Design, Construction and Analysis of Model Dataset for Indian Road Network and Performing Classification to Estimate Accuracy of Different Classifier with Its Comparison Summary Evaluation

  • Suwarna GothaneEmail author
  • M. V. Sarode
  • K. Srujan Raju
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9873)


Road network consist of various problems. Pothole, crack and patches are the common problems of road network. Various manual and automated solutions have been proposed by the expertise in the previous work. To overcome the problem we have came here with a novel solution approach to identify road quality. Identification of maintenance severity level and providing repair solution is done using WEKA tool 3.7. This paper presents comparison summary of classification approach and estimated which algorithm gives efficient accuracy for classification. In this paper we have obtained highest accuracy of classification 98.84 % by Support Vector Machine (SMO Function).


Pothole Patches Road Cracks Classification algorithm Accuracy 


  1. 1.
    Kim, Taehyeong, Ryu, Seung-Ki: System and method for detecting potholes based on video data. Proc. Emerg. Trends Comput. Inf. Sci. 5(9), 703–709 (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Varadharajan, S., Jose, S., Sharma, K., Wander, L., Mertz, C.: Vision for road inspection. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, Steamboat Springs, Colorado, USA, pp. 115–122 (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lokeshwor, H., Lalit Kumar, S.: Method for automated assessment of potholes, cracks and patches from road surface video clips. In: Proceedings of 2nd Conference on Transportation Research Group of India, vol. 104, pp. 312–321. Elsevier (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chambon, S., Moliard, J.-M.: Automatic road pavement assessment with image processing review and comparison. In: Proceedings of International Journal of Geophysics, Hindawi Publishing Corporation, vol. 2011, pp. 1–20, June 2011Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Koch, C., Brilakis, I.: Pothole detection in asphalt pavement images. In: Proceeding on Advanced Engineering Informatics, vol. 25, pp. 507–515. Elsevier Ltd., August 2011Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Su, Y., Wang, M.: Improved C-V segmentation model based on local information for pavement distress images. In: Proceedings of 3rd International Congress, IEEE Conference on Image and Signal Processing, Yantai, vol. 3, pp. 1415–1418, October 2010Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liu, F., Xu, G., Yang, Y., Niu, X.: Novel approach to pavement cracking automatic detection based on segment extending. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Knowledge Acquisition and Modeling, Wuhan, pp. 610–614. IEEE, December 2008Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sun, Z., Li, W., Sha, A.: Automatic pavement cracks detection system based on Visual Studio C++ 6.0. In: Proceedings of IEEE Sixth International Conference Natural Computation, Yantai, Shandong, vol. 4, pp. 2016–2019, August 2010Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mahmood, M., Rahman, M., Nolle, L.: A fuzzy logic approach for pavement section classification. Proc. Int. J. Pavement Res. Technol. 6, 620–626 (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Suman, S.K., Sinha, S.: Pavement maintenance treatment selection using fuzzy logic inference system. Proc. Int. J. Eng. Innovative Technol. 2, 172–175 (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sandra, A.K., Vinayaka Rao, V.R., Raju, K.S., Sarkar, A.K.: Prioritization of pavement stretches using fuzzy MCDM approach fuzzy logic. In: Saad, A., Dahal, K., Sarfraz, M., Roy, R. (eds.) Soft Computing Using Industrial Applications, vol. 39, pp. 265–276. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fwa, T.F., Shanmugam, R.: Fuzzy logic technique for pavement condition rating and maintenance. In: Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Managing Pavements, Center for Transportation Research, pp. 465–476. National University of Singapore (1998)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Oliveira, H., Correia, P.L.: Automatic road crack detection and characterization. Proc. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 14, 155–168 (2013). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Saar, T., Talvik, O.: Automatic Asphalt pavement crack detection and classification using neural networks. In: Proceedings of IEEE Electronics Conference, 12th Biennial Baltic, Tallinn, pp. 345–348, October 2010Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Xu, G., Ma, J., Liu, F., Niu, X.: Automatic recognition of pavement surface crack based on BP neural network. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference Computer and Electrical Engineering, Phuket, pp. 19–22, December 2008Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bhoraskar, R., Vankadhara, N., Raman, B., Kulkarni, P.: Traffic and road condition estimation using smartphone sensors. In: Proceedings of IEEE COMSNETS, pp. 1–6, 2012Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mohan, P., Padmanabhan, V.N., Ramjee, R.: Rich monitoring of road and traffic conditions using mobile smartphones. In: Proceedings of 6th ACM Conference on Embedded Network Sensor Systems, pp. 357–358, November 2008Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Salman, M., Mathavan, S., Kamal, K., Rahman, M.: Pavement crack detection using the Gabor filter. In: Proceedings of IEEE 16th International Conference Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 93, pp. 2039–2044, October 2013Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Suwarna Gothane
    • 1
    Email author
  • M. V. Sarode
    • 2
  • K. Srujan Raju
    • 1
  1. 1.CMR Technical CampusHyderabadIndia
  2. 2.Jagadambha College of Engineering and TechnologyYavatmalIndia

Personalised recommendations