Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Imaging Findings After Surgery

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Breast Cancer

Abstract

Breast cancer treatment has markedly improved in the last few decades. Radical mastectomy was initially considered the treatment of choice despite its associated morbidity. However, less aggressive surgeries such as modified radical mastectomy, simple mastectomy, skin-sparing mastectomy, and breast-conserving surgery have increasingly replaced radical mastectomy. Moreover, reconstructive surgeries such as oncoplastic surgery have entered the surgical scene, combining a safe oncological treatment approach with desirable aesthetic outcomes. Many women being treated for breast cancer have also undergone breast-enhancing procedures using exogenous material that are either heterologous or autologous. These procedures can be performed for purely aesthetic reasons or for reconstructive purposes in cases of breast cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Suggested Readings

  1. Neal CH, Yilmaz ZN, Noroozian M et al (2013) Imaging of breast cancer-related changes after surgical therapy. AJR 202:262–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sabel MS, Pierce LJ (2016) Breast conserving therapy. UpToDate. http://www.uptodate.com/contents/breast-conserving-therapy

  3. Hayes MK, Gold RH, Bassett LW (1993) Mammographic findings after the removal of breast implants. Am J Roentgenol 160(3):487–490

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Danikas D, Theodorou SJ, Kokkalis G, Vasiou K, Kyriakopoulou K (2001) Mammographic findings following reduction mammoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 25(4):283–285

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Muir TM, Tresham J, Fritschi L, Wylie E (2010) Screening for breast cancer post reduction mammoplasty. Clin Radiol 65(3):198–205

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Roberts JM, Clark CJ, Campbell MJ, Paige KT (2011) Incidence of abnormal mammograms after reduction mammoplasty: implications for oncoplastic closure. Am J Surg 201(5):611–614

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee JH, Kim EK, Oh JY, Kwon HC, Kim SH, Kim DC et al (2013) US screening for detection of nonpalpable locoregional recurrence after mastectomy. Eur J Radiol 82(3):485–489

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mitnick JS, Roses DF, Harris MN, Colen SR (1990) Calcifications of the breast after reduction mammoplasty. Surg Gynecol 171(5):409–412

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Miller JA, Festa S, Goldstein M (1998) Benign fat necrosis simulating bilateral breast malignancy after reduction mammoplasty. South Med J 91(8):765–767

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, Mendelson EB, Lehrer D, Bohm-Velez M et al (2008) Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. JAMA 299(18):2151–2163

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Corsetti V, Houssami N, Ferrari A, Ghirardi M, Bellarosa S, Angelini O et al (2008) Breast screening with ultrasound in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: evidence on incremental cancer detection and false positives, and associated cost. Eur J Cancer 44(4):539–544

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wo J, Taghian A (2007) Radiotherapy in setting of collagen vascular disease. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 69:1347

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Boostrom SY, Throckmorton AD, Boughey JC et al (2009) Incidence of clinically significant seroma after breast and axillary surgery. J Am Coll Surg 208:148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mertz KR, Baddour LM, Bell JL, Gwin JL (1998) Breast cellulitis following breast conservation therapy: a novel complication of medical progress. Clin Infect Dis 26:481

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Keidan RD, Hoffman JP, Weese JL et al (1990) Delayed breast abscesses after lumpectomy and radiation therapy. Am Surg 56:440

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chankasul T, Lai KC, Slanetz PJ (2012) The postconservation breast: part I, expected imaging findings. AJR 198:321–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mendelson EB (1992) Evaluation of the postoperative breast. Radiol Clin North Am 30:107–138

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Peters ME, Fagerholm MI, Scanlan KA, Voegeli DR, Kelcz F (1988) Mammographic evaluation of the postsurgical and irradiated breast. RadioGraphics 8:873–899

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Libshitz HI, Montague ED, Paulus DD (1978) Skin thickness in the therapeutically irradiated breast. AJR 130:345–347

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bassett LW, Gold RH, Mirra JM (1982) Nonneoplastic breast calcifications in lipid cysts: development after excision and primary irradiation. AJR 138:335–338

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Buckley JH, Roebuck EJ (1986) Mammographic changes following radiotherapy. Br J Radiol 59:337–344

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Evers K, Troupin RH (1991) Lipid cyst: classical and atypical appearances. AJR 157:271–273

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Orson LW, Cigtay OS (1983) Fat necrosis of the breast: characteristic xeromammographic appearance. Radiology 146:35–38

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wynn GR, Bentley PG, Liebmann R, Fletcher CD (2004) Mammary parenchymal angiosarcoma after breast- conserving treatment for invasive high-grade ductal carcinoma. Breast J 10:558–559

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Catena F, Santini D, Di Saverio S et al (2006) Skin angiosarcoma arising in an irradiated breast: case- report and literature review. Dermatol Surg 32:447–455

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Chankasul T, Lai KC, Slanetz PJ (2012) The postconservation breast: part 2, imaging findings of tumor recurrence and other long-term sequelae. AJR 198:331–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Soderstrom CE, Harms SE, Farrell RS Jr, Pruneda JM, Flaming DP (1997) Detection with MR imaging of residual tumor in the breast soon after surgery. AJR 168:485–488

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Schnitt SJ, Connolly JL, Recht A et al (1985) Breast relapse following primary radiation therapy for early breast cancer. II. Detection, pathologic features and prognostic significance. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 11:1277–1284

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Recht A, Silen W, Schnitt SJ et al (1988) Time-course of local recurrence following conservative surgery and radiation therapy for early stage breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 15:255–261

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Dershaw DD, McCormick B, Cox L, Osborne MP (1990) Differentiation of benign and malignant local tumor recurrence after lumpectomy. AJR 155:35–38

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Dershaw DD, McCormick B, Osborne MP (1992) Detection of local recurrence after conservative therapy for breast carcinoma. Cancer 70:493–496

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Stomper PC, Recht A, Berenberg AL, Jochelson MS, Harris JR (1987) Mammographic detection of recurrent cancer in the irradiated breast. AJR 148:39–43

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hassell PR, Olivotto IA, Mueller HA, Kingston GW, Basco VE (1990) Early breast cancer: detection of recurrence after conservation surgery and radiation therapy. Radiology 176:731–735

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Orel SG, Troupin RH, Patterson EA, Fowble BL (1992) Breast cancer recurrence after lumpectomy and irradiation: role of mammography in detection. Radiology 183:201–206

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Belli P, Pastore G, Romani M, Terribile D, Canadè A, Costantini M (2002) Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of recurrence after breast conserving therapy. Rays 27:241–257

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Preda L, Villa G, Rizzo S et al (2006) Magnetic resonance mammography in the evaluation of recurrence at the prior lumpectomy site after conservative surgery and radiotherapy. Breast Cancer Res 8:R53

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Hirsch A, Sabel MS, Hayes DF (2016) Management of locoregional recurrence of breast cancer after mastectomy: UpToDate. http://www.uptodate.com/contents/management-of-locoregional-recurrence-of-breast-cancer-after-mastectomy

  38. Yilmaz MH, Esen G, Ayarcan Y et al (2007) The role of US and MR imaging in detecting local chest wall tumor recurrence after mastectomy. Diagn Interv Radiol 13(1):13–18

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Nahabedian M (2016) Overview of breast reconstruction. UpToDate. http://www.uptodate.com/contents/overview-of-breast-reconstruction

  40. Berg WA, Caskey CI, Hamper UM et al (1993) Diagnosing breast implant rupture with MR imaging, US, and mammography. Radiographics 13(6):1323–1336

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Juanpere S, Perez E, Huc O et al (2011) Imaging of breast implants-a pictorial review. Insights Imaging 2(6):653–670

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Middleton MS, Mcnamara MP (2000) Breast implant classification with MR imaging correlation: (CME available on RSNA link). Radiographics 20(3):E1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. DellaCroce FJ, Wolfe ET (2013) Breast reconstruction. Surg Clin N Am 93:445–453

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Caskey CI, Berg WA, Hamper UM et al (1999) Imaging spectrum of extracapsular silicone: correlation of US, MR imaging, mammographic, and histopathologic findings. Radiographics 19(suppl_1):S39–S51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Venkataraman S, Hines N, Slanetz PJ (2011) Challenges in mammography: part 2, multimodality review of breast augmentation-imaging findings and complications. Am J Roentgenol 197(6):W1031–W1045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Leibman AJ, Misra M (2011) Spectrum of imaging findings in the silicone-injected breast. Plast Reconstr Surg 1 28(1):28e–29e

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Eklund GW, Busby RC, Miller SH et al (1988) Improved imaging of the augmented breast. Am J Roentgenol 151:469–473

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. O’Toole M, Caskey CI (2000) Imaging spectrum of breast implant complications: mammography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 21:351–361

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Reynolds HE, Buckwalter KA, Jackson VP et al (1994) Comparison of mammography, sonograhy, and magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of silicone-gel breast implant rupture. Ann Plast Surg 33:247–255

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Rosculet KA, Ikeda DM, Forrest ME et al (1992) Ruptured gel-filled silicone breast implants: sonographic findings in 19 cases. AJR 159:711–716

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Pateau AA, McLaughlin SA, McNeil RB et al (2010) Capsular contracture and possible implant rupture: is magnetic resonance imaging useful. Plastic Reconstruct Surg 125:830–835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Di Benedetto G, Cecchini S, Grassetti L et al (2008) Comparative study of breast implant rupture using mammography, sonography and magnetic resonance imaging: correlation with surgical findings. Breast J 14:532–537

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Scaranelo AM, Marques AF, Smialowski EB, Lederman HM et al (2004) Evaluation of the rupture of silicone breast implants by mammography, ultrasonography and magnetic resonance Imaging: correlation with surgical findings. Sao Paulo Med J 122(2):41–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Youk JH, Son EJ, Kim EK et al (2009) Diagnosis of breast cancer at dynamic MRI in patients with breast augmentation by paraffin or silicone injection. Clin Radiol 64:1175–1180

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Lui CY, Ho CM, Lu PP et al (2008) Evaluation of MRI findings after polyacrylamide gel injection for breast augmentation. AJR 191:677–688

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Brenner RJ (2013) Evaluation of breast silicone implants. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 21:547–560

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Yamaguchi S, Nagumo Y, Niwa K (2013) Efficacy and safety of Macrolane(™) for breast enhancement: a 12-month follow-up study in Asian women. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 47(3):191–195

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Chaput B, De Bonnecaze G, Chavoin JP, Gangloff D, Garrido I (2012) France prohibits the use of macrolane in aesthetic breast augmentation for reasons similar to criticisms of autologous fat grafting to the breast. Aesthetic Plast Surg 36(4):1000–1001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Pienaar WE, McWilliams S, Wilding LJ, Perera IT (2011) The imaging features of MACROLANE™ in breast augmentation. Clin Radiol 66(10):977–983

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Ayeni OA, Ahmed MSI, Sumner AS (2012) Acellular dermal matrices in breast surgery: tips and pearls. Clin Plastic Surg 39:177–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Margolis NE, Money C et al (2014) Update on imaging of the postsurgical breast. Radiographics 34:642–660

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Dialani V, Lai KC, Slanetz PJ (2012) MR Imaging of the reconstructed breast: What the radiologist needs to know. Insights Imaging 3(3):201–213

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Kinkel K, Hylton NM (2001) Challenges to interpretation of breast MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 13:821–829

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Chen CM, Halvorson EG, Disa HH, McCarthy C et al (2007) Immediate postoperative complications in DIEP versus free/Muscle—sparing TRAM flaps. Plastic Reconstruct Surg 120(6):1477–1482

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Ascherman JA, Seruya M, Bartsich SA (2008) Abdominal wall morbidity following unilateral and bilateral breast reconstruction with pedicled TRAM flaps: an outcomes analysis of 117 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 121:1–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Spear SL, Boehmler JH, Taylor NS, Prada C (2007) The role of the latissimus dorsi flap in reconstruction of the irradiated breast. Plast Reconstr Surg 119:1–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Tarantino I, Banic A, Fischer T (2006) Evaluation of late results in breast reconstruction by latissimus dorsi flap and prosthesis implantation. Plast Reconstr Surg 117:1387–1394

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Granzow JW, Levine JL, Chiu ES, Allen RJ (2006) Breast reconstruction using perforator flaps. J Surg Oncol 94:441–454

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Smit JM, Klein S, Werker PM (2010) An overview of methods for vascular mapping in the planning of free flaps. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 63:e674–e682

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Kroll SS (2000) Fat necrosis in free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous and deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 106:576–583

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Guerra AB, Metzinger SE, Bidros RS et al (2004) Breast reconstruction with gluteal artery perforator (GAP) flaps: a critical analysis of 142 cases. Ann Plast Surg 52:118–125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Granzow JW, Levine JL, Chiu ES, Allen RJ (2006) Breast reconstruction with gluteal artery perforator flaps. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 59:614–621

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Fansa H, Schirmer S, Warnecke IC et al (2008) The transverse myocutaneous gracilis muscle flap: a fast and reliable method for breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 122:1326–1333

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Arnez ZM, Pogorelec D, Planinsek F, Ahcan U (2004) Breast reconstruction by the free transverse gracilis (TUG) flap. Br J Plast Surg 57:20–26

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Lee JM, Georgian-Smith D, Gazelle GS et al (2008) Detecting nonpalpable recurrent breast cancer: the role of routine mammographic screening of transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap reconstructions. Radiology 248:398–405

