The Automatic Text Summarization Using Semantic Relevance And Hierarchical Structure Of Wordnet
In recent years, rapid development and spread of smart devices has resulted in increase in data of online documents on the Internet day by day. Growing information overload of web texts leaves users facing difficulties in browsing and understanding huge data in web pages. Therefore, in the field of automatic document summarization, diverse studies are underway to find ways of creating summaries efficiently. This study aims to propose document summarization methods using sentence segmentation and lexical chaining to extract important sentences of a given text and make a summary by excluding unnecessary sentences. Sentences of a given text are divided by analyzing their syntactic structure or identifying parts of speech of words and phrases and clauses used in the sentences. Important sentences are extracted by means of lexical chain. Results of previous document summarization research were improved through experiment, allowing for a summary using key points of a text.
KeywordsNatural Language Processing Split sentence Automatic Text Summarization lexical chain
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.YongdoKim, “Text binds Theory”. Pusan University of Foreign Studies Press. 1996Google Scholar
- 2.Harabagiu, S. Finley L. “Topic Themes for Multi Document Summarization,” In proceeding of ACM SIGIR, 202-209, 2005.Google Scholar
- 3.Sakurai, T., Utsumi, A. “Query-based Multi document Summarization for Information Retrieval,” The Proceeding of NTCIR, 2004.Google Scholar
- 4.Goldstein. J., Mittal. V. Carbonell. J., Callan. J.,”Creating and Evaluating Multi-Document Sentence Extract Summaries,” The Proceeding of CIKM, 165-172, 2000.Google Scholar
- 5.Inderjeet Mani, Automatic Summarization, Kohn Benjamins publishing Co., 2001.Google Scholar
- 6.Xiaojun Wan, Jianwu Yang “Multi-Doucument Summarization Using Cluster-based Ling Analysis”. Proceedings of the International Conference SiGIR’08, 2008. PP. 299-306Google Scholar
- 7.Lewis, D.D, Sparck Jones, K. “Natural language processing for information retrieval,” Communications of the ACM, Vol. 39, No.1, 1996, pp. 92-101Google Scholar
- 8.Liddy, E.D, Myaeng, S.H. “DR-LINK’s: linguistic-comceptual approach to document and detection,”,” The First Text The First Text REtreival Conference (TREC-1), 1993, pp. 113-129.Google Scholar
- 9.Morris, J, Hirst, G. “Lexical cohesion computed by thesaural relations as an indicator of the structure of text,” Computational Linguistics, Vol.17, No.1, pp. 21-43, 1991.Google Scholar
- 10.JunSeok Cha, Seunghyeon Bak, PanKoo Kim. “An Approach of Sentence Segmentation for Improving Parsing Effecieny” Korea MultimediA Society Vol. 19, No. 1, 2016. Pp.63-66Google Scholar
- 11.C.Y.Lin, E.H.Hovy, “Automatic evaluation of summaries using n-gram co-occurrence statistics”, In Proceedings of Human Language Technology Conference (HLT-NAACL 2003), Edmonton, Canada, May, 2004.Google Scholar
- 12.Young-In Song, Kyoung-Soo Han, Hae-Chang Rim. “Automatic Summarization based on Lexical Chains considering Word Assocication.”, The 14th Annual Conference on Human & Cognitive Language Technology 2002. pp. 300-305Google Scholar