Skip to main content

Temporal Analysis of Comparative Opinion Mining

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Digital Libraries: Knowledge, Information, and Data in an Open Access Society (ICADL 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 10075))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Social media have become a popular platform for people to share their opinions and emotions. Analyzing opinions that are posted on the web is very important since they influence future decisions of organizations and people. Comparative opinion mining is a subfield of opinion mining that deals with identifying and extracting information that is expressed in a comparative form. Due to the fact that there is a huge amount of opinions posted online everyday, analyzing comparative opinions from a temporal perspective is an important application that needs to be explored. This study introduces the idea of integrating temporal elements in comparative opinion mining. Different type of results can be obtained from the temporal analysis, including trend analysis, competitive analysis as well as burst detection. In our study we show that temporal analysis of comparative opinion mining provides more current and relevant information to users compared to standard opinion mining.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See: http://www.epinions.com/.

References

  1. Adams, A., Blandford, A.: Digital libraries’ support for the user’s information journey. In: Proceedings of the JCDL2005, pp. 160–169. ACM (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aggarwal, C.C., Zhai, C. (eds.): Mining Text Data. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alves, A.L.F., Baptista, C.S., Firmino, A.A., Oliveira, M.G., Figueirêdo, H.F.: Temporal analysis of sentiment in tweets: a case study with FIFA confederations cup in Brazil. In: Decker, H., Lhotská, L., Link, S., Spies, M., Wagner, R.R. (eds.) DEXA 2014. LNCS, vol. 8644, pp. 81–88. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10073-9_7

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bjørkelund, E., Burnett, T.H.: Temporal Opinion Mining. Master’s thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Branavan, S., Chen, H., Eisenstein, J., Barzilay, R.: Learning document-level semantic properties from free-text annotations. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 34, 569–603 (2009)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Cheng, Z., Caverlee, J., Lee, K., Sui, D.Z.: Exploring millions of footprints in location sharing services. In: Proceedings of the ICWSM 2011, vol. 2011, pp. 81–88. AAAI Press (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. DiGrazia, J., McKelvey, K., Bollen, J., Rojas, F.: More tweets, more votes: social media as a quantitative indicator of political behavior. PLoS ONE 8(11), e79449 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Figueirêdo, H.F., Lacerda, Y.A., Paiva, A.C., Casanova, M.A., de Souza Baptista, C.: PhotoGeo: a photo digital library with spatial-temporal support and self-annotation. Multimed. Tools Appl. 59(1), 279–305 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fujimoto, K.: Investigation of potency-magnitude relations of eWOM messages with a focus on intensified comparative expressions. In: Proceedings of the ICCI*CC 2012, pp. 163–173. IEEE (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gu, Y.H., Yoo, S.J.: Searching a best product based on mining comparison sentences. In: Proceedings of the SCIS & ISIS 2010, vol. 2010, pp. 929–933. Japan Society for Fuzzy Theory and Intelligent Informatics (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. He, S., Yuan, F., Wang, Y.: Extracting the comparative relations for mobile reviews. In: Proceedings of the CECNet 2012, pp. 3247–3250. IEEE (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. He, W., Zha, S., Li, L.: Social media competitive analysis and text mining: a case study in the pizza industry. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 33(3), 464–472 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jindal, N., Liu, B.: Identifying comparative sentences in text documents. In: Proceedings of the SIGIR 2006, pp. 244–251. ACM (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jindal, N., Liu, B.: Mining comparative sentences and relations. In: Proceedings of the AAAI 2006. pp. 1331–1336. AAAI Press (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jurgens, D., Lu, T.C.: Temporal motifs reveal the dynamics of editor interactions in wikipedia. In: Proceedings of the ICWSM 2012, pp. 162–169. AAAI Press (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Keikha, M., Gerani, S., Crestani, F.: Time-based relevance models. In: Proceedings of the SIGIR 2011, pp. 1087–1088. ACM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kessler, W., Kuhn, J.: Detection of product comparisons-how far does an out-of-the-box semantic role labeling system take you? In: Proceedings of the EMNLP 2013, pp. 1892–1897. ACL (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kessler, W., Kuhn, J.: A corpus of comparisons in product reviews. In: Proceedings of the LREC 2014, pp. 2242–2248. European Language Resources Association (ELRA) (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kurashima, T., Bessho, K., Toda, H., Uchiyama, T., Kataoka, R.: Ranking entities using comparative relations. In: Bhowmick, S.S., Küng, J., Wagner, R. (eds.) DEXA 2008. LNCS, vol. 5181, pp. 124–133. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-85654-2_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu, B.: Sentiment analysis and opinion mining. Synth. Lect. Hum. Lang. Technol. 5(1), 1–167 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu, C., Xu, R., Liu, J., Qu, P., Wang, H., Zou, C.: Comparative opinion sentences identification and elements extraction. In: Proceedings of the ICMLC 2013, vol. 4, pp. 1886–1891. IEEE (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Maynard, D., Gossen, G., Funk, A., Fisichella, M.: Should i care about your opinion? Detection of opinion interestingness and dynamics in social media. Future Internet 6(3), 457–481 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mehmood, A., Palli, A.S., Khan, M.: A study of sentiment and trend analysis techniques for social media content. Int. J. Modern Educ. Comput. Sci. (IJMECS) 6(12), 47 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. O’Connor, B., Balasubramanyan, R., Routledge, B.R., Smith, N.A.: From tweets to polls: linking text sentiment to public opinion time series. In: Proceedings of the ICWSM 2010, no. 122–129. AAAI Press (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Romero, D.M., Galuba, W., Asur, S., Huberman, B.A.: Influence and passivity in social media. In: Gunopulos, D., Hofmann, T., Malerba, D., Vazirgiannis, M. (eds.) ECML PKDD 2011. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6913, pp. 18–33. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-23808-6_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Sakaki, T., Okazaki, M., Matsuo, Y.: Tweet analysis for real-time event detection and earthquake reporting system development. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 25(4), 919–931 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sun, J., Long, C., Zhu, X., Huang, M.: Mining reviews for product comparison and recommendation. Polibits 39, 33–40 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tivy, A., Howell, S.E., Alt, B., McCourt, S., Chagnon, R., Crocker, G., Carrieres, T., Yackel, J.J.: Trends and variability in summer sea ice cover in the Canadian arctic based on the Canadian ice service digital archive, 1960–2008 and 1968–2008. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 116(C3) (2011). doi:10.1029/2009JC005855

  29. Tkachenko, M., Lauw, H.W.: Generative modeling of entity comparisons in text. In: Proceedings of the CIKM 2014, pp. 859–868. ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Tremayne, M.: Anatomy of protest in the digital era: a network analysis of twitter and occupy wall street. Soc. Mov. Stud. 13(1), 110–126 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Tu, W., Cheung, D., Mamoulis, N.: Time-sensitive opinion mining for prediction. In: Proceedings of the AAAI 2015. AAAI Press (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Varathan, K.D., Giachanou, A., Crestani, F.: Comparative opinion mining: a review. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. (2016, in press)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wang, G., Xie, S., Liu, B., Yu, P.S.: Identify online store review spammers via social review graph. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. 3(4), 61:1–61:21 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wang, W., Zhao, T., Xin, G., Xu, Y.: Exploiting machine learning for comparative sentences extraction. Int. J. Hybrid Inf. Technol. 8(3), 347–354 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Xu, K., Liao, S.S., Li, J., Song, Y.: Mining comparative opinions from customer reviews for competitive intelligence. Decis. Support Syst. 50(4), 743–754 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhou, X., Tao, X., Yong, J., Yang, Z.: Sentiment analysis on tweets for social events. In: Proceedings of the CSCWD 2013, pp. 557–562. IEEE (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was partially funded by Swiss Secretariat of Education, Research and Innovation (SERI).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kasturi Dewi Varathan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Varathan, K.D., Giachanou, A., Crestani, F. (2016). Temporal Analysis of Comparative Opinion Mining. In: Morishima, A., Rauber, A., Liew, C. (eds) Digital Libraries: Knowledge, Information, and Data in an Open Access Society. ICADL 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10075. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49304-6_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49304-6_36

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-49303-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-49304-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics