market. If each resident of region i is endowed with equal supplies of region i’s fixed resources, equation (28) would remain the same: the rental incomes would exactly cancel out with the amounts spent by the firms to hire such resources. Thus, the analysis in the text is consistent with the assumption that regional residents are equally endowed with all regional resources.

  6. 6.

    Silva and Lucas (2016) show that the subgame perfect equilibrium for the decentralized leadership game is the same whether government authorities take migration responses into account or consider the population distribution as given. To simplify exposition, the government authorities take the population distribution as given in the current setting.

References

  • Becker, G. S. (1981). A treatise on the family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergstrom, T. (1989). A fresh look at the rotten kid theorem—And other household mysteries. Journal of Political Economy, 97, 1138–1159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, A., Cornes, R. C., & Silva, E. C. D. (2000). Pure public goods and income redistribution in a federation with decentralized leadership and imperfect labor mobility. Journal of Public Economics, 77, 265–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornes, R. C. (1993). Dyke maintenance and other stories: Some neglected types of public goods. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108, 259–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornes, R., & Hartley, R. (2007). Weak links, good shots and other public good games: Building on BBV. Journal of Public Economics, 91, 1684–1907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornes, R. C., & Itaya, J.-I. (2010). On the private provision of two or more public goods. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 12, 363–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornes, R. C., Itaya, J.-I., & Tanaka, A. (2012). Private provision of public goods between families. Journal of Population Economics, 25, 1451–1480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornes, R. C., & Silva, E. C. D. (1999). Rotten kids, purity and perfection. Journal of Political Economy, 107, 1034–1040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva, E. C. D. (2014). Selective decentralized leadership. Journal of Urban Economics, 83, 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva, E. C. D. (2015). Efficient earmarking under decentralized fiscal commitments. International Tax and Public Finance, 22, 683–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva, E. C. D. (2016). Tax competition and federal equalization schemes with decentralized leadership. International Tax and Public Finance. doi:10.1007/s10797-016-9402-7

  • Silva, E. C. D., & Lucas, V. M. (2016). Common labor market, attachment and spillovers in a large metropolis,”. International Tax and Public Finance, 23, 693–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emilson Caputo Delfino Silva .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Silva, E.C.D. (2017). Decentralized Leadership. In: Buchholz, W., Rübbelke, D. (eds) The Theory of Externalities and Public Goods. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49442-5_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics