Abstract
We trace life at different levels of organization and/or description: from protein ecosystems in the cell up to the cohabitation of individuals within and between historically established lineages . Ways of such cohabitation depend on experience of particular guilds or aggregates ; they cannot be easily foretold from any basic level of description, they are distributed across all levels, and across all members of the community . Such phenomena of interactivity constitute a lived world which, we argue, represents a genuine analogy with domains of human cultures and languages. We draw an analogy with three levels of meaning as defined by Rappaport (2010) and make an attempt to show that life and languaging are virtually analogous. Contributions to this volume show that cognition arises not only ‘in the head’, but also as the result of living in a network of interactions—in the medium of languaging ; language and languages cannot be separated from languaging, and our joint activities make sense because of how we concert our doings in a culture or what Thibault (2011) terms a social meshwork . Outcomes of such doings often depend also on differences that people find as meaningful cues to perform expertly or to construe wordings in a particular way. In other words, much depends on patterns that are extracted by living beings that dwell in a historical world of bodily experience , and of the community into which they are rooted. Indeed, in the context, these ideas will not seem controversial; however, in what follows, we propose taking a further step: we propose that analogical processes help all inhabitants of the biosphere /semiosphere to become valuable members such of living networks . Our approach may look as yet another contribution to the long list of holistic theories that compete without success with the reigning reductionist paradigm of biology. We, however, do not deny the explanatory power of contemporary biological theory: by stressing the role of historical bodily experience and of the “cultural” role of communities we strive towards a fuller understanding of life phenomena, much along the line the linguists undertook from the vocabularies through semiotics up to languaging . We invite the reader to take an excursion from the “central dogma ” and neodarwinian explanation of evolution , towards what we believe is a more complete view of the living, that extends through 9 orders of magnitudes (or “73 octaves of nature‘s music”, as poetically expressed by Ho (1993)) and from nanoseconds to 4 billions of years. Our extension to the distributed view is to argue that what goes for cognition and language also applies generally to life.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Such processes are especially important in the context of multicellular organisms and their ontogeny. It is important that some of them may outlive even to the next generation, thus transferring the experience of parents.
- 2.
Versions of written US and UK written English may differ in the spelling in 2% of strings. Does this explain the differences between two nations? Remarkably, this line of thinking is pursued by those who seek a genetic Word (in DNA) that is “responsible” for differences in the appearance of the living being (phenotype).
- 3.
In European history, a single “mutation”—insertion of word filioque into the Christian creed (and Son) in the 6th century—is often seen as the main “cause” of schism between Orthodox and Western Christianity.
References
Alberts, B., Johnson, A., Lewis, J., Raff, M., Roberts, K., & Walter, P. (2007). Molecular biology of the cell. New York: Garland Science.
Allis, C. D., Jenuwein, T., & Reinberg, D. (2009). Epigenetics. Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
Anfinsen, C. B. (1973). Principles that govern the folding of protein chains. The Nobel lecture. Science, 181, 223–230.
Barbieri, M. (2008a). Life is semiosis: The biosemiotic view of nature. Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, 4, 29–51.
Barbieri, M. (2008b). The code model of semiosis: The first steps toward a scientific biosemiotics. The American Journal of Semiotics, 24, 23–37.
Bergman, A., & Siegal, M. L. (2003). Evolutionary capacitance as a general feature of complex gene networks. Nature, 424, 549–552.
Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General system theory: Foundations, development, applications. New York: George Braziller.
Carroll, S. B. (2005). Endless forms most improbable. The new science of evo devo and the making of the animal kingdom. New York: Norton.
Cowley, S. J., & Vallée-Tourangeau, F. (2010). Thinking in action. AI & SOCIETY, 25, 469–475.
Davidson, E. H. (2006). Genomic regulatory systems. Development and evolution. San Diego CA: Academic Press.
Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dawkins, R. (1982). The extended phenotype. London: Freeman.
Douglas, A. E. (2010). The symbiotic habit. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
Eco, U. (1994). The limits of interpretation. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Gehring, W. (1999). Master control genes in development and evolution: The homeobox story. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Gilbert, S. F., & Epel, D. (2009). Ecological developmental biology: Integrating epigenetics, medicine, and evolution. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
Good, M. C., Zalatan, J. G., & Lim, W. A. (2011). Scaffold proteins: Hubs for controlling the flow of cellular information. Science, 332, 680–686.
Hall, B. K., Pearson, R. D., & Müller, G. (Eds.). (2004). Environment, development and evolution. Toward a synthesis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Heidegger, M. (1959/1982). The nature of language. In On the way to language (pp. 57–108). San Francisco CA: Harper.
Heidegger, M. (1995). The fundamental concepts of metaphysics. World, finitude, solitude. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Ho, M.-W. (1993). Rainbow and the worm. Singapore: World Scientific.
Hoffmeister, M., & Martin, W. (2003). Interspecific evolution: Microbial symbiosis, endosymbiosis and gene transfer. Environmental Microbiology, 5, 641–649.
Hofstadter, D. R. (1979). Gödel, Escher, Bach: An eternal golden braid. New York: Basic Books.
Kauffman, S. A. (2000). Investigations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kirsh, D. (2010). Thinking with external representations. AI & SOCIETY, 25, 441–454.
Kleisner, K., & Markoš, A. (2005). Semetic rings: Towards the new concept of mimetic resemblances. Theory in Biosciences, 123, 209–222.
Kleisner, K., & Markoš, A. (2009). Mutual understanding and misunderstanding in biological organisms mediated by self-representational meaning of organisms. Sign Systems Studies, 31, 299–309.
Linell, P. (2005). The written language bias in linguistics. London and New York: Routledge.
Love, N. (2004). Cognition and the language myth. Language Sciences, 26, 525–544.
Margulis, L., & Sagan, D. (2002). Acquiring genomes: A theory of the origins of species. New York: Basic books.
Margulis, L., & Fester, R. (Eds.). (1991). Symbiosis as a source of evolutionary innovation. speciation and morphogenesis. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Margulis, L. (1993). Symbiosis in cell evolution. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
Markoš, A., & Faltýnek, D. (2011). Language metaphors of life. Biosemiotics, 4, 171–200.
Markoš, A., & Švorcová, J. (2009). Recorded versus organic memory. Biosemiotics, 2, 131–149.
Markoš, A. (2002). Readers of the book of life. New York: Oxford University Press.
Markoš, A., Grygar, F., Hajnal, L., Kleisner, K., Kratochvíl, Z., & Neubauer, Z. (2009). Life as its own designer: Darwin’s origin and western thought. Dodrecht: Springer.
Marks, J. (2002). What it means to be 98% chimpanzee: Apes, people, and their genes. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Matsuda, R. (1987). Animal evolution in changing environment with special reference to abnormal metamorphosis. New York: Wiley & Sons.
Monod, J. (1972). Chance and necessity. Glasgow: W. Collins Sons.
Overmann, J. (Ed.). (2006). Molecular basis of symbiosis. Berlin: Springer.
Paracer, S., & Ahmadjian, V. (2000). Symbiosis. An introduction to biological associations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Poe, M. T. (2011). A history of communications: Media and society from the evolution of speech to the internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rappaport, R. A. (2010). Ritual and religion in the making of humanity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Redecker, D., Kodner, R., & Graham, L. E. (2000). Glomalean fungi from the Ordovician. Science, 289, 1920–1921.
Rutherford, S. L., & Lindquist, S. (1998). Hsp90 as a capacitor for morphological evolution. Nature, 3(96), 336–342.
Sapp, J. (1994). Evolution by association: A history of symbiosis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sapp, J. (2003). Genesis: The evolution of biology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Searls, D. B. (2002). The language of genes. Nature, 420, 211–217.
Simon, M. A. (1971). The matter of life: Philosophical problems of biology. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Švorcová, J. (2012). The phylotypic stage as a boundary of modular memory: Non mechanistic perspective. Theory in Biosciences, 131, 31–42.
Taipale, M., Jarosz, D. F., & Lindquist, S. (2010). HSP90 at the hub of protein homeostasis: emerging mechanistic insights. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 11, 515–528.
Thibault, P. J. (2011). First-order languaging dynamics and second-order language: The distributed language view. Ecological Psychology, 23, 210–245.
Waddington, C. H. (1975). The evolution of an evolutionist. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Acknowledgements
Supported by the Charles University Project UNCE 204004 (AM), and by the Charles university grant 107/43-253166 (JL). We thank Stephen Cowley for innumerable comments, and for putting the text into tolerable English. Fatima Cvrčková is the cartoons’ creator.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Markoš, A., Švorcová, J., Lhotský, J. (2017). Living as Languaging: Distributed Knowledge in Living Beings. In: Cowley, S., Vallée-Tourangeau, F. (eds) Cognition Beyond the Brain. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49115-8_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49115-8_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-49114-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-49115-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)