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Missana MC, Laurent I, Barreau L et al (2007) Autologous fat transfer in reconstructive breast surgery: Indications, technique and results. EJSO 33:685–690

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Lohsiriwat V, Curigliano G, Rietjens M et al (2011) Autologous fat transplantation in patients with breast cancer: “silencing” or “fueling” cancer recurrence? Breast 20:351–357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Parikh RP, Doren EL, Mooney B et al (2012) Differentiating fat necrosis from recurrent malignancy in fat-grafted breasts: an imaging classification system to guide management. PRS J 130:761–772

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Constantini M, Cipriani A, Belli P et al (2013) Radiological findings in mammary autologous fat injections: a multi-technique evaluation. Clin Radiol 68:27–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Veber M, Tourasse C, Toussoun G et al (2011) Radiographic findings after breast augmentation by autologous fat transfer. Plastic Reconstruct Surg 127:1289–1299

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Hyakusoku H, Ogawa R, Ono S et al (2009) Complications after autologous fat injection to the breast. Plast Reconstr Surg 123:360–370. discussion 371-372

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Rubin JP, Coon D, Zuley M et al (2012) Mammographic changes after fat transfer to the breast compared with changes after breast reduction: a blinded study. Plast Reconstr Surg 129:1029–1038

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Locke MB, De Chalain TM (2008) Current practice in autologous fat transplantation: suggested clinical guidelines based on a review of recent literature. Ann Plast Surg 60:98–102

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Kim SM, Park JM (2004) Mammographic and ultrasonographic features after autogenous myocutaneous flap reconstruction mammoplasty. J Ultrasound Med 23:275–282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Kwak JY, Lee SH, Park HL et al (2004) Sonographic findings in complications of cosmetic breast augmentation with autologous fat obtained by liposuction. J Clin Ultrasound 32:299–301

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Hogge JP, Robinson RE, Magnant CM et al (1995) The mammographic spectrum of fat necrosis of the breast. RadioGraphics 15:1347–1356

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Bircoll M (2011) Clinical analyses of clustered microcalcifications after autologous fat injection for breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 128:779e. author reply e-80e

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Soo MS, Kornguth PJ, Hertzberg BS (1998) Fat necrosis in the breast: sonographic features. Radiology 206:261–269

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Kinoshita T, Yashiro N, Yoshigi J et al (2002) Fat necrosis of breast. A potential pitfall in breast MRI. Clin Imaging 26:250–253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Petit JY, Lohsiriwat V, Clough KB et al (2011) The oncologic outcome and immediate surgical complications of lipofilling in breast cancer patients: a multicenter study—Milan-Paris-Lyon experience of 646 lipofilling procedures. Plast Reconstr Surg 128:341–346

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Pierrefeu-Lagrange AC, Delay E, Guerin N et al (2006) Radiological evaluation of breasts reconstructed with lipomodeling. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 51:18–28

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Gosset J, Guerin N, Toussoun G et al (2008) Radiological evaluation after lipomodelling for correction of breast conservative treatment sequelae [In French]. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 53:178–189

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Masser MR, Di Meo L, Hobby JA (1989) Tattooing in reconstruction of the nipple and areola: a new method. Plast Reconstr Surg 84:677–681

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dr. Martina Marin Gutzke from the San Rafael Hospital, Madrid, Spain, for providing surgical images, as well as Joanne Chin from Memorial Sloan Kettering Center for providing editorial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain

    Silvia Pérez Rodrigo M.D.

  2. MD Anderson Cancer Center, Madrid, Spain

    Silvia Pérez Rodrigo M.D.

  3. Breast Imaging Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, 300 East 66th Street, New York, NY, 10065, USA

    Elizabeth A. Morris M.D., F.A.C.R

Authors
  1. Silvia Pérez Rodrigo M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Elizabeth A. Morris M.D., F.A.C.R
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Silvia Pérez Rodrigo M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. European Institutee of Oncology, Milan, Italy

    Umberto Veronesi

  2. European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy

    Aron Goldhirsch

  3. European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy

    Paolo Veronesi

  4. San Raffaele University and Research Hospital, Milano, Italy

    Oreste Davide Gentilini

  5. European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy

    Maria Cristina Leonardi

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rodrigo, S.P., Morris, E.A. (2017). Imaging Findings After Surgery. In: Veronesi, U., Goldhirsch, A., Veronesi, P., Gentilini, O., Leonardi, M. (eds) Breast Cancer. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48848-6_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48848-6_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-48846-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-48848-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation