Skip to main content

Why Should the Individual and Organization Practice Scenario Thinking?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 3960 Accesses

Abstract

Scenarios have been used over decades by governments, businesses and non-governmental and not-for-profit organizations. Across each of these sectors, examples like the Singapore government, Shell Global and the UK National Council for Voluntary Organisations show the value attached to scenarios. In this age of uncertainty surrounding political, social, economic and environmental changes across the world, we see a clear need for all individuals and organizations to use scenario thinking. In the past year, as we complete our writing in early 2017, we have seen the unfolding of events that, as our later examples of scenario projects will illustrate, were found totally implausible, and even laughable, less than a year ago.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For an overview of the Singapore government scenario programme, see: http://www.csf.gov.sg/our-work/our-approach.

  2. 2.

    Shell Global’s current publicly-available scenario outlines can be found at: http://www.shell.com/energy-and-innovation/the-energy-future/scenarios.html.

  3. 3.

    For the UK National Council for Voluntary Organisations’ overview of the value of scenarios, see: https://knowhownonprofit.org/organisation/strategy/externalanalysis/scenario-planning.

  4. 4.

    A record of organizations that have appeared in the Fortune Global 500 over time can be sourced at: http://www.fortune.com.

  5. 5.

    For an overview of Xerox’s programme to develop ‘innovation at work’ and to explore ‘trends (that) are shaping the world of work’, visit: https://www.xerox.com/en-us/about.

References

  • Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Anchor Books–Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierbooms, J. J. P. A., Bongers, I. M. B., & van Oers, H. A. M. (2011). A Scenario Analysis of the Future Residential Requirements for People with Mental Health Problems in Eindhoven. BMC Medical Informatics, 11(1). Retrieved March 3, 2017, from https://bmcmedinformdecismak.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1472-6947-11-1

  • Bradfield, R., Wright, G., Cairns, G., van der Heijden, K., & Burt, G. (2005). The Origins and Evolution of Scenario Techniques in Long Range Business Planning. Futures, 37, 795–812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cairns, G., Śliwa, M., & Wright, G. (2010). Problematizing International Business Futures Through a ‘Critical Scenario Method’. Futures, 42, 971–979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cairns, G., Wright, G., Bradfield, R., van der Heijden, K., & Burt, G. (2004). Exploring E-Government Futures Through the Application of Scenario Planning. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 71, 217–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cairns, G., Wright, G., & Fairbrother, P. (2016). Promoting Articulated Action from Diverse Stakeholders in Response to Public Policy Scenarios: A Case Study of the Use of ‘Scenario Improvisation’ Method. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 103, 97–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cairns, G., Wright, G., Fairbrother, P., & Phillips, R. (2017). ‘Branching Scenarios’ Seeking Articulated Action for Regional Regeneration—A Case Study of Limited Success. Technological Forecasting and Social Changehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.01.014

  • Cairns, G., Wright, G., van der Heijden, K., Bradfield, R., & Burt, G. (2006). Enhancing Foresight Between Multiple Agencies: Issues in the Use of Scenario Thinking to Overcome Fragmentation. Futures: The Journal of Policy, Planning and Future Studies, 38, 1010–1025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Centre for Strategic Futures. (2015). A Short History of Futures Work in the Singapore Government. History. Retrieved March 7, 2017, from http://www.csf.gov.sg/about-us/history

  • Courtney, H., Lovallo, D., & Clarke, C. (2013). Deciding How to Decide. Harvard Business Review, 91(11), 62.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Jouvenal, B. (1967). The Art of Conjecture. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flyvbjerg, B. (1998). Rationality and Power: Democracy in Practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foresight Horizon Scanning Centre. (2009). Scenario Planning: Guidance Note. London: Government Office for Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E. (1994). The Politics of Stakeholder Theory: Some Future Directions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4), 409–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamel, G. (2000). Leading the Revolution. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgkinson, G. P. (2001). The Psychology of Strategic Management: Diversity and Cognition Revisited. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (Vol. 16, pp. 65–119). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgkinson, G. P., & Sparrow, P. R. (2002). The Competent Organization: A Psychological Analysis of the Strategic Management Process. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, N. (2009). A Historical Overview of Strategic Scenario Planning. Working Paper of the UKERC and EON/EPSRC Transition Pathways Project. London: UK Energy Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, A. C. (1999). Scenario Planning: Strategic Thinking Goes Back to the Future. The Public Manager: The New Bureaucrat, 28(3), 62.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, M. (2001). Australia 2020: Foresight for Our Future (Research Paper No. 18 2000–2001). Canberra: Department of the Parliamentary Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jungermann, H., & Thuring, M. (1987). The Use of Mental Models for Generating Scenarios. In G. Wright & P. Ayton (Eds.), Judgmental Forecasting. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1994). The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (1998). Strategy Safari: The Complete Guide Through the Wilds of Strategic Management. London: FT Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pincombe, B., Blunden, S., Pincombe, A., & Dexter, P. (2013). Ascertaining a Hierarchy of Dimensions from Time-Poor Experts: Linking Tactical Vignettes to Strategic Scenarios. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80, 584–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roxburgh, C. (2009, November). The Use and Abuse of Scenarios. Strategy & Corporate Finance. Retrieved March 7, 2017, from http://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our-insights/the-use-and-abuse-of-scenarios

  • Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1993). Multiple Scenario Development: Its Conceptual and Behavioural Foundation. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 192–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoemaker, P. J. H., & van der Heijden, C. A. H. M. (1992). Integrating Scenarios into Strategic Planning at Royal Dutch/Shell. Planning Review, 20(3), 41–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, P. (1991). The Art of the Long View: Planning for the Future in an Uncertain World. New York: Currency Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • State of Victoria. (2013). Strategic and Business Planning Tools for Not-for-Profit Organisations. Summary Report, June 2013. Melbourne: Department of Human Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Heijden, K. (1996). Scenarios: The Art of Strategic Conversation. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Heijden, K., Bradfield, R., Burt, G., Cairns, G., & Wright, G. (2002). The Sixth Sense: Accelerating Organizational Learning with Scenarios. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wack, P. (1985a). Scenarios: Uncharted waters ahead. Harvard Business Review, 63(5), 73–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wack, P. (1985b). Scenarios: Shooting the Rapids. Harvard Business Review, 63(6), 139–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, A., & Kupers, R. (2013). Living in the futures. Harvard Business Review, 91(5), 118–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, G., Bradfield, R., & Cairns, G. (2013). Does the Intuitive Logics Method—and Its Recent Enhancements—Produce ‘Effective’ Scenarios? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80, 631–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, G., Cairns, G., & Goodwin, P. (2009). Scenario Planning: Lessons from Practice in Academe and Business. European Journal of Operational Research, 194(1), 323–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, G., van der Heijden, K., Bradfield, R., Burt, G., & Cairns, G. (2004). The Psychology of Why Organizations Can Be Slow to Adapt and Change. Journal of General Management, 29(4), 21–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, G., van der Heijden, K., Burt, G., Bradfield, R., & Cairns, G. (2008). Scenario Planning Interventions in Organizations: An Analysis of the Causes of Success and Failure. Futures, 40, 218–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cairns, G., Wright, G. (2018). Why Should the Individual and Organization Practice Scenario Thinking?. In: Scenario Thinking. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49067-0_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics