Advertisement

Neural Plasticity and the Malleability of Pain

  • Grant GillettEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Pain is a product of our neural networks painstakingly formed through phylogeny and ontogeny. Neural pathways form within neural nets as a result of long term potentiation and other dynamic mechanisms that subserve learning and memory and are modified so therefore form a key part of what Foucault calls “a volume in perpetual disintegration,” constantly reinforcing connections that capture points of experiential association and gradually dismantling networks that are no longer relevant to the organism’s affordances (points of biological significance in a stimulus environment). Human pain, seen as an experience with a pivotal role in human interactions, and with a number of psychologically inflected varieties and meanings, is therefore not only a neural phenomenon, but also a moral one. It is moral in that it reflects influences from our engagement in a context of human adaptation that is discursive and interpersonal, one that is heavily inscribed by cultural stereotypes and practices that shape who we are and how we understand and give an account of ourselves. To be, in that sense, is to be humanly engaged in the world, including the world of the clinic and its mores whenever and wherever we enter into it.

Keywords

Phantom Limb Pain Substantia Gelatinosa Phantom Pain Human Pain Bucket Brigade 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Aguggia M (2003) Neurophysiology of pain. Neurol Sci 24:557–560Google Scholar
  2. Dennett D (1978/1981) Brainstorms. M.I.T. Press/Brighton, Harvester Press, Cambridge, p 228Google Scholar
  3. Fields H (1988) Sources of variability in the sensation of pain. Pain 33:195–200CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Fields H (2004) State-dependent opioid control of pain. Nat Rev Neurosci 7:565–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Foucault M (1997) Ethics, subjectivity and truth. In: Rabinow P, Hurley R (eds) The essential works of Michel Foucault, Penguin, London, 1954–1984Google Scholar
  6. Friston K (2010) The free energy principle: a unified brain theory? Nat Rev Neurosci 11:127–134CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Gaetz M, Goodman H, Weinberg H (2000) Electrophysiological evidence for the cumulative effects of concussion. Brain Inj 14(12):1077–1088CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Gillett G (2005) Culture, truth, and science after Lacan. J Bioethic Inq 12:633–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gillett G, Franz E (2014) Evolutionary neurology, responsive equilibrium, and the moral brain. Conscious Cogn http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S105381001400172X
  10. Harre R, Gillett G (1994) The discursive mind. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Hudson AJ (2000) Pain perception and response: central nervous system mechanisms. Can J Neurol Sci 27(1):2–16PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hughlings-Jackson J (1887) Remarks on the evolution and dissolution of the nervous system. Br J Psychiatry 33:25–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hurley S (2008) The shared circuits model (SCM): how control, mirroring, and simulation can enable imitation, deliberation and mindreading. Behav Brain Sci 31:1–58CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Kripke S (1979) Identity and necessity. In: Honderich T, Burnyeat M (eds) Philosophy as it is. Penguin, London, p 506Google Scholar
  15. Kristeva J (1995) The new maladies of the soul. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Lacan J (1981) The four fundamental concepts of psychoanalysis. Norton and Co., LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. Lacan J (1977) Ecrits (trans: Sheridan A). Norton and Co., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Melzack R, Coderre T, Katz J, Vaccarino A (2001) Central neuroplasticity and pathological pain. ANYAS 933:157–174. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb05822.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Melzack R (1976) The perception of pain. In: Thompson RF (ed) Physiological psychology. W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco, p 226Google Scholar
  20. Mountcastle VB (1968) Medical physiology, 12th edn. Mosby, St Louis, p 1425Google Scholar
  21. Nelkin R (1994) Reconsidering pain. Philos Psychol 7(3):325–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Petersen-Felix S, Curatolo M (2002) Neuoplasiticty—an important factor in chronic and acute pain. Swiss Med Wkly 132:273–278PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Price D (2000) Psychological and neural mechanisms of the affective dimension of pain. Science 288:1768–1772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Quine WVO (1981) Theories and things. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, p 1Google Scholar
  25. Rainville P, Duncan GH, Price DD, Carrier B, Bushnell MC (1997) Pain affect encoded in human anterior cingulate but not somatosensory cortex. Science 277(5328):968–971CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Ramachandran VS, Blakeslee S (1998) Phantoms in the brain. William Morrow, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Strawson G (1994) Mental reality. MIT Press, Cambridge, p 245Google Scholar
  28. Truex R, Carpenter M (1969) Human neuroanatomy, 6th edn. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, p 588Google Scholar
  29. Wall P (1961) Two transmission systems for skin sensations. In: Sensory Communications, Symposium, Boston 1959. Wiley and Sons, London, p 844Google Scholar
  30. Wall P (1978) The gate control theory of pain mechanisms: a re-examination and re-statement. Brain 101:1–18CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Wall P (1999) Pain: the science of suffering. Orion, London, p 51Google Scholar
  32. Wittgenstein L (1953) Philosophical Investigations (trans: Anscombe GEM). Blackwell, Oxford; hereinafter PI, paragraphs indicated §nn. (§296)Google Scholar
  33. Woolf CJ, Mannion RJ (1999) Neuropathic pain: aetology, symptoms, mechanisms, and management. Lancet 353:1959–1964CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Woolf C, Salter M (2000) Neuroplasticity: increasing the gain in pain. Science 288:1765–1768CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Young JZ (1979) Pain and Mood. In: Wolstenholme G (ed) Brain and mind. CIBA, Amsterdam, p 327Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Health Sciences, Bioethics CenterUniversity of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations