Skip to main content

Commandment 8

Linked: People, Media and Networks

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Communication Excellence

Abstract

We all love to be connected. Today we are saturated with opportunities to make friends, meet up with colleagues, find new partners and search for old ones. It is surprising we can keep any relationships as we solicit, pursue, build, relocate and re-establish numerous individual and group relationships. And this is just in our private lives. As communicators we then overlay this with professional work contacts, which spread and grow particularly over social media platforms. But it has always been this way for the professional communicator with a journalistic lineage to the ‘contacts’ book. So how does this play out in today’s world? And, explicitly, in the contemporary communication department? How do the best communicators within these excellent departments manage relationships? In this chapter we explore the challenges of what we discuss as the key criteria of excellence in this eighth commandment: be intricately linked both inside and outside the organisation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Nothhaft (2010).

  2. 2.

    Zerfass et al. (2016), pp. 42–50.

  3. 3.

    Zerfass et al. (2016), p. 44. n = 2,710 communication professionals across Europe. Q: Please think about how you spend most of your time at work. Please divide your productive time spent at work (values should add up to 100 per cent). In a typical week, I spend the following amount of time with…figure displays median for each item; values have been rounded based on mean values.

  4. 4.

    Zerfass et al. (2016), p. 63, n = 2,583 communication professionals across Europe; Macnamara et al. (2015), n = 1,148 communication professionals across Asia-Pacific; Moreno et al. (2015), n = 803 communication professionals across Latin America. Q: How important are the following methods in addressing stakeholders, gatekeepers and audiences today? Scale 1 (not important) – 5 (very important). Percentages: frequency based on scale points 4–5. Overall evaluation based on 4,534 respondents in 84 countries.

  5. 5.

    Zerfass et al. (2016), pp. 51–53.

  6. 6.

    Zerfass and Viertmann (2016).

  7. 7.

    Zerfass et al. (2016), p. 51. nmin = 1,907 communication professionals who spend at least 10 per cent of their time for coaching, training, consulting and enabling. Q: When you coach, advise or enable executives/senior managers or other members of your organisation/client, how often do you practice the following activities? Scale 1 (not at all) – 5 (very often) for both categories. Percentages: frequency based on scale points 4–5.

  8. 8.

    Johansson and Ottestig (2011), p. 164.

  9. 9.

    Valentini (2010), p. 158.

  10. 10.

    Valentini (2010), p. 160.

  11. 11.

    Arthur W. Page Society (2008).

  12. 12.

    Arthur W. Page Society (2008).

  13. 13.

    Gregory (2011), p. 99.

  14. 14.

    Zerfass et al. (2016), p. 116. n = 1,504 communication professionals working in communication departments across Europe. Q: Within your organisation, the top communication manager or chief communication officer…is a member of the executive board (strongly aligned)/reports directly to the CEO or highest decision maker on the executive board (aligned)/does not report directly to the CEO or highest decision maker (weakly aligned). Highly significant differences (Kendall rank correlation, p ≤ 0.01, τ = 0.169).

  15. 15.

    Watson and Sreedharan (2010).

  16. 16.

    PRCA (2014).

  17. 17.

    Pozin (2014), p. 1.

  18. 18.

    Pieczka (2002), pp. 321–322.

  19. 19.

    Zerfass et al. (2008), pp. 61–62.

  20. 20.

    Zerfass et al. (2014), pp. 60–71.

  21. 21.

    Valentini (2010), p. 156.

  22. 22.

    Zerfass et al. (2014), pp. 63–71.

  23. 23.

    Giddens (1991).

  24. 24.

    For example, see Lee and Jeong (2014).

  25. 25.

    Verhoeven and Aarts (2010), n.p.

  26. 26.

    Zerfass et al. (2015), pp. 82–95.

  27. 27.

    Zerfass et al. (2015), p. 89. n = 1,277 communication professionals working in communication departments and n = 652 communication professionals working in agencies and consultancies. Q: Why does your organisation work with agencies, freelancers and communication consultants? Q: Why does your average client work with agencies, freelancers and communication consultants? Scale 1 (not important at all) – 5 (very important). Mean values. ** Highly significant differences (one-sample t-test, p ≤ 0.01). * Significant differences (one-sample t-test, p ≤ 0.05).

References

  • Arthur W. Page Society (2008). The Authentic Enterprise. New York: Arthur W. Page Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and Self-Identity. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, A. (2011). The state of the public relations profession in the UK: A review of the first decade of the twenty-first century. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 16(2), 89–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, C., & Ottestig, A. T. (2011). Communication executives in a changing world: Legitimacy beyond organizational borders. Journal of Communication Management, 15(2), 144–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. S., & Jeong, B. (2014). Having mentors and campus social networks moderates the impact of worries and video gaming on depressive symptoms: A moderated mediation analysis. BMC Public Health, 14(1), 426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macnamara, J., Lwin, M. O., Adi, A., & Zerfass, A. (2015). Asia-Pacific Communication Monitor 2015/16. The State of Strategic Communication and Public Relations in a Region of Rapid Growth. Survey Results From 23 Countries. Hong Kong: APACD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, A., Molleda, J. C., Athaydes, A., & Suárez, A. M. (2015). Latin American Communication Monitor 2015. Excelencia en comunicación estratégica, trabajo en la era digital, social media y profesionalización. Resultados de una encuesta en 18 países. Brussels: EUPRERA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nothhaft, H. (2010). Communication management as a second order management function. Roles and function of the communicative executive: Results from a shadowing study. Journal of Communication Management, 14(2), 127–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pieczka, M. (2002). Public relations expertise deconstructed. Media Culture and Society, 24(3), 301–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pozin, I. (2014). 5 measurements for PR ROI. Forbes.com. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/ilyapozin/2014/05/29/5-measurements-for-pr-roi/#4c78d54b1ca2.

  • PRCA Public Relations Consultants Association (2014). In House Benchmark Report 2014. London: PRCA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentini, C. (2010). Personalised networks of influence in public relations. Journal of Communication Management, 14(2), 153–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhoeven, P., & Aarts, N. (2010). How European public relations men and women perceive the impact of their professional activities. PRism, 7(4), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, T., & Sreedharan, C. (2010). The senior communicator of the future – competencies and training needs. In M. D. Dodd & K. Yamamura (Eds.), Ethical Issues for Public Relations Practice in a Multicultural World, 13th International Public Relations Research Conference (pp. 889–897). Gainesville, FL: Institute for Public Relations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerfass, A., Moreno, A., Tench, R., Verčič, D., & Verhoeven, P. (2008). European Communication Monitor 2008. Trends in Communication Management and Public Relations – Results and Implications. Brussels, Leipzig: University of Leipzig/EUPRERA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerfass, A., Tench, R., Verčič, D., Verhoeven, P., & Moreno, A. (2014). European Communication Monitor 2014. Excellence in Strategic Communication – Key Issues, Leadership, Gender and Mobile Media. Results of a Survey in 42 Countries. Brussels: EACD/EUPRERA, Helios Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerfass, A., Verčič, D., Verhoeven, P., Moreno, A., & Tench, R. (2015). European Communication Monitor 2015. Creating Communication Value Through Listening, Messaging and Measurement. Results of a Survey in 41 Countries. Brussels: EACD/EUPRERA, Helios Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerfass, A., Verhoeven, P., Moreno, A., Tench, R., & Verčič, D. (2016). European Communication Monitor 2016. Exploring Trends in Big Data, Stakeholder Engagement and Strategic Communication. Results of a Survey in 43 Countries. Brussels: EACD/EUPRERA, Quadriga Media Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerfass, A., & Viertmann, C. (2016). Multiple voices in corporations and the challenge for strategic communication. In K. Alm, M. Brown, & S. Royseng (Eds.), Kommunkasjon og ytringsfrihet i organsasjoner (pp. 44–63). Oslo: Cappelen Damm.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tench, R., Verčič, D., Zerfass, A., Moreno, Á., Verhoeven, P. (2017). Commandment 8. In: Communication Excellence. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48860-8_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics