Abstract
Most models of cognitive function focus on internal structures while neglecting interactive and multi-scalar temporal elements. The current chapter advances the argument that cognition cannot be defined in isolation of three components: internal mechanisms (e.g. neural connections as well as our bodies), externally distributed interactions (e.g. sampling bias and other people), and multi-scalar temporal elements (e.g. socio-cultural background and habits ). Further, the chapter advances the position that the definition of cognition necessarily is a functional concept. In this view, an objective world exists separate from cognitive functionality (and the individual performing the cognitive task). However, the derived functionality can only ever be an imperfect impression of this world to the extent that it is constructed and emergent as a result of the three aspects. This suggests a performed and multi-scalar temporal emergence of subjective selfhood that may nonetheless be modelled from a formal perspective. Finally, while most evidence in support of the multi-scalar temporal definition of cognition is indicative, the chapter briefly considers Agent-Based Models as a direct way to test plausible models of cognition that incorporates the three elements of cognitive functionality.
The Danish Council of Independent Research supports the research (ID: DFF – 1329-00021B).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
‘Causal’ refers to aspects that, if removed, would qualitatively change the outcome of a chain. Comparatively, supplementary aspects merely modulate the outcome of a chain. I am grateful to a reviewer who pointed out this terminological insufficiency.
- 2.
As reviewed in section “Indicative evidence for MST cognition”, there is a growing amount of evidence to support this claim.
- 3.
Presumably coordination-induction becomes easier over time with experience, suggesting a temporal relation in coordination aspects as well.
- 4.
Individual differences may account for some of this variance. The weight of culture and individual differences is a fascinating research topic that warrants more exploration.
- 5.
- 6.
Both situational and temporal aspects go beyond the brain in fundamental ways that are not traceable or reducible to neural pathways. For example, emergence of group behaviour may not be reducible to he cognitive functions of the involved individuals, but draw on emergent properties that go beyond each individual. Agent-Based Models may be an ideal too to test the hypothesis that cognitive function in a larger network goes beyond the cognitive capabilities of each individual.
- 7.
Prejudiced violence is a good example of this. Isolated, such actions may appear irrational and unmotivated. MST analyses of such cognitive functions may provide an ontogenesis of hatred that cannot be located in the specific situation in which the hate-crime takes place. This broadens the epistemic field and allows for different causal connections that motivate violence (e.g. the upbringing of the person).
- 8.
Note that internal mechanisms also provide cues that may be overridden. For example, craving ice cream while on a diet. Similarly, one’s cultural background may provide strong cues for certain cognitive effort, which may (or may not) be overridden given reflection or determination.
- 9.
Note, however, that this does not entail total ethical and normative relativism.
- 10.
The weight and influence of individual temporal nodes in such a system would be determined by careful examination of the case study and the data available for that system.
References
Blank, S. C., Scott, S. K., Murphy, K., Warburton, E., & Wise, R. J. (2002). Speech production: Wernicke, Broca and beyond, Brain, 125, 1829–1838.
Chater, N., & Christiansen, M. H. (2008). Language as shaped by the brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31, 537–558.
Chater, N., & Christiansen, M. H. (2010). Language acquisition meets language evolution. Cognitive Science, 34, 1131–1157.
Chater, N., & Manning, C. D. (2006). Probabilistic models of language processing an acquisition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(7), 335–344.
Chomsky, N. (1980). Rules and representations. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58, 7–19.
Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge University Press.
Cowley, S. J. (2009). Distributed language and dynamics. Pragmatics & Cognition, 17(3), 495–507.
Cowley, S. J. (2011). Taking a language stance. Ecological Psychology, 23, 185–209.
Cowley, S. J., & Steffensen, S. V. (2015). Coordination in language: Temporality and time-ranging. Interaction Studies, 16(3), 474–494.
De Martino, D., Kumaran, D., Seymour, B., & Dolan, R. J. (2006). Frames, biases, and rational decision-making in the human brain. Science, 313, 684–687.
Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: The emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417–440.
Dronkers, N. F. (1996). A new brain region for coordinating speech articulation. Nature, 384, 159–161.
Enfield, N. P. (2014). Causal dynamics of language. In N. J. Enfield, P. Kockelman & J. Sidnell (Eds.), Cambridge handbook for linguistic anthropology. Chapter 13 (pp. 325–343), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Epstein, J. M., & Axtell, R. (1996). Growing artificial societies: Social science from the bottom up. Cambridge, Massachussetts: MIT Press.
Epstein, J. M. (2013). Agenz_zero: Toward neurocognitive foundations for generative social science. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Fanon, F. (2001/1963). The wretched of the earth. London, UK: Penguin Modern Classics.
Gardner, B., Bruijn, G. J., & Lally, P. (2011). A systematic review and meta-analysis of applications of the self-report habit index to nutrition and physical activity behaviours. Annals of behavioral medicine: A publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, 42(2), 174–187.
Garrod, S., & Pickering, M. J. (2004). Why is conversation so easy? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(1), 8–11.
Garrod, S., & Pickering, M. J. (2009). Joint action, interactive alignment, and dialog. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(2), 292–304.
Hemmingsen, B. H. (2013). The quick and the dead: On temporality and human agency. In S. Cowley & F. Vallée-Tourangeau (Eds.), Cognition beyond the brain: Computation, interactivity and human artifice (pp. 93–112), Springer.
Hohwy, J. (2013). The predictive mind. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Hood, B. (2012). The self illusion: Why there is no ‘you’ inside your head. London, UK: Constable & Robinson Ltd.
Hornikx, J. (2011). Epistemic authority of professors and researchers: Differential perceptions by students form two cultural-educational systems. Social Psychology of Education, 14, 169–183.
Hsu, A. S., Chater, N., & Vitányi, P. M. (2011). The probabilistic analysis of language acquisition: Theoretical, computational, and experimental analysis. Cognition, 120(3), 380–390.
Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. London: The MIT Press.
Johnson, J. A. (2014). Measuring thirty facets of the five factor model with a 120-item public domain inventory: Development of the IPIP-NEO-120. Journal of Research in Personality, 51, 78–89.
Jokela, M., Hakulinen, C., Singh-Manoux, A., & Kivimäki, M. (2014). Personality change associated with chronic diseases: Pooled analysis of four prospective cohort studies. Psychological Medicine, 44(12), 2629–2640.
Knoblich, G., & Sebanz, N. (2008). Evolving intentions for social interaction: From entrainment to joint action. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London B Biological Sciences, 363, 2021–2031.
Lykou, E., Rankin, K. P., Chatziantaniou, L., Boulas, C., Papatriantafyllou, O., Tsaousis, I., et al. (2013). big 5 personality changes in Greek bvFTD. AD, and MCI patients, Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders, 27(3), 258–264.
MacWhinney, B. (2005). The emergence of linguistic form in time. Connection Science, 17(3–4), 191–211.
Madsen, J. K. (2016). The malleability and predictability of source credibility: American election candidates as a case study. In D. Mohammed & M. Lewinksy (Eds.), Studies in argumentation and logic (vol. 1, chapter 20, pp. 457–476).
Madsen, J. K., & Cowley, S. J. (2014). Living subjectivity: Time-scales, language, and the fluidity of self. Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 21(1/2), 11–22.
McKenzie, C. R. M. (2004). Framing effects in inference tasks and why they are normatively defensible. Memory & Cognition, 32, 874–885.
McKenzie, C. R. M., & Nelson, J. D. (2003). What a speaker’s choice of frame reveals: Reference points, frame selection, and framing effects. Psychonomic Bulleting & Review, 10, 596–602.
Neumann, M., & Cowley, S. J. (2013). Human agency and the resources of reason. In S. Cowley & F. Vallée-Tourangeau (Eds.), Cognition beyond the brain: Computation, interactivity and human artifice (pp. 13–30). Dordrecht: Springer.
Neumann, M. (2014). Time scales of socio-cultural dynamics. Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 21(1/2), 66–79.
Pedersen, S. B. (2012). Interactivity in health care: Bodies, values and dynamics. Language Sciences, 34(5), 532–542.
Pedersen, S., & Steffensen, S. V. (2014). Temporal dynamics in medical visual systems. Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 21(1/2), 143–157.
Pezzulo, G., & Dindo, H. (2011). What should I do next? Using shared representations to solve interaction problems. Experimental Brain Research, 211(3), 613–630.
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2013). An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(4), 329–347.
Pocnet, C., Rossier, J., Antonietti, J.-P., & Gunten, Av. (2011). Personality changes in patients with beginning Alzheimer disease. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 56(7), 408–417.
Proust, M. (2001). In search of lost time (vol. I). London: Everyman’s Library. UK: Random House.
Rączaszek-Leonardi, J. (2014). Multiple systems and multiple time scales of language dynamics: Coping with complexity. Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 21(1/2), 37–52.
Randall, W. L. (2007). From compost to computer: Rethinking our metaphors for memory. Theory Psychology, 17, 611–633.
Rigoli, L. & Spivey, M. J. (2015). Real-time language processing as embodied and embedded in joint action. In R. K. Mishra, N. Srinivasan & F. Huettig (Eds.), Attention and vision in language processing (pp. 3–23). Springer.
Rodd, J. M., Cutrin, B. L., Kirsch, H., Millar, A., & Davis, M. H. (2013). Long-term priming of the meanings of ambiguous words. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(2), 180–198.
Scott, S. K. (2012). The neurobiology of speech perception and production—Can functional imaging tell us anything we did not already know? Journal of Communication Disorders, 45, 419–425.
Sebanz, N., Bekkering, H., & Knoblich, G. (2006). Joint action: Bodies and minds moving together. Trends in Cognitive Science, 10, 70–76.
Steffensen, S. V. (2013). Human interactivity: Problem-solving, solution-probing and verbal patterns in the wild. In: S. Cowley & F. Vallée-Tourangeau (Eds.), Cognition beyond the brain: Computation, interactivity and human artifice (pp. 195–221). Springer.
Steffensen, S. V., & Cowley, S. J. (2010). Signifying bodies and health: A non-local aftermath. In Signifying Bodies: Biosemiosis, Interaction and Health, Catholic University of Portugal, Braga.
Steffensen, S. V., & Pedersen, S. (2014). Temporal dynamics in human interaction. Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 21(1/2), 80–97.
Stewart, N., Chater, N., & Brown, G. D. A. (2006). Decision by sampling. Cognitive Psychology, 53, 1–26.
Stewart, N., & Simpson, K. (2008). A decision-by-sampling account of decision under risk. In N. Chater & M. Oaksford (Eds.), The probabilistic mind: Prospects for Bayesian cognitive science (pp. 261–276). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness. London, UK: Penguin Books.
Thibault, P. J. (2011). First-order languaging dynamics and second-order language: The distributed language view. Ecological Psychology, 23(3), 1–36.
Thorne, L., & Saunders, S. B. (2002). The socio-cultural embeddedness of individual’s ethical reasoning in organizations (cross-cultural ethics). Journal of Business Ethics, 35(1), 1–14.
Tsui, J., & Windsor, C. (2001). Some cross-cultural evidence on ethical reasoning. Journal of Business Ethics, 31(2), 143–150.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453–458.
Uryu, M., Steffensen, S. V., & Kramsch, C. (2014). The ecology of intercultural interaction: Timescales, temporal ranges and identity dynamics. Language Sciences, 41, Part A(0), 41–59.
Valleée-Tourangeau, F., & Cowley, S. (2013). Human thinking beyond the brain, in the wild. In S. Cowley & F. Vallée-Tourangeau (Eds.), Cognition beyond the brain: Computation, interactivity and human artifice (pp. 1–14), Springer.
Vallée-Tourangeau, F., & Villejoubert, G. (2013). Naturalising problem solving, in the wild. In S. Cowley & F. Vallée-Tourangeau (Eds.), Cognition beyond the brain: Computation, interactivity and human artifice (pp. 241–253), Springer.
Vlaev, I., Seymour, B., Dolan, R. J., & Chater, N. (2009). The price of pain and the value of suffering. Psychological Science, 20(3), 309–317.
Wahlin & Byrne. (2011). Personality changes in Alzheimer’s disease: A systematic review. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 26(10), 1019–1029.
Wearing, D. (2005). Forever Today, Corgi
Wise, R. J. S., Greene, J., Büchel, C., & Scott, S. K. (1999). Brain systems for word perception and articulation, The Lancet, 353, 1057–1061.
Yama, H., Manktelow, K. I., Mercier, H., Henst, J-Bvd, Do, K. S., Kawasaki, Y., et al. (2010). A cross-cultural study of hindsight bias and conditional probabilistic reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning, 16(4), 346–371.
Zhang, B., Galbraith, N., Yama, H., Wang, L., & Manktelow, K. I. (2015). Dialectical thinking: A cross-cultural study of Japanese, and British students. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 27(6), 771–779.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Madsen, J.K. (2017). Time During Time: Multi-scalar Temporal Cognition. In: Cowley, S., Vallée-Tourangeau, F. (eds) Cognition Beyond the Brain. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49115-8_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49115-8_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-49114-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-49115-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)