Skip to main content

Queuing-Oriented Job Optimizing Scheduling In Cloud Mapreduce

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances on P2P, Parallel, Grid, Cloud and Internet Computing (3PGCIC 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies ((LNDECT,volume 1))

Abstract

Cloud MapReduce, as an implementation of MapReduce framework on Cloud for big data analysis, is facing the unknown job makespan and long wait time problem, which have seriously affected the service quality. The Inefficient virtual machine allocation is one critical causing factor. Based on the M/M/1 model, a new queuing equation is built to ensure the virtual machine with the high efficiency. By jointing queuing equation and objectives function, a two variables equation group is designed to compute the desired virtual machine number for different jobs. According to the desired virtual machine number of each job, we developed a queuing-oriented job optimizing scheduling algorithm, called QTJS, to optimal job scheduling and enhance the resource utilization in Cloud MapReduce. Extensive experiments show that our QTJS algorithm consumes less job execution time and performs better efficiency than other three algorithms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. J. Dean and S. Ghemawat, “MapReduce: Simplified data processing on large clusters,” in Proc. 6th Symp. Oper. Syst. Design Implementation (OSDI), Dec. 2004, pp. 137–150.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Thabet M, Boufaida M, Kordon F. An approach for developing an interoperability mechanism between cloud providers [J]. International Journal of Space-Based and Situated Computing 27, 2014, 4(2): 88-99.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Afrati F N, Ullman J D. Optimizing joins in a map-reduce environment[C]//Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Extending Database Technology. ACM, 2010: 99-110.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Verma A, Cherkasova L, Campbell R H. Orchestrating an ensemble of MapReduce jobs for minimizing their makespan[J]. Dependable and Secure Computing, IEEE Transactions on, 2013, 10(5): 314-327.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Xilong Q, Peng X. An energy-efficient virtual machine scheduler based on CPU sharereclaiming policy [J]. International Journal of Grid and Utility Computing, 2015, 6(2): 113-120.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hacker T J, Romero F, Nielsen J J. Secure live migration of parallel applications using container-based virtual machines[J]. International Journal of Space-Based and Situated Computing 1, 2012, 2(1): 45-57.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hashem I A T, Yaqoob I, Anuar N B, et al. The rise of “big data” on cloud computing: review and open research issues [J]. Information Systems, 2015, 47: 98-115.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Manoharan M, Selvarajan S. An efficient methodology to improve service negotiation in cloud environment [J]. International Journal of Grid and Utility Computing, 2015, 6(3-4): 150-158.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dahiphale D, Karve R, Vasilakos A V, et al. An advanced MapReduce: cloud MapReduce, enhancements and applications [J]. Network and Service Management, IEEE Transactions on, 2014, 11(1): 101-115.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Liu H, Orban D. Cloud MapReduce : a MapReduce implementation on top of a cloud operating system[C]//Proceedings of the 2011 11th IEEE/ACM international symposium on cluster, cloud and grid computing. IEEE Computer Society, 2011: 464-474.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Verma A, Kaushal S. Deadline constraint heuristic-based genetic algorithm for workflow scheduling in cloud [J]. International Journal of Grid and Utility Computing, 2014, 5(2): 96-106.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Verma A, Cho B, Zea N, et al. Breaking the MapReduce stage barrier [J]. Cluster computing, 2013, 16(1): 191-206.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Saez J C, Pousa A, Castro F, et al. ACFS: a completely fair scheduler for asymmetric single-isa multicore systems[C]//Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing. ACM, 2015: 2027-2032.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shengjun X, Delong W, Suhong S. PCSP: A Preemptive Capacity Scheduler Policy for Scheduling Hadoop Jobs[J]. International Journal of Grid and Distributed Computing, 2015, 8(5): 33-46.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ting-Qin He .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

He, TQ., Cai, LJ., Deng, ZY., Meng, T., Wang, X. (2017). Queuing-Oriented Job Optimizing Scheduling In Cloud Mapreduce. In: Xhafa, F., Barolli, L., Amato, F. (eds) Advances on P2P, Parallel, Grid, Cloud and Internet Computing. 3PGCIC 2016. Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies, vol 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49109-7_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49109-7_41

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-49108-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-49109-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics