Abstract
Performing nonpenetrating glaucoma procedures (NPGS) requires a high level of skill. The proposed advantages of NPGS have to be considered in context of the long learning curve and the complications. Inadequate dissection of the filtration membrane, the trabeculo-Descemet’s membrane (TDM) is not uncommon and may result in filtration failure. Intraoperative perforations of the TDM make the procedure similar to a trabeculectomy with the attendant risks. Complications after a routine NPGS procedure are rare and self-limiting. Early hypotony after deep sclerectomy (DS), a conjunctival bleb-dependent NPGS procedure should not be considered a complication. Viscocanaloplasty and canaloplasty (VCT), nonbleb dependent NPGS procedures, often have transient hyphema in the immediate postoperative period due to Schlemm’s canal manipulation. DS procedures have bleb-related complications similar to trabeculectomy. Adjunctive use of mitomycin C may increase the risk of bleb-related infections and hypotony. Detachment of the Descemet’s membrane is an uncommon complication s and may result in failure of the procedure. Laser goniopuncture (LGP) is often performed after DS and can reestablish filtration in a significant majority of eyes. The sudden lowering of IOP after LGP may result in choroidal detachments and suprachoroidal hemorrhage. LGP also increases the risk of iris incarceration and occasionally acute, symptomatic IOP elevation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Al Obeidan SA. Incidence, efficacy and safety of YAG laser goniopuncture following nonpenetrating deep sclerectomy at a university hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2015;29:95–102.
Alnahrawy O, Blumenstock G, Ziemssen F, Szurman P, Leitritz MA, Dimopoulos S, Voykov B. Exit strategies in canaloplasty: intraoperative conversion into 180-degree trabeculotomy or 360-degree trabeculotomy in cases of unsuccessful catheterisation of Schlemm’s canal: influence of degree of canal cleavage. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2015;253(5):779–84. doi: 10.1007/s00417-015-2955-9. Epub 2015 Feb 18.
Alp MN, Yarangumeli A, Koz OG, Kural G. Nd:YAG laser goniopuncture in viscocanalostomy: penetration in non-penetrating glaucoma surgery. Int Ophthalmol. 2010;30(3):245–52. doi:10.1007/s10792-009-9312-0.
Anand N, Atherley C. Deep sclerectomy augmented with mitomycin C. Eye (Lond). 2005;19(4):442–50. doi:10.1038/sj.eye.6701403.
Anand N, Bong C. Deep sclerectomy with bevacizumab and mitomycin C: a comparative study. J Glaucoma. 2015;24(1):25–31. doi:10.1097/IJG.0b013e3182883c0c.
Anand N, Pilling R. Nd:YAG laser goniopuncture after deep sclerectomy: outcomes. Acta Ophthalmol. 2010;88(1):110–5. doi:10.1111/j.1755-3768.2008.01494.x.
Anand N, Kumar A, Gupta A. Primary phakic deep sclerectomy augmented with mitomycin C: long-term outcomes. J Glaucoma. 2011;20(1):21–7. doi:10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181ccb926.
Ayyala RS, Chaudhry AL, Okogbaa CB, et al. Comparison of surgical outcomes between canaloplasty and trabeculectomy at 12 months’ follow-up. Ophthalmology. 2011;118:2427–33.
Barnebey HS. Canaloplasty with intraoperative low dosage mitomycin C: a retrospective case series. J Glaucoma. 2013;22(3):201–4. doi:10.1097/IJG.0b013e31824083fb.
Carassa RG, Bettin P, Fiori M, Brancato R. Viscocanalostomy versus trabeculectomy in white adults affected by open-angle glaucoma: a 2-year randomized, controlled trial. Ophthalmology. 2003;110(5):882–7. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00081-2.
Cillino S, Di Pace F, Casuccio A, et al. Deep sclerectomy versus punch trabeculectomy: effect of low-dosage mitomycin C. Ophthalmologica. 2005;219:281–6.
Cillino S, Di Pace F, Casuccio A, et al. Deep sclerectomy versus trabeculectomy with low-dosage mitomycin C: four-year follow-up. Ophthalmologica. 2008;222:81–7.
Eldaly MA, Bunce C, Elsheikha OZ, Wormald R. Non-penetrating filtration surgery versus trabeculectomy for open-angle glaucoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;2:CD007059. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD007059.pub2.
Grieshaber MC, Fraenkl S, Schoetzau A, Flammer J, Orgül S. Circumferential viscocanalostomy and suture canal distension (canaloplasty) for whites with open-angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2011;20(5):298–302. doi:10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181e3d46e.
Grieshaber MC, Schoetzau A, Flammer J. Orgül SPostoperative microhyphema as a positive prognostic indicator in canaloplasty. Acta Ophthalmol. 2013;91(2):151–6. doi:10.1111/j.1755-3768.2011.02293.x. Epub 2011 Dec 9
The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS): 7. The relationship between control of intraocular pressure and visual field deterioration.The AGIS Investigators. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;130(4):429–40.
Jaramillo A, Foreman J, Ayyala RS. Descemet membrane detachment after canaloplasty: incidence and management. J Glaucoma. 2014;23(6):351–4. doi:10.1097/IJG.0b013e318279ca7f.
Karlen ME, Sanchez E, Schnyder CC, Sickenberg M, Mermoud A. Deep sclerectomy with collagen implant: medium term results. Br J Ophthalmol. 1999;83(1):6–11.
Kobayashi H, Kobayashi K, Okinami S. A comparison of the intraocular pressure-lowering effect and safety of viscocanalostomy and trabeculectomy with mitomycin C in bilateral open-angle glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2003;241(5):359–66. doi:10.1007/s00417-003-0652-6.
Koukkoulli A, Musa F, Anand N. Long-term outcomes of needle revision of failing deep sclerectomy blebs. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2015;253(1):99–106. doi:10.1007/s00417-014-2810-4.
Kozobolis VP, Christodoulakis EV, Tzanakis N, Zacharopoulos I, Pallikaris IG. Primary deep sclerectomy versus primary deep sclerectomy with the use of mitomycin C in primary open-angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2002;11(4):287–93.
Krasnov MM. Externalization of Schlemm’s canal (sinusotomy) in glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 1968;52(2):157–61.
Lewis RA, von Wolff K, Tetz M, Koerber N, Kearney JR, Shingleton BJ, Samuelson TW. Canaloplasty: three-year results of circumferential viscodilation and tensioning of Schlemm canal using a microcatheter to treat open-angle glaucoma. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37(4):682–90. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.10.055.
Luke C, Dietlein TS, Jacobi PC, Konen W, Krieglstein GK. A prospective randomized trial of viscocanalostomy versus trabeculectomy in open-angle glaucoma: a 1-year follow-up study. J Glaucoma. 2002;11(4):294–9.
Mendrinos E, Mermoud A, Shaarawy T. Nonpenetrating glaucoma surgery. Surv Ophthalmol. 2008;53:592–630.
Mermoud A, Karlen ME, Schnyder CC, Sickenberg M, Chiou AG, Hediguer SE, Sanchez E. Nd:Yag goniopuncture after deep sclerectomy with collagen implant. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 1999;30(2):120–5.
O’Brart DP, Shiew M, Edmunds B. A randomised, prospective study comparing trabeculectomy with viscocanalostomy with adjunctive antimetabolite usage for the management of open angle glaucoma uncontrolled by medical therapy. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004;88(8):1012–7. doi:10.1136/bjo.2003.037432.
Ravinet E, Tritten JJ, Roy S, Gianoli F, Wolfensberger T, Schnyder C, Mermoud A. Descemet membrane detachment after nonpenetrating filtering surgery. J Glaucoma. 2002;11(3):244–52.
Rulli E, Biagioli E, Riva I, et al. Efficacy and safety of trabeculectomy vs nonpenetrating surgical procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013;131:1573–82.
Russo V, Scott IU, Stella A, Balducci F, Cosma A, Barone A, Delle Noci N. Nonpenetrating deep sclerectomy with reticulated hyaluronic acid implant versus punch trabeculectomy: a prospective clinical trial. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2008;18(5):751–7.
Sanchez E, Schnyder CC, Mermoud A. Comparative results of deep sclerectomy transformed to trabeculectomy and classical trabeculectomy. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 1997;210(5):261–4. doi:10.1055/s-2008-1035050.
Shaarawy T, Flammer J, Smits G, Mermoud A. Low first postoperative day intraocular pressure as a positive prognostic indicator in deep sclerectomy. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004;88(5):658–61.
Stegmann RC. Visco-canalostomy: a new surgical technique for open angle glaucoma. An Inst Barraquer. 1995;25:229–32.
Stegmann R, Pienaar A, Miller D. Viscocanalostomy for open-angle glaucoma in black African patients. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999;25(3):316–22.
Sponsel WE1, Groth SL. Mitomycin-augmented non-penetrating deep sclerectomy: preoperative gonioscopy and postoperative perimetric, tonometric and medication trends. Br J Ophthalmol. 2013;97(3):357–61. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2012-301886. Epub 2012 Nov 2.
Sunaric-Megevand G, Leuenberger PM. Results of viscocanalostomy for primary open-angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2001;132(2):221–8.
Tamm ER, Carassa RG, Albert DM, Gabelt BT, Patel S, Rasmussen CA, Kaufman PL. Viscocanalostomy in rhesus monkeys. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004 Dec;122(12):1826–38.
Vuori ML. Complications of Neodymium:YAG laser goniopuncture after deep sclerectomy. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2003;81(6):573–6.
Wallin OJ, Montan PG. Blebitis after deep sclerectomy. Eye (Lond). 2007;21(2):258–60. doi:10.1038/sj.eye.6702494.
Yalvac IS, Sahin M, Eksioglu U, Midillioglu IK, Aslan BS, Duman S. Primary viscocanalostomy versus trabeculectomy for primary open-angle glaucoma: three-year prospective randomized clinical trial. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30(10):2050–7. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.02.073.
Yarangümeli A, Köz OG, Alp MN, Elhan AH, Kural G. Viscocanalostomy with mitomycin-C: a preliminary study. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2005;15(2):202–8.
Zimmerman TJ, Kooner KS, Ford VJ, Olander KW, Mandlekorn RM, Rawlings EF, Leader BJ, Koskan AJ. Trabeculectomy vs. nonpenetrating trabeculectomy: a retrospective study of two procedures in phakic patients with glaucoma. Ophthalmic Surg. 1984;15(9):734–40.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cheng, J., Hu, K., Anand, N. (2017). Nonpenetrating Glaucoma Surgery (Deep Sclerectomy, Viscocanaloplasty, and Canaloplasty). In: Carbonaro, F., Lim, K. (eds) Managing Complications in Glaucoma Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49416-6_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49416-6_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-49414-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-49416-6
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)