Advertisement

Radiation Risks and Confusions

  • Helmut AbelEmail author
  • Gudrun Erzgräber
Chapter

Abstract

This report is divided in 3 parts: (1) the origin of the ‘linear no-threshold hypothesis’, (2) radiation-induced malign processes, (3) consequences of confusions. After the analysis of various Drosophila experiments (1935) the scientists Timofeeff-Ressovsky, Delbrück and Zimmer draw following conclusion: the radiation induced mutation rate is independent from the dose-rate and is directly proportional to the dose. However, for malign processes one cannot ask for the relationship between the total of primarily spontaneous defects and the total of natural radiation induced defects but only for the clearly smaller rates of critically defects for cancer induction. Confusions about radiation risks can be more dangerously than the real risk itself.

Keywords

Radiation risk DNA repair DNA structure DNA double strand breaks Irrationality 

References

  1. Bundesamt für Gesundheit (1999) Radon-Informationen zu einem strahlenden Thema 3003, 2, BernGoogle Scholar
  2. Clarke RH (1997) The ICRP protection policy. Int Zeitschrift für Kernenergie 8(9)Google Scholar
  3. Cohen BL (1995) Test of the linear-no threshold theory of radiation carcinogenesis for inhaled radon decay products. Health Phys 68(2):157–174CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Erzgräber G, Rosemann M, Abel H, Regel K (1992) DNA-structures and radiation injury. Adv Space Res 12:91–101CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Regel K (1988) DNA superstructures–the key to understanding the mechanism of action of radiation in cells. Radiobiol Radiother (Berl) 29(5):529–560 (German)Google Scholar
  6. Rosemann M (1992) Ein mikrodosimetrisches Modell zur Reparatur strahleninduzierter DNA-Doppelstrangbrüche in Säugerzellen. Dissertation, Humboldt-Universität BerlinGoogle Scholar
  7. Schüttmann W (1999) Bewertung des Lungenkrebsrisikos durch Wohnungsradon. Strahlenschutzpraxis 4 (German)Google Scholar
  8. Timofeeff-Ressovsky NW, Delbrück M, Zimmer KG (1935) Über die Natur der Genmutation und der Genstruktur. Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, Fachgr. 6, N.F. 1, Nr 13 (German)Google Scholar
  9. Trott KR, Rosemann M (2000) Molecular mechanisms of radiation carcinogenesis and the linear, non threshold dose response model of radiation risk estimation. Radiat Environ Biophys 39:79–87CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Wichmann HE, Kreienbrock L, Kreuzer M et al (1998) Lungenkrebsrisiko durch Radon in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (West). Ecomed-Verlag ISBN 3-609-51500-7Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Max Delbrück Center (MDC)Berlin-BuchGermany

Personalised recommendations