Advertisement

A Fuzzy-Based Simulation System for Actor Selection in Wireless Sensor and Actor Networks Considering as a New Parameter Density of Actor Nodes

  • Donald ElmaziEmail author
  • Tetsuya Oda
  • Evjola Spaho
  • Elis Kulla
  • Makoto Ikeda
  • Leonard Barolli
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies book series (LNDECT, volume 2)

Abstract

Wireless Sensor and Actor Networks (WSANs), refers to a group of sensors and actors that get the information about the physical environment and perform appropriate actions. In order to provide effective sensing and acting, a distributed local coordination mechanism is necessary among sensors and actors. In this work, we propose a fuzzy-based system for selection in WSANs. Our system uses four input parameters. Different from our previous work, we consider also the Density of Actor (DOA) parameter. The system output is Actor Selection Decision (ASD). The simulation results show that the proposed system has a good behaviour and makes a proper selection of actor nodes.

Keywords

Fuzzy Logic Actor Network Actor Node Fuzzy Logic Controller Sink Mobility 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    I. Akyildiz, W. Su, Y. Sankarasubramaniam, and E. Cayirci, “Wireless sensor networks: a survey,” Computer Networks (Elsevier), vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 393–422, 2002.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    I. F. Akyildiz and I. H. Kasimoglu, “Wireless sensor and actor networks: Research challenges,” Ad Hoc Networks Journal (Elsevier), vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 351–367, October 2004.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    N. Haider, M. Imran, N. Saad, and M. Zakariya, “Performance analysis of reactive connectivity restoration algorithms for wireless sensor and actor networks,” in Communications (MICC-2013), IEEE Malaysia International Conference on, Nov 2013, pp. 490–495.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. Abbasi, M. Younis, and K. Akkaya, “Movement-assisted connectivity restoration in wireless sensor and actor networks,” IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 1366–1397, Sept 2009.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    X. Li, X. Liang, R. Lu, S. He, J. Chen, and X. Shen, “Toward reliable actor services in wireless sensor and actor networks,” in Mobile Adhoc and Sensor Systems (MASS), 2011 IEEE 8th International Conference on, Oct 2011, pp. 351–360.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    K. Akkaya and M. Younis, “Cola: A coverage and latency aware actor placement for wireless sensor and actor networks,” in Vehicular Technology (VTC-2006) Fall, IEEE 64th Conference on, Sept 2006, pp. 1–5.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. Kakarla and B. Majhi, “A new optimal delay and energy efficient coordination algorithm for wsan,” in Advanced Networks and Telecommuncations Systems (ANTS), 2013 IEEE International Conference on, Dec 2013, pp. 1–6.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    E. Kulla, M. Ikeda, and B. Leonard, “A fuzzy approach to actor selection in wireless sensor and actor networks,” in The 17-th International Conference on Network-Based Information Systems (NBiS-2014), Salerno, Italy, September 2014, pp. 244–248.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. Akbas and D. Turgut, “Apawsan: Actor positioning for aerial wireless sensor and actor networks,” in Local Computer Networks (LCN), 2011 IEEE 36th Conference on, Oct 2011, pp. 563–570.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    M. Akbas, M. Brust, and D. Turgut, “Local positioning for environmental monitoring in wireless sensor and actor networks,” in Local Computer Networks (LCN), 2010 IEEE 35th Conference on, Oct 2010, pp. 806–813.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    T. Melodia, D. Pompili, V. Gungor, and I. AkyildizZX, “Communication and coordination in wireless sensor and actor networks,” IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, vol. 6, no. 10, pp. 1126–1129, October 2007.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    V. Gungor, O. Akan, and I. Akyildiz, “A real-time and reliable transport (rt2) protocol for wireless sensor and actor networks,” Networking, IEEE/ACM Transactions on, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 359–370, April 2008.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    K. Selvaradjou, N. Handigol, A. Franklin, and C. Murthy, “Energy-efficient directional routing between partitioned actors in wireless sensor and actor networks,” Communications, IET, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 102–115, January 2010.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    H. Nakayama, Z. Fadlullah, N. Ansari, and N. Kato, “A novel scheme for wsan sink mobility based on clustering and set packing techniques,” Automatic Control, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 56, no. 10, pp. 2381–2389, Oct 2011.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    T. Inaba, S. Sakamoto, V. Kolici, G. Mino, and L. Barolli, “A CAC Scheme Based on Fuzzy Logic for Cellular Networks Considering Security and Priority Parameters,” The 9-th International Conference on Broadband and Wireless Computing, Communication and Applications (BWCCA-2014), pp. 340–346, 2014.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    E. Spaho, S. Sakamoto, L. Barolli, F. Xhafa, V. Barolli, and J. Iwashige, “A Fuzzy-Based System for Peer Reliability in JXTA-Overlay P2P Considering Number of Interactions,” The 16th International Conference on Network-Based Information Systems (NBiS-2013), pp. 156–161, 2013.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    K. Matsuo, D. Elmazi, Y. Liu, S. Sakamoto, G. Mino, and L. Barolli, “FACS-MP: A Fuzzy Admission Control System with Many Priorities for Wireless Cellular Networks and Its Performance Evaluation,” Journal of High Speed Networks, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2015.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Y. Liu, S. Sakamoto, K. Matsuo, M. Ikeda, L. Barolli, and F. Xhafa, “Improving Reliability of JXTA-Overlay P2P Platform: A Comparison Study for Two Fuzzy-based Systems,” Journal of High Speed Networks, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 27–45, 2015.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    M. Grabisch, “The Application of Fuzzy Integrals in Multicriteria Decision Making,” European journal of operational research, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 445–456, 1996.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    T. Inaba, D. Elmazi, Y. Liu, S. Sakamoto, L. Barolli, and K. Uchida, “Integrating Wireless Cellular and Ad-Hoc Networks Using Fuzzy Logic Considering Node Mobility and Security,” The 29th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops (WAINA-2015), pp. 54–60, 2015.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    E. Kulla, G. Mino, S. Sakamoto, M. Ikeda, S. Caball´e, and L. Barolli, “FBMIS: A Fuzzy-Based Multi-interface System for Cellular and Ad Hoc Networks,” International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (AINA-2014), pp. 180–185, 2014.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    D. Elmazi, E. Kulla, T. Oda, E. Spaho, S. Sakamoto, and L. Barolli, “A Comparison Study of Two Fuzzy-based Systems for Selection of Actor Node in Wireless Sensor Actor Networks,” Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, pp. 1–11, 2015.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    L. Zadeh, “Fuzzy logic, neural networks, and soft computing,” ACM Communications, pp. 77–84, 1994.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    E. Spaho, S. Sakamoto, L. Barolli, F. Xhafa, and M. Ikeda, “Trustworthiness in P2P: Performance Behaviour of Two Fuzzy-based Systems for JXTA-overlay Platform,” Soft Computing, vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 1783–1793, 2014.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    T. Inaba, S. Sakamoto, E. Kulla, S. Caballe, M. Ikeda, and L. Barolli, “An Integrated System for Wireless Cellular and Ad-Hoc Networks Using Fuzzy Logic,” International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems (INCoS-2014), pp. 157–162, 2014.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    K. Matsuo, D. Elmazi, Y. Liu, S. Sakamoto, and L. Barolli, “A Multi-modal Simulation System for Wireless Sensor Networks: A Comparison Study Considering Stationary and Mobile Sink and Event,” Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, pp. 1–11, 2015.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    V. Kolici, T. Inaba, A. Lala, G. Mino, S. Sakamoto, and L. Barolli, “A Fuzzy-Based CAC Scheme for Cellular Networks Considering Security,” International Conference on Network-Based Information Systems (NBiS-2014), pp. 368–373, 2014.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Y. Liu, S. Sakamoto, K. Matsuo, M. Ikeda, L. Barolli, and F. Xhafa, “A Comparison Study for Two Fuzzy-based Systems: Improving Reliability and Security of JXTA-overlay P2P Platform,” Soft Computing, pp. 1–11, 2015.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    K. Matsuo, D. Elmazi, Y. Liu, S. Sakamoto, G. Mino, and L. Barolli, “FACS-MP: A Fuzzy Admission Control System with Many Priorities for Wireless Cellular Networks and Its Perforemance Evaluation,” Journal of High Speed Network, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2015.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    J. M. Mendel, “Fuzzy logic systems for engineering: a tutorial,” Proc. of the IEEE, vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 345–377, 1995.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Donald Elmazi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Tetsuya Oda
    • 2
  • Evjola Spaho
    • 3
  • Elis Kulla
    • 4
  • Makoto Ikeda
    • 2
  • Leonard Barolli
    • 2
  1. 1.Graduate School of EngineeringFukuoka Institute of Technology (FIT)FukuokaJapan
  2. 2.Department of Information and Communication EngineeringFukuoka Institute of Technology (FIT)FukuokaJapan
  3. 3.Department of Electronics and TelecommunicationPolytechnic University of TiranaTiranaAlbania
  4. 4.Department of Information and Computer EngineeringOkayama University of ScienceOkayamaJapan

Personalised recommendations