Abstract
This paper details how a university library evaluated its institutional repository using a user experience design (UXD) methodology and redesigned it based on the findings. The online repository, running on DSpace, was not being utilized as expected by academics and researchers, so a detailed user evaluation and usability study was undertaken to find out the reasons why. Findings showed lack of usability and a mismatch between user expectations and system architecture. Hence, significant improvements were made to the user interface, and in communicating the status of items held in the repository (open or closed access). The authors assess the impact of these changes and argue that better usability results in greater visibility of the open-access repository, and hence, greater visibility for the university’s researchers. Other challenges regarding the adoption of open access by academics and researchers at the university are also discussed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Jantz, R.C., Wilson, M.C.: Institutional repositories: faculty deposits, marketing, and the reform of scholarly communication. J. Acad. Librariansh. 34, 186–195 (2008)
Betz, S., Hall, R.: Self-archiving with ease in an institutional repository: microinteractions and the user experience. Inf. Technol. Libr. 34, 43–58 (2015)
Kim, J.: Motivations of faculty self-archiving in institutional repositories. J. Acad. Librariansh. 37, 246–254 (2011)
Bell, S., Foster, N.F., Gibbons, S.: Reference librarians and the success of institutional repositories. Ref. Serv. Rev. 33, 283–290 (2005)
MacMillan, D.: Data sharing and discovery: what librarians need to know. J. Acad. Librariansh. 40, 541–549 (2014)
Armstrong, M.: Institutional repository management models that support faculty research dissemination. OCLC Syst. Serv. 30, 43–51 (2014)
Körber, N., Suleman, H.: Usability of digital repository software: a study of DSpace installation and configuration. In: Buchanan, G., Masoodian, M., Cunningham, S.J. (eds.) ICADL 2008. LNCS, vol. 5362, pp. 31–40. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-89533-6_4
Van House, N.A., Butler, M.H., Ogle, V., Schiff, L.: User-centered iterative design for digital libraries: The cypress experience (1996). http://dlib.org/dlib/february96/02vanhouse.html
McKay, D.: Institutional repositories and their “other” users: usability beyond authors. Ariadne, 1–9 (2007)
Aljohani, M., Blustein, J.: Personas help understand users’ needs, goals and desires in an online institutional repository. Int. J. Comput. Electr. Autom. Contr. Inf. Eng. 9, 629–636 (2015)
Koshiyama, D., Pinho, A.L.S., Santa Rosa, J.G.: Analysis of usability and information architecture of the UFRN institutional repository. In: Marcus, A. (ed.) DUXU 2015. LNCS, vol. 9188, pp. 197–207. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-20889-3_19
Law, EL.-C., Roto, V., Hassenzahl, M., Vermeeren, A., Kort, J.: Understanding, scoping and defining user experience. In: Proceeidngs of 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing System (CHI 2009), p. 719 (2009)
Blandford, A., Buchanan, G.: Usability of digital libraries: a source of creative tensions with technical developments. IEEE Tech. Comm. Digit. Libr. 1, 9 (2003)
Open Access Policy. http://www.gsu.uts.edu.au/policies/open-access.html
Stasko, J., Catrambone, R., Guzdial, M., McDonald, K.: An evaluation of space-filling information visualizations for depicting hierarchical structures. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 53, 663–694 (2000)
Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification (ANZSRC) (2008). http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/0/6BB427AB9696C225CA2574180004463E
Thong, J., Hong, W., Tam, K.-Y.: Understanding user acceptance of digital libraries: what are the roles of interface characteristics, organisational context, and individual differences. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 57, 215–242 (2002)
Kupersmith, J.: Library Terms That Users Understand. UC Berkeley Libr., 1–36 (2012)
Nielsen, J., Molich, R.: Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. In: Proceedings of The SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 249–256. ACM, New York (1990)
Shneiderman, B.: The eyes have it: a task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations. In: Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages, pp. 336–343. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC (1996)
Nielsen, J., Landauer, T.K.: A mathematical model of the finding of usability problems. In: Proceedings of the INTERACT 1993 and CHI 1993 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 206–213. ACM, New York (1993)
Acknowledgments
We thank the UTS Library for their support of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Luca, E., Narayan, B. (2016). Redesigning the Open-Access Institutional Repository: A User Experience Approach. In: Morishima, A., Rauber, A., Liew, C. (eds) Digital Libraries: Knowledge, Information, and Data in an Open Access Society. ICADL 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10075. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49304-6_33
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49304-6_33
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-49303-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-49304-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)