Skip to main content

Time During Time: Multi-scalar Temporal Cognition

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cognition Beyond the Brain

Abstract

Most models of cognitive function focus on internal structures while neglecting interactive and multi-scalar temporal elements. The current chapter advances the argument that cognition cannot be defined in isolation of three components: internal mechanisms (e.g. neural connections as well as our bodies), externally distributed interactions (e.g. sampling bias and other people), and multi-scalar temporal elements (e.g. socio-cultural background and habits ). Further, the chapter advances the position that the definition of cognition necessarily is a functional concept. In this view, an objective world exists separate from cognitive functionality (and the individual performing the cognitive task). However, the derived functionality can only ever be an imperfect impression of this world to the extent that it is constructed and emergent as a result of the three aspects. This suggests a performed and multi-scalar temporal emergence of subjective selfhood that may nonetheless be modelled from a formal perspective. Finally, while most evidence in support of the multi-scalar temporal definition of cognition is indicative, the chapter briefly considers Agent-Based Models as a direct way to test plausible models of cognition that incorporates the three elements of cognitive functionality.

The Danish Council of Independent Research supports the research (ID: DFF – 1329-00021B).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    ‘Causal’ refers to aspects that, if removed, would qualitatively change the outcome of a chain. Comparatively, supplementary aspects merely modulate the outcome of a chain. I am grateful to a reviewer who pointed out this terminological insufficiency.

  2. 2.

    As reviewed in section “Indicative evidence for MST cognition”, there is a growing amount of evidence to support this claim.

  3. 3.

    Presumably coordination-induction becomes easier over time with experience, suggesting a temporal relation in coordination aspects as well.

  4. 4.

    Individual differences may account for some of this variance. The weight of culture and individual differences is a fascinating research topic that warrants more exploration.

  5. 5.

    These are two of five general personality traits frequently used in the psychology of personality called OCEAN or ‘the big five’: Openness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Neuroticism (see e.g. Digman 1990; Johnson 2014).

  6. 6.

    Both situational and temporal aspects go beyond the brain in fundamental ways that are not traceable or reducible to neural pathways. For example, emergence of group behaviour may not be reducible to he cognitive functions of the involved individuals, but draw on emergent properties that go beyond each individual. Agent-Based Models may be an ideal too to test the hypothesis that cognitive function in a larger network goes beyond the cognitive capabilities of each individual.

  7. 7.

    Prejudiced violence is a good example of this. Isolated, such actions may appear irrational and unmotivated. MST analyses of such cognitive functions may provide an ontogenesis of hatred that cannot be located in the specific situation in which the hate-crime takes place. This broadens the epistemic field and allows for different causal connections that motivate violence (e.g. the upbringing of the person).

  8. 8.

    Note that internal mechanisms also provide cues that may be overridden. For example, craving ice cream while on a diet. Similarly, one’s cultural background may provide strong cues for certain cognitive effort, which may (or may not) be overridden given reflection or determination.

  9. 9.

    Note, however, that this does not entail total ethical and normative relativism.

  10. 10.

    The weight and influence of individual temporal nodes in such a system would be determined by careful examination of the case study and the data available for that system.

References

  • Blank, S. C., Scott, S. K., Murphy, K., Warburton, E., & Wise, R. J. (2002). Speech production: Wernicke, Broca and beyond, Brain, 125, 1829–1838.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chater, N., & Christiansen, M. H. (2008). Language as shaped by the brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31, 537–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chater, N., & Christiansen, M. H. (2010). Language acquisition meets language evolution. Cognitive Science, 34, 1131–1157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chater, N., & Manning, C. D. (2006). Probabilistic models of language processing an acquisition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(7), 335–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1980). Rules and representations. Oxford, England: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58, 7–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowley, S. J. (2009). Distributed language and dynamics. Pragmatics & Cognition, 17(3), 495–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowley, S. J. (2011). Taking a language stance. Ecological Psychology, 23, 185–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowley, S. J., & Steffensen, S. V. (2015). Coordination in language: Temporality and time-ranging. Interaction Studies, 16(3), 474–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Martino, D., Kumaran, D., Seymour, B., & Dolan, R. J. (2006). Frames, biases, and rational decision-making in the human brain. Science, 313, 684–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: The emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dronkers, N. F. (1996). A new brain region for coordinating speech articulation. Nature, 384, 159–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enfield, N. P. (2014). Causal dynamics of language. In N. J. Enfield, P. Kockelman & J. Sidnell (Eds.), Cambridge handbook for linguistic anthropology. Chapter 13 (pp. 325–343), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, J. M., & Axtell, R. (1996). Growing artificial societies: Social science from the bottom up. Cambridge, Massachussetts: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, J. M. (2013). Agenz_zero: Toward neurocognitive foundations for generative social science. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanon, F. (2001/1963). The wretched of the earth. London, UK: Penguin Modern Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, B., Bruijn, G. J., & Lally, P. (2011). A systematic review and meta-analysis of applications of the self-report habit index to nutrition and physical activity behaviours. Annals of behavioral medicine: A publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, 42(2), 174–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrod, S., & Pickering, M. J. (2004). Why is conversation so easy? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(1), 8–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrod, S., & Pickering, M. J. (2009). Joint action, interactive alignment, and dialog. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(2), 292–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemmingsen, B. H. (2013). The quick and the dead: On temporality and human agency. In S. Cowley & F. Vallée-Tourangeau (Eds.), Cognition beyond the brain: Computation, interactivity and human artifice (pp. 93–112), Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hohwy, J. (2013). The predictive mind. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hood, B. (2012). The self illusion: Why there is no ‘you’ inside your head. London, UK: Constable & Robinson Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornikx, J. (2011). Epistemic authority of professors and researchers: Differential perceptions by students form two cultural-educational systems. Social Psychology of Education, 14, 169–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, A. S., Chater, N., & Vitányi, P. M. (2011). The probabilistic analysis of language acquisition: Theoretical, computational, and experimental analysis. Cognition, 120(3), 380–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. London: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J. A. (2014). Measuring thirty facets of the five factor model with a 120-item public domain inventory: Development of the IPIP-NEO-120. Journal of Research in Personality, 51, 78–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jokela, M., Hakulinen, C., Singh-Manoux, A., & Kivimäki, M. (2014). Personality change associated with chronic diseases: Pooled analysis of four prospective cohort studies. Psychological Medicine, 44(12), 2629–2640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knoblich, G., & Sebanz, N. (2008). Evolving intentions for social interaction: From entrainment to joint action. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London B Biological Sciences, 363, 2021–2031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lykou, E., Rankin, K. P., Chatziantaniou, L., Boulas, C., Papatriantafyllou, O., Tsaousis, I., et al. (2013). big 5 personality changes in Greek bvFTD. AD, and MCI patients, Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders, 27(3), 258–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacWhinney, B. (2005). The emergence of linguistic form in time. Connection Science, 17(3–4), 191–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madsen, J. K. (2016). The malleability and predictability of source credibility: American election candidates as a case study. In D. Mohammed & M. Lewinksy (Eds.), Studies in argumentation and logic (vol. 1, chapter 20, pp. 457–476).

    Google Scholar 

  • Madsen, J. K., & Cowley, S. J. (2014). Living subjectivity: Time-scales, language, and the fluidity of self. Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 21(1/2), 11–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, C. R. M. (2004). Framing effects in inference tasks and why they are normatively defensible. Memory & Cognition, 32, 874–885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, C. R. M., & Nelson, J. D. (2003). What a speaker’s choice of frame reveals: Reference points, frame selection, and framing effects. Psychonomic Bulleting & Review, 10, 596–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, M., & Cowley, S. J. (2013). Human agency and the resources of reason. In S. Cowley & F. Vallée-Tourangeau (Eds.), Cognition beyond the brain: Computation, interactivity and human artifice (pp. 13–30). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, M. (2014). Time scales of socio-cultural dynamics. Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 21(1/2), 66–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, S. B. (2012). Interactivity in health care: Bodies, values and dynamics. Language Sciences, 34(5), 532–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, S., & Steffensen, S. V. (2014). Temporal dynamics in medical visual systems. Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 21(1/2), 143–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pezzulo, G., & Dindo, H. (2011). What should I do next? Using shared representations to solve interaction problems. Experimental Brain Research, 211(3), 613–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2013). An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(4), 329–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pocnet, C., Rossier, J., Antonietti, J.-P., & Gunten, Av. (2011). Personality changes in patients with beginning Alzheimer disease. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 56(7), 408–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proust, M. (2001). In search of lost time (vol. I). London: Everyman’s Library. UK: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rączaszek-Leonardi, J. (2014). Multiple systems and multiple time scales of language dynamics: Coping with complexity. Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 21(1/2), 37–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall, W. L. (2007). From compost to computer: Rethinking our metaphors for memory. Theory Psychology, 17, 611–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rigoli, L. & Spivey, M. J. (2015). Real-time language processing as embodied and embedded in joint action. In R. K. Mishra, N. Srinivasan & F. Huettig (Eds.), Attention and vision in language processing (pp. 3–23). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodd, J. M., Cutrin, B. L., Kirsch, H., Millar, A., & Davis, M. H. (2013). Long-term priming of the meanings of ambiguous words. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(2), 180–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, S. K. (2012). The neurobiology of speech perception and production—Can functional imaging tell us anything we did not already know? Journal of Communication Disorders, 45, 419–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sebanz, N., Bekkering, H., & Knoblich, G. (2006). Joint action: Bodies and minds moving together. Trends in Cognitive Science, 10, 70–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffensen, S. V. (2013). Human interactivity: Problem-solving, solution-probing and verbal patterns in the wild. In: S. Cowley & F. Vallée-Tourangeau (Eds.), Cognition beyond the brain: Computation, interactivity and human artifice (pp. 195–221). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffensen, S. V., & Cowley, S. J. (2010). Signifying bodies and health: A non-local aftermath. In Signifying Bodies: Biosemiosis, Interaction and Health, Catholic University of Portugal, Braga.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffensen, S. V., & Pedersen, S. (2014). Temporal dynamics in human interaction. Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 21(1/2), 80–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, N., Chater, N., & Brown, G. D. A. (2006). Decision by sampling. Cognitive Psychology, 53, 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, N., & Simpson, K. (2008). A decision-by-sampling account of decision under risk. In N. Chater & M. Oaksford (Eds.), The probabilistic mind: Prospects for Bayesian cognitive science (pp. 261–276). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness. London, UK: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thibault, P. J. (2011). First-order languaging dynamics and second-order language: The distributed language view. Ecological Psychology, 23(3), 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, L., & Saunders, S. B. (2002). The socio-cultural embeddedness of individual’s ethical reasoning in organizations (cross-cultural ethics). Journal of Business Ethics, 35(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsui, J., & Windsor, C. (2001). Some cross-cultural evidence on ethical reasoning. Journal of Business Ethics, 31(2), 143–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453–458.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Uryu, M., Steffensen, S. V., & Kramsch, C. (2014). The ecology of intercultural interaction: Timescales, temporal ranges and identity dynamics. Language Sciences, 41, Part A(0), 41–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valleée-Tourangeau, F., & Cowley, S. (2013). Human thinking beyond the brain, in the wild. In S. Cowley & F. Vallée-Tourangeau (Eds.), Cognition beyond the brain: Computation, interactivity and human artifice (pp. 1–14), Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallée-Tourangeau, F., & Villejoubert, G. (2013). Naturalising problem solving, in the wild. In S. Cowley & F. Vallée-Tourangeau (Eds.), Cognition beyond the brain: Computation, interactivity and human artifice (pp. 241–253), Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vlaev, I., Seymour, B., Dolan, R. J., & Chater, N. (2009). The price of pain and the value of suffering. Psychological Science, 20(3), 309–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wahlin & Byrne. (2011). Personality changes in Alzheimer’s disease: A systematic review. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 26(10), 1019–1029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wearing, D. (2005). Forever Today, Corgi

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise, R. J. S., Greene, J., Büchel, C., & Scott, S. K. (1999). Brain systems for word perception and articulation, The Lancet, 353, 1057–1061.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yama, H., Manktelow, K. I., Mercier, H., Henst, J-Bvd, Do, K. S., Kawasaki, Y., et al. (2010). A cross-cultural study of hindsight bias and conditional probabilistic reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning, 16(4), 346–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, B., Galbraith, N., Yama, H., Wang, L., & Manktelow, K. I. (2015). Dialectical thinking: A cross-cultural study of Japanese, and British students. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 27(6), 771–779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jens Koed Madsen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Madsen, J.K. (2017). Time During Time: Multi-scalar Temporal Cognition. In: Cowley, S., Vallée-Tourangeau, F. (eds) Cognition Beyond the Brain. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49115-8_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49115-8_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-49114-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-49115-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics