Skip to main content

A Process Framework for Designing Software Reference Architectures for Providing Tools as a Service

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Product-Focused Software Process Improvement (PROFES 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 10027))

Abstract

Software Reference Architecture (SRA), which is a generic architecture solution for a specific type of software systems, provides foundation for the design of concrete architectures in terms of architecture design guidelines and architecture elements. The complexity and size of certain types of software systems need customized and systematic SRA design and evaluation methods. In this paper, we present a software Reference Architecture Design process Framework (RADeF) that can be used for analysis, design and evaluation of the SRA for provisioning of Tools as a Service as part of a cloud-enabled workSPACE (TSPACE). The framework is based on the state of the art results from literature and our experiences with designing software architectures for cloud-based systems. We have applied RADeF SRA design two types of TSPACE: software architecting TSPACE and software implementation TSPACE. The presented framework emphasizes on keeping the conceptual meta-model of the domain under investigation at the core of SRA design strategy and use it as a guiding tool for design, evaluation, implementation and evolution of the SRA. The framework also emphasizes to consider the nature of the tools to be provisioned and underlying cloud platforms to be used while designing SRA. The framework recommends adoption of the multi-faceted approach for evaluation of SRA and quantifiable measurement scheme to evaluate quality of the SRA. We foresee that RADeF can facilitate software architects and researchers during design, application and evaluation of a SRA and its instantiations into concrete software systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://aws.amazon.com/.

  2. 2.

    http://jax-rs-spec.java.net/.

  3. 3.

    https://jax-ws.java.net/.

  4. 4.

    https://jena.apache.org/.

  5. 5.

    http://www.jbpm.org/.

References

  1. Angelov, S., Trienekens, J., Kusters, R.: Software reference architectures - exploring their usage and design in practice. In: Drira, K. (ed.) ECSA 2013. LNCS, vol. 7957, pp. 17–24. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-39031-9_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Angelov, S., Grefen, P., Greefhorst, D.: A framework for analysis and design of software reference architectures. Inf. Softw. Technol. 54(4), 417–431 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Avgeriou, P.: Describing, instantiating and evaluating a reference architecture: a case study. Enterp. Archit. J., 24 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kruchten, P.B.: The 4 + 1 view model of architecture. IEEE Softw. 12(6), 42–50 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Buschmann, F., et al.: Pattern-Oriented Software Architecture: A System of Patterns, p. 457. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chauhan, M.A., Ali Babar, M., Sheng, Q.Z.: A reference architecture for a cloud-based tools as a service workspace, In: 2015 IEEE Conference on Service Computing (SCC). IEEE, New York (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Angelov, S., Trienekens, J.J.M., Grefen, P.: Towards a method for the evaluation of reference architectures: experiences from a case. In: Morrison, R., Balasubramaniam, D., Falkner, K. (eds.) ECSA 2008. LNCS, vol. 5292, pp. 225–240. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-88030-1_17

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Dourish, P., Bellotti, V.: Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces. In: Proceedings of the 1992 ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 107–114. ACM, Toronto (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sodhi, B., Prabhakar, T.V.: Application architecture considerations for cloud platforms. In: 2011 Third International Conference on Communication Systems and Networks (COMSNETS), p. 1–4. IEEE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Domingo, E.J., et al.: CLOUDIO: a cloud computing-oriented multi-tenant architecture for business information systems. In: 2010 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Cloud Computing (CLOUD), pp. 532–533. IEEE (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Calheiros, R.N., et al.: The Aneka platform and QoS-driven resource provisioning for elastic applications on hybrid Clouds. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 28(6), 861–870 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Han, R., et al.: Enabling cost-aware and adaptive elasticity of multi-tier cloud applications. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 32, 82–98 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Brandic, I., Music, D., Dustdar, S.: Service mediation and negotiation bootstrapping as first achievements towards self-adaptable grid and cloud services. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference Industry Session on Grids Meets Autonomic Computing, pp. 1–8. ACM, Barcelona (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bass, L., Clements, P., Kazman, R.: Software Architecture in Practice, p. 640. Addison-Wesley Professional, Boston (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Avgeriou, P., Zdun, U.: Architectural patterns revisited–a pattern (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Angelov, S., Grefen, P.: An e-contracting reference architecture. J. Syst. Softw. 81(11), 1816–1844 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kazman, R., et al.: The architecture tradeoff analysis method. In: 1998 Proceedings of the Fourth IEEE International Conference on Engineering of Complex Computer Systems, ICECCS 1998 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kazman, R., et al.: SAAM: a method for analyzing the properties of software architectures. In: 1994 Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE-16 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kordy, B., et al.: Attack–defense trees. J. Logic Comput., exs029 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  20. IEEE Recommended Practice for Architectural Description of Software-Intensive Systems. IEEE Std 1471-2000, pp. i–23 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  21. ISO/IEC/IEEE Systems and software engineering – Architecture description. ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010:2011(E) (Revision of ISO/IEC 42010:2007 and IEEE Std 1471-2000), pp. 1–46 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Chauhan, M.A.: Foundations for Tools as a Service Workspace: A Reference Architecture. Ph.D. Dissertation, IT University of Copenhagen, Denmark (ITU-DS; No. 118) (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Chauhan, M.A., Babar, M.A.: PTaaS: Platform for Providing Software Developing Applications and Tools as a Service. Technical report TR-2014-176 (2014). https://pure.itu.dk/ws/files/74130379/TR_2014_176.pdf

  24. Azeez, A., et al.: Multi-tenant SOA middleware for cloud computing. In: 2010 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Cloud Computing (CLOUD), pp. 458–465. IEEE (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Huhns, M.N., Singh, M.P.: Service-oriented computing: key concepts and principles. IEEE Internet Comput. 9(1), 75–81 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Fielding, R.T.: Architectural Styles and the Design of Network-Based Software Architectures, p. 162. University of California, Irvine (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Nakagawa, E.Y., Barbosa, E.F., Maldonado, J.C.: Exploring ontologies to support the establishment of reference architectures: an example on software testing. In: Joint Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture, 2009 & European Conference on Software Architecture, WICSA/ECSA 2009. IEEE (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Martínez-Fernández, S., et al.: Artifacts of software reference architectures: a case study. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering. ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ali Babar, M.: A framework for groupware-supported software architecture evaluation process in global software development. J. Softw. Evol. Process 24(2), 207–229 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammad Aufeef Chauhan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chauhan, M.A., Babar, M.A., Probst, C.W. (2016). A Process Framework for Designing Software Reference Architectures for Providing Tools as a Service. In: Abrahamsson, P., Jedlitschka, A., Nguyen Duc, A., Felderer, M., Amasaki, S., Mikkonen, T. (eds) Product-Focused Software Process Improvement. PROFES 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10027. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49094-6_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49094-6_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-49093-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-49094-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics