Skip to main content

Policy Actors, Advocates, and Critics: The Promotion and Critique of Performance and Outcomes-Based Funding’s Impact on Equity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Outcomes Based Funding and Race in Higher Education

Abstract

This chapter reviews data from a qualitative interview study conducted with POBF advocates and critics from various organizations focused on higher education, campus leaders, and academic researchers. As more states move toward substantial POBF formulas, it is crucial to understand how these policies work to advantage or disadvantage our most vulnerable student populations. In this chapter, we explore higher education leaders’ insights and experiences with POBF, specifically targeting leaders who have been publicly vocal about the ways the policies have helped or inhibited equity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Boland, W. C. (2016). The impact of performance-based funding on Historically Black Colleges and Universities. In R. L. Ford & C. B. W. Prince (Eds.), Administrative challenges and organizational leadership in Historically Black Colleges and Universities (pp.151–178). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, N. W., Tandberg, D. A., & Gross, J. P. (2014). Performance funding in higher education: Do financial incentives impact college completions? The Journal of Higher Education, 85(6), 826–857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. (2014). POBF at MSIs: Considerations and possible measures for public Minority-Serving Institutions. Atlanta, GA: Southern Education Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon, J. W. (2011). Agendas, alternatives and public policies. New York, NY: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLendon, M. K., Hearn, J. C., & Deaton, R. (2006). Called to account: Analyzing the origins and spread of state performance-accountability policies for higher education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 28(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Conference of State Legislatures. (2015). Performance-based funding for higher education. Retrieved from http://www.ncsl.org/research/education/performance-funding.aspx

  • Olson, K. (2011). Essentials of qualitative interviewing. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. (1990). Purposeful sampling. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, 2, 169–186.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jones, T., Jones, S., Elliott, K.C., Russell Owens, L., Assalone, A.E., Gándara, D. (2017). Policy Actors, Advocates, and Critics: The Promotion and Critique of Performance and Outcomes-Based Funding’s Impact on Equity. In: Outcomes Based Funding and Race in Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49436-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49436-4_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-49435-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-49436-4

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics