Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sequential Structure of Discourse Segments Shaped by the Interplay of Recipient Design or Salience

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Formal Models in the Study of Language

Abstract

This paper argues that speaker utterance is not just the result of recipient design. While fitting words into actual situational contexts speakers are driven not only by the intent that the hearer recognize what is meant as intended by the speaker (social), but also by individual salience that affects production subconsciously (egocentrism of speaker). The interplay of these social and individual factors shapes speaker utterance. The effect of individual salience