Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Comprehending and Speaking about Motion in L2 Spanish pp 131–185Cite as

Palgrave Macmillan

Sensitivity to the Path Conflation in Oral L2 Spanish

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

  • 194 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter presents the oral production task. The participants from the receptive task watched silent film clips of a cartoon and retold the stories in L1 English and L2 Spanish to native-speaker interviewers of both languages. Findings were compared with those of the same L1 Spanish control group and submitted to language-group and corpus-based analysis. The two methodologies indicated different trends for the composition of the vocabulary of motion verbs in L2 Spanish and L1 Spanish. While the language-group analysis presented higher percentages of path types than manner across the four groups, the corpus-based analysis revealed that the percentages of path decreased proportionally with the levels of proficiency in L2 Spanish. The L1 Spanish manner types corroborated a similar trend. The preliminary evidence from the corpus-based analysis identifies low-frequency manner (not path) mapped onto verb predicates as an indicator of lexical sophistication in the Spanish vocabulary. This suggests that in connected speech, the expression of motion in Spanish may not rely entirely on high frequencies of path, but rather on a vocabulary that is rich in manner verb types. What this means is that for adult Anglophone learners to acquire mastery of the expression of motion in L2 Spanish, uttering high frequencies of path tokens would only partly enable them to sound idiomatically attuned. The evidence collected in the oral production task seems to indicate that learners need to lexicalize manner verb types while also producing connected speech with multiple repetitions of path tokens.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aronoff, M., & Rees-Miller, J. (Eds.). (2001). The handbook of linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aske, J. (1989). Path predicates in English and Spanish: A closer look. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 15, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berman, R. A., & Slobin, D. I. (1994). Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biber, D. (1999). Investigating language use through corpus-based analyses of association patterns. In M. Barlow & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Usage-based models of language (pp. 287–313). Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Rappen, R. (1998). Corpus linguistics: Investigating language structure and use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein, R., & Masling, J. (1998). Empirical perspectives on the psychoanalytic unconscious. Washington, DC: APA Books.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bowerman, M. (1996). The origins of children’s spatial semantic categories: Cognitive versus linguistic determinants. In J. Gumperz & S. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 145–176). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bybee, J. (1995). Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10, 425–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bybee, J., & Hopper, P. (2001). Introduction to frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. In J. Bybee & P. Hopper (Eds.), Frequency and emergence of linguistic structure (pp. 337–359). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bybee, J., & Thompson, S. (1997). Three frequency effects in syntax. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 23, 378–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cadierno, T. (2004). Expressing motion events in a second language: A cognitive typological perspective. In M. Achard & S. Niemeier (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics, second language acquisition, and foreign language teaching (pp. 13–49). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cadierno, T., & Ruiz, L. (2006). Motion events in Spanish L2 acquisition. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 4(1), 183–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, S., & Bowerman, M. (1991). Learning to express motion events in English and Korean: The influence of language-specific lexicalization patterns. Cognition, 41, 83–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David, A. (2008). Vocabulary breadth in French L2 learners. Language Learning, 36(2), 167–180. doi:10.1080/09571730802389991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donoso, A., & Bylund, E. (2015). The construal of goal-oriented motion events by Swedish speakers of L2 Spanish: Encoding of motion endpoints and manner of motion. In T. Judy & S. Perpiñán (Eds.), The acquisition of Spanish in understudied language pairings (pp. 233–254). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, N. (2002a). Frequency effects in language processing. A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(2), 143–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, N. (2002b). Reflections on frequency effects in language processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(2), 297–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, N. (2004). The processes of second language acquisition. In B. Van Patten, J. Williams, S. Rott, & M. Overstreet (Eds.), Form-meaning connections in second language acquisition (pp. 49–76). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, N. (2008). Usage-based and form-focused language acquisition: The associative learning of constructions, learned attention, and the limited L2 endstate. In P. Robinson & N. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 372–405). New York, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, N., & Schmidt, R. (1997). Morphology and longer distance dependencies. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 145–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R. (1995). Interpretation tasks for grammar teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 29(1), 87–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furniss, M. (1998). Art in motion: Animation aesthetics. Sydney, Australia: John Libbey & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gass, S. M., & Selinker, L. (2008). Second language acquisition: An introductory course. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Givón, T. (1990). Natural language learning and organized language teaching. In H. Burmeister & P. L. Rounds (Eds.), Variability in second language acquisition: Proceedings of the Tenth Meeting of the Second Language Research Forum (pp. 61–84). Department of Linguistics, American English Institute, University of Oregon, Volume 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, G. V., & Hopkins, K. (1996). Statistical methods in education and psychology. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, A. (2006). Constructions at work. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, A., Casenhiser, D., & Sethuraman, N. (2004). Learning argument structure generalizations. Cognitive Linguistics, 14, 289–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopnik, A., & Choi, S. (1995). Names, relational words, and cognitive development in English and Korean speakers: Nouns are not always learned before verbs. In M. Tomasello & W. Merriman (Eds.), Beyond names for things: Young children’s acquisition of verbs (pp. 63–80). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopnik, A., Choi, S., & Baumberger, T. (1996). Crosslinguistic differences in early semantic and cognitive development. Cognitive Development, 11, 197–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gullberg, M. (1999). [Communication strategies, gestures, and grammar] Acquisition et Interaction en Langue E ´trange`re. Paper presented at the 8th EUROSLA Conference, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, C., & Hirst, W. (1988). Frequency encoding of token and type information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 4(2), 289–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henrichsen, L. (1984). Sandhi-variation: A filter of input for learners of ESL. Language Learning, 34, 103–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hohenstein, J., Eisenberg, A., & Naigles, L. (2006). Is he floating across or crossing afloat? Cross-influence of L1 and L2 in Spanish-English bilingual adults. Bilingualism Language and Cognition, 9(3), 249–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hohenstein, J., Naigles, L., & Einsenberg, A. (2004). Keeping verb acquisition in motion: A comparison of English and Spanish. In G. Hall & S. Waxman (Eds.), Weaving a lexicon (pp. 569–602). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellerman, E., & Van Hoof, A. (2003). Manual accents. IRAL, 41, 251–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laufer, B., & Nation, I. S. P. (1995). Vocabulary size and use: Lexical richness in L2 written production. Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 307–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lightbown, P., & Spada, N. (2015). How languages are learned. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littlewood, W. (2014). Communication-oriented language teaching: Where are we now? Where do we go from here? Language Teaching, 47, 349–362. doi:10.1017/S0261444812000134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES project. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, R., Buss, R., Stanley, W., Blanchard-Fields, F., Cho, J., & Druhan, B. (1989). The role of implicit learning from examples: A synergistic effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 1083–1100.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, J. (1987). Sentence interpretation in bilingual speakers of English and Dutch. Applied Psycholinguistics, 8, 379–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, J., & Heilenman, L. K. (1992). Changes in sentence processing as second language proficiency increases. In R. Harris (Ed.), Cognitive processing in bilinguals (pp. 325–336). North-Holland: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McEmery, T., & Wilson, A. (1996). Corpus linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, B., Rossman, T., & McLeod, B. (1983). Second language learning: An information-processing perspective. Language Learning, 33, 135–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milton, J. (2009). Second language acquisition: Measuring second language vocabulary acquisition. Toronto: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R., & Myles, F. (1998). Second language theories. London: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naigles, L. R., Eisenberg, A. R., Kako, E. T., Highter, M., & McGraw, N. (1998). Speaking of motion: Verb use in English and Spanish. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13(5), 521–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Navarro, S., & Nicoladis, E. (2004, July). A cognitive account on the conceptualization of motion in adult English-Spanish bilinguals. Paper presented at the International Conference on Language, Culture and Mind, University of Portsmouth, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Navarro, S., & Nicoladis, E. (2005). Describing motion events in adult L2 Spanish narratives. In D. Eddington (Ed.), Proceedings of the 6th Conference on the Acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese as First and Second Language (pp. 102–107). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Negueruela, E., Lantolf, J., Jordan, S., & Gelabert, J. (2004). The “private function” of gesture in second language speaking activity: A study of motion verbs and gesturing in English and Spanish. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(1), 113–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicoladis, E. (2002). Some gestures develop in conjunction with spoken language development and others don’t: Evidence from bilingual preschoolers. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 26, 241–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicoladis, E. (2007). The effect of bilingualism on the use of manual gestures. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 441–454. doi:10.1017/S0142716407070245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ninio, A. (1999). Pathbreaking verbs in syntactic development and the question of prototypical transitivity. Journal of Child Language, 26, 619–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Özçalişkan, S., & Slobin, D. I. (1999). Learning how to search for the frog: Expression of manner of motion in English, Spanish, and Turkish. In A. Greenhill, H. Littlefield, & C. Tano (Eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (Vol. 2, pp. 541–552). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perez-Leroux, A., & Glass, W. (1997). OPC effects in the L2 acquisition of Spanish. In A. T. Perez-Leroux & W. Glass (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives on the acquisition of Spanish. Volume 1: Developing grammars (pp. 149–165). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pika, S., Nicoladis, E., & Marentette, P. F. (2006). A cross-cultural study on the use of gestures: Evidence for cross-linguistic transfer? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 9, 319–327. doi:10.1017/S1366728906002665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posner, M., & Klein, R. (1973). On the function of consciousness. In S. Kornblum (Ed.), Attention and performance IV (pp. 21–35). London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postman, L. (1971). Transfer, interference and forgetting. In J. W. Kling & L. A. Riggs (Eds.), Woodworth and Schlosberg’s experimental psychology (pp. 1019–1132). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, N., Jansma, J., Jager, G., Van Raalten, T., & Kahn, R. (2004). Neurophysiological factors in human information processing capacity. Brain, 127, 517–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, S. (1999). Patterns of acquisition in the emerging mental lexicon: The case of to and for in English. Brain and Language, 68, 268–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, P. (1996). Learning simple and complex second language rules under implicit, incidental, rule-search, and instructed conditions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 27–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, P. (2001). Task complexity, cognitive resources, and syllabus design: A triadic framework for investigating task influences on SLA. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 287–318). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, P. (2005). Cognitive complexity and task sequencing: A review of studies in a componential framework for second language task design. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 43, 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, P. (2007). Task complexity, cognitive resources, and syllabus design: A triadic framework for examining task influences on SLA. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 287–318). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, P., Cadierno, T., & Shirai, Y. (2009). Time and motion: Measuring the effects of the conceptual demands of tasks on second language speech production. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 533–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, P., & Gilabert, R. (2007). Task complexity, the Cognition Hypothesis and second language learning and performance. In P. Robinson & R. Gilabert (Eds.), Task complexity, the cognition hypothesis and second language instruction [Special Issue]. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 45(3), 161–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sato, C. (1986). Conversation and interlanguage development: Rethinking the connection. In R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 134–151). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, R. (1993). Awareness and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 206–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, R. (1994a). Deconstructing consciousness in search of useful definitions for applied linguistics. AILA Review, 11, 11–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, R. (1994b). Implicit learning and the cognitive unconscious: Of artificial grammars and SLA. In N. C. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 165–209). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In R. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, R., & Frota, S. (1986). Developing basic conversational ability in a second language: A case study of an adult learner of Portuguese. In R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 237–326). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slobin, D. I. (1985). Crosslinguistic evidence for the language-making capacity. In D. I. Slobin (Ed.), A crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, Vol. 2: Theoretical issues (pp. 1157–1256). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slobin, D. I. (1987). Thinking for speaking. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, USA (pp. 435–445).

    Google Scholar 

  • Slobin, D. I. (1991). Learning to think for speaking: Native language, cognition, and rhetorical style. Pragmatics, 1, 7–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slobin, D. I. (1996). Two ways to travel: Verbs of motion in English and Spanish. In M. Shibatani & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Grammatical constructions: Their form and meaning (pp. 195–220). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slobin, D. I. (2003). Language and thought online: Cognitive consequences of linguistic relativity. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought (pp. 157–192). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slobin, D. I. (2004). The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic Typology and the expression of motion events. In S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives (p. 219). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slobin, D. I., & Hoiting, N. (1994). Reference to movement in spoken and signed language: Typological considerations. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 20, 487–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stam, G. (2010). Can an L2 speaker’s patterns of thinking for speaking change? In Z. Han & T. Cadierno (Eds.), Linguistic relativity (pp. 59–83). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talmy, L. (1985). Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shoepen (Ed.), Language typology and lexical description: Vol. 3. Grammatical categories and the lexicon (pp. 36–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talmy, L. (1991). Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 17, 480–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics: Vol. II: Typology and process in concept structuring. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarone, E. (1982). Systematicity and attention in interlanguage. Language Learning, 32(1), 69–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Patten, B. (1989). Can learners attend to form and content while processing input? Hispania, 72, 409–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Patten, B. (1990). Attending to form and content in the input. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 287–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Patten, B. (1996). Processing instruction. InInput processing and grammar instruction: Theory and research (pp. 55–86). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, T. (2006). Animation from pencils to pixels: Classical techniques for digital animators. Burlington, MA: Focal Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. N. (2004). Implicit learning of form-meaning connections. In B. VanPatten, J. Williams, S. Rott, & M. Overstreet (Eds.), Form-meaning connections in second language acquisition (pp. 203–218). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

    Samuel A. Navarro Ortega

Authors
  1. Samuel A. Navarro Ortega
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ortega, S.A.N. (2017). Sensitivity to the Path Conflation in Oral L2 Spanish. In: Comprehending and Speaking about Motion in L2 Spanish. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49307-7_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49307-7_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-49306-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-49307-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation