Skip to main content

Living as Languaging: Distributed Knowledge in Living Beings

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

We trace life at different levels of organization and/or description: from protein ecosystems in the cell up to the cohabitation of individuals within and between historically established lineages . Ways of such cohabitation depend on experience of particular guilds or aggregates ; they cannot be easily foretold from any basic level of description, they are distributed across all levels, and across all members of the community . Such phenomena of interactivity constitute a lived world which, we argue, represents a genuine analogy with domains of human cultures and languages. We draw an analogy with three levels of meaning as defined by Rappaport (2010) and make an attempt to show that life and languaging are virtually analogous. Contributions to this volume show that cognition arises not only ‘in the head’, but also as the result of living in a network of interactions—in the medium of languaging ; language and languages cannot be separated from languaging, and our joint activities make sense because of how we concert our doings in a culture or what Thibault (2011) terms a social meshwork . Outcomes of such doings often depend also on differences that people find as meaningful cues to perform expertly or to construe wordings in a particular way. In other words, much depends on patterns that are extracted by living beings that dwell in a historical world of bodily experience , and of the community into which they are rooted. Indeed, in the context, these ideas will not seem controversial; however, in what follows, we propose taking a further step: we propose that analogical processes help all inhabitants of the biosphere /semiosphere to become valuable members such of living networks . Our approach may look as yet another contribution to the long list of holistic theories that compete without success with the reigning reductionist paradigm of biology. We, however, do not deny the explanatory power of contemporary biological theory: by stressing the role of historical bodily experience and of the “cultural” role of communities we strive towards a fuller understanding of life phenomena, much along the line the linguists undertook from the vocabularies through semiotics up to languaging . We invite the reader to take an excursion from the “central dogma ” and neodarwinian explanation of evolution , towards what we believe is a more complete view of the living, that extends through 9 orders of magnitudes (or “73 octaves of nature‘s music”, as poetically expressed by Ho (1993)) and from nanoseconds to 4 billions of years. Our extension to the distributed view is to argue that what goes for cognition and language also applies generally to life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Such processes are especially important in the context of multicellular organisms and their ontogeny. It is important that some of them may outlive even to the next generation, thus transferring the experience of parents.

  2. 2.

    Versions of written US and UK written English may differ in the spelling in 2% of strings. Does this explain the differences between two nations? Remarkably, this line of thinking is pursued by those who seek a genetic Word (in DNA) that is “responsible” for differences in the appearance of the living being (phenotype).

  3. 3.

    In European history, a single “mutation”—insertion of word filioque into the Christian creed (and Son) in the 6th century—is often seen as the main “cause” of schism between Orthodox and Western Christianity.

References

  • Alberts, B., Johnson, A., Lewis, J., Raff, M., Roberts, K., & Walter, P. (2007). Molecular biology of the cell. New York: Garland Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allis, C. D., Jenuwein, T., & Reinberg, D. (2009). Epigenetics. Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anfinsen, C. B. (1973). Principles that govern the folding of protein chains. The Nobel lecture. Science, 181, 223–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbieri, M. (2008a). Life is semiosis: The biosemiotic view of nature. Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, 4, 29–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbieri, M. (2008b). The code model of semiosis: The first steps toward a scientific biosemiotics. The American Journal of Semiotics, 24, 23–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergman, A., & Siegal, M. L. (2003). Evolutionary capacitance as a general feature of complex gene networks. Nature, 424, 549–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General system theory: Foundations, development, applications. New York: George Braziller.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, S. B. (2005). Endless forms most improbable. The new science of evo devo and the making of the animal kingdom. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowley, S. J., & Vallée-Tourangeau, F. (2010). Thinking in action. AI & SOCIETY, 25, 469–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, E. H. (2006). Genomic regulatory systems. Development and evolution. San Diego CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. (1982). The extended phenotype. London: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, A. E. (2010). The symbiotic habit. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eco, U. (1994). The limits of interpretation. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gehring, W. (1999). Master control genes in development and evolution: The homeobox story. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, S. F., & Epel, D. (2009). Ecological developmental biology: Integrating epigenetics, medicine, and evolution. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Good, M. C., Zalatan, J. G., & Lim, W. A. (2011). Scaffold proteins: Hubs for controlling the flow of cellular information. Science, 332, 680–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B. K., Pearson, R. D., & Müller, G. (Eds.). (2004). Environment, development and evolution. Toward a synthesis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1959/1982). The nature of language. In On the way to language (pp. 57–108). San Francisco CA: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1995). The fundamental concepts of metaphysics. World, finitude, solitude. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, M.-W. (1993). Rainbow and the worm. Singapore: World Scientific.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmeister, M., & Martin, W. (2003). Interspecific evolution: Microbial symbiosis, endosymbiosis and gene transfer. Environmental Microbiology, 5, 641–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstadter, D. R. (1979). Gödel, Escher, Bach: An eternal golden braid. New York: Basic Books.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, S. A. (2000). Investigations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirsh, D. (2010). Thinking with external representations. AI & SOCIETY, 25, 441–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleisner, K., & Markoš, A. (2005). Semetic rings: Towards the new concept of mimetic resemblances. Theory in Biosciences, 123, 209–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleisner, K., & Markoš, A. (2009). Mutual understanding and misunderstanding in biological organisms mediated by self-representational meaning of organisms. Sign Systems Studies, 31, 299–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linell, P. (2005). The written language bias in linguistics. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Love, N. (2004). Cognition and the language myth. Language Sciences, 26, 525–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margulis, L., & Sagan, D. (2002). Acquiring genomes: A theory of the origins of species. New York: Basic books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margulis, L., & Fester, R. (Eds.). (1991). Symbiosis as a source of evolutionary innovation. speciation and morphogenesis. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margulis, L. (1993). Symbiosis in cell evolution. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markoš, A., & Faltýnek, D. (2011). Language metaphors of life. Biosemiotics, 4, 171–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markoš, A., & Švorcová, J. (2009). Recorded versus organic memory. Biosemiotics, 2, 131–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markoš, A. (2002). Readers of the book of life. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markoš, A., Grygar, F., Hajnal, L., Kleisner, K., Kratochvíl, Z., & Neubauer, Z. (2009). Life as its own designer: Darwin’s origin and western thought. Dodrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marks, J. (2002). What it means to be 98% chimpanzee: Apes, people, and their genes. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsuda, R. (1987). Animal evolution in changing environment with special reference to abnormal metamorphosis. New York: Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monod, J. (1972). Chance and necessity. Glasgow: W. Collins Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overmann, J. (Ed.). (2006). Molecular basis of symbiosis. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paracer, S., & Ahmadjian, V. (2000). Symbiosis. An introduction to biological associations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poe, M. T. (2011). A history of communications: Media and society from the evolution of speech to the internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, R. A. (2010). Ritual and religion in the making of humanity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redecker, D., Kodner, R., & Graham, L. E. (2000). Glomalean fungi from the Ordovician. Science, 289, 1920–1921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford, S. L., & Lindquist, S. (1998). Hsp90 as a capacitor for morphological evolution. Nature, 3(96), 336–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sapp, J. (1994). Evolution by association: A history of symbiosis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapp, J. (2003). Genesis: The evolution of biology. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Searls, D. B. (2002). The language of genes. Nature, 420, 211–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, M. A. (1971). The matter of life: Philosophical problems of biology. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Švorcová, J. (2012). The phylotypic stage as a boundary of modular memory: Non mechanistic perspective. Theory in Biosciences, 131, 31–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taipale, M., Jarosz, D. F., & Lindquist, S. (2010). HSP90 at the hub of protein homeostasis: emerging mechanistic insights. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 11, 515–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thibault, P. J. (2011). First-order languaging dynamics and second-order language: The distributed language view. Ecological Psychology, 23, 210–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddington, C. H. (1975). The evolution of an evolutionist. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Supported by the Charles University Project UNCE 204004 (AM), and by the Charles university grant 107/43-253166 (JL). We thank Stephen Cowley for innumerable comments, and for putting the text into tolerable English. Fatima Cvrčková is the cartoons’ creator.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anton Markoš .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Markoš, A., Švorcová, J., Lhotský, J. (2017). Living as Languaging: Distributed Knowledge in Living Beings. In: Cowley, S., Vallée-Tourangeau, F. (eds) Cognition Beyond the Brain. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49115-8_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49115-8_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-49114-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-49115-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics