Skip to main content

Corporate Social Responsibility and Culture

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

In this chapter, the aim is to underline important issues and consequences when considering the concept of social responsibility for a business. Most of the questions and issues involving corporate social responsibility are complex problems that include dilemmas with contradictory aspects. Thus, corporate social responsibility requires deep changes in the way of doing business in order to integrate an ethical and socially responsible dimension at the level of management and employees and at all levels of responsibilities whether internal or external. It requires a change of culture. Culture provides the distinctive edge (Goldman and Rojot, Negotiation. Kluwer Law International, 2003).When talking about culture, we talk of at least three levels: national, occupational and organizational. The focus here is specifically on the level of the organization, often the enterprise. There are several problems such as cultural differences, cultural changes over time and others which are mainly related to the concept of culture. One way of handling these multiple problems would be to adopt a different view of culture, considering it as shared limitations on rationality (Rojot, The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Decision Making. Oxford University Press, 2008; Chanut and Rojot, Comportement organisationnel. Tome III De Boek, 2009).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Bibliography

  • Adler, N., & Jelinek, M. (1994). Is organization culture culture bound. In G. Weaver (Ed.), Culture and conflict: Readings in intercultural relations, University Press of Mississippi, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boudon, R. (1976). La logique du social. Paris: Hachette.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chanut, V., & Rojot, J. (2009). Culture et organisation. In J. Rojot, P. Roussel, & C. Vanderberghe (Eds.), Comportement organisationnel. Tome III, De Boek.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities. (2001). Green paper promoting a European framework for corporate social responsibility. DOC/01/9. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyle-Shapiro, J., & Parzefall, M. (2008). Psychological contracts. In C. L. Cooper & J. Barling (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational behavior. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crozier, M. (1963). Le phénomène bureaucratique. Paris: Le Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crozier, M. (1978). Attitudes of French managers regarding the administration of their firms. International Studies of Organization and Management, VIII(3), 39–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crozier, M., & Freiberg, E. (1977). L’acteur et le système. Paris: Editions du Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garriga, E., & Melé, N. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53, 51–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1976). New rules of the sociological method. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, A., & Rojot, J. (2003). Negotiation. Kluwer Law International. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, K. (1983). Native views paradigms. Multiple cultures and culture conflicts in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(3), 359–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. T. (1959). The silent language. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. T. (1969). The hidden dimension. Man’s Use of space in public and private. London: Bodley-Head.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. T. (1976). Beyond culture. Garden City: Anchor Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, R. (1965). Perception of the external world. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. H. (1980). Culture’s consequences. International differences in work related values. Beverley Hills: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. H. (1991). Cultures and organizations. Software of the mind. New York: Mc Graw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Institut de l’Entreprise. (2002). L’entreprise et les Cadres. Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, G. (1988). Rethinking incrementalism. Strategic Management Journal, 9(1), 75–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kluckholn, F. R., & Strodtbeck, F. L. (1961). Variations in value orientations. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederach, J. (1995). Preparing for peace. Conflict transformation across cultures. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynn Meek, V. (1988). Organizational culture. Origins and weaknesses. Organization Studies, 9(4), 453–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maurice, M., Sellier, F., & Silvestre, J. J. (1982). Politique d’Education et Organisation Industrielle en France et en Allemagne. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1979). The structuring of organizations. New York: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin, E. (2001). Le monde comme notion sociologique. In Daniel Mercure (dir.), Une société-monde? Les dynamiques sociales de la mondialisation. Presses de l’Université Laval, Quebec, De Boeck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rojot, J. (1988). Droits collectifs et droits individuels, les situations françaises, américaines et anglaises dans. In R. Blouin & e. al (Eds.), La Charte des droits et les Relations Industrielles. Laval, Québec: Les Presses de l’Université.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rojot, J. (1994). Introduction in employee rights and industrial justice. Bulletin of Comparative Industrial Relations. No. 28. Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rojot, J. (2008). Culture and decision making. In G. P. Hodgkinson & W. H. Starbuck (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of organizational decision making. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sainsaulieu, R. (1977). L’identité au travail. Paris: Presses de la Fondation Nationale des Sciences Politiques.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sainsaulieu, R. (1982). Les relations de travail à l’usine. Paris: Les Editions d’Organisation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, S. C. (1985, July). Strategy formulation. The impact of national culture. The case of France (Working Papers No. 48). New York: Pace University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, S., & Barsoux, J. (1997). Managing across cultures. 2nd Ed, Prentice Hall, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1947). Administrative behaviour (2nd ed.). New York: The Free Press orig. 1947.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smircich, L. (1983). Concepts of culture and organizational analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(3), 339–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trepo, G. (1975, Mars). Mise en place d’une D.P.O. Le rôle crucial de la direction. Direction et Gestion, 1, and Participation: Un douloureux constat d’échec. Entreprise, No. 1020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trompenaars, F., & Hampden Turner, C. (1997). Riding the waves of culture. Understanding the cultural diversity in business. London: Nicholas Brearley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rojot, J. (2017). Corporate Social Responsibility and Culture. In: Azoury, N. (eds) Business and Society in the Middle East. Palgrave Studies in Governance, Leadership and Responsibility. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48857-8_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics