Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

3rd International Symposium of Space Optical Instruments and Applications pp 1–8Cite as

Study of System Effectiveness Evaluation for Optical Imaging Reconnaissance Satellite Based on Fuzzy Theory

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Physics ((SPPHY,volume 192))

Abstract

Evaluation of system effectiveness for optical imaging reconnaissance satellite (OIRS) is a tough issue which is multi-level and multi-factor. According to key parameters of OIRS, a system effectiveness evaluation model for OIRS is proposed in this paper which includes 4 levels and 13 main factors. The OIRS model was verified by using fuzzy comprehensive evaluation (FCE) method and some typical satellites (Geoeye-1, WorldView-1/2/3, Pleiades and Quickbird-2) were used as evaluating cases. The results showed that the OIRS model was effective. This model and FCE method are very useful for development research and planning of optical imaging satellites.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. US Army Material Command, Engineer Design Handbook - Systems Analysis and Cost-effectiveness, Document AMCP 706-191, Washington:, pp. 2–18, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Weapon System Effectiveness. http://uir.unisa.ac.za/bitstream/handle/10500/1527/03Chapter3.pdf.

  3. R. Whitaker. “Criticisms of the Analytic Hierarchy Process: Why they often make no sense,” Mathematical and Computer Modelling, vol. 46, pp. 948–961, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  4. L. Warren, “Uncertainties in the Analytic Hierarchy Process,” http://dspace.dsto.defence.gov.au/dspace/bitstream/1947/3553/1/DSTO-TN-0597%20PR.pdf.

  5. S. Chen. “Evaluating weapon systems using fuzzy arithmetic operations,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 77, pp. 265–276, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. Elhady, “Remote sensing satellite system overall effectiveness analysis and modeling,” IEEE Aerospace Conference, pp. 1–10, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  7. DoD Directive 3100.10, “Space Policy,” pp. 12, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  8. M.T. Trussell1, M.N. Martin, R.M. Ewart, “Resilience architecting and methodology development for the space enterprise,” AIAA SPACE 2015 Conference and Exposition, pp. 1–11, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Beijing Institute of Space Science and Technology Information, Beijing, China

    Liu Tao

Authors
  1. Liu Tao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liu Tao .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Optics Research Group, Delft University of Technology Optics Research Group, CJ Delft, The Netherlands

    H. Paul Urbach

  2. Southeast University , Nanjing, Jiangsu, China

    Guangjun Zhang

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Tao, L. (2017). Study of System Effectiveness Evaluation for Optical Imaging Reconnaissance Satellite Based on Fuzzy Theory. In: Urbach, H., Zhang, G. (eds) 3rd International Symposium of Space Optical Instruments and Applications. Springer Proceedings in Physics, vol 192. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49184-4_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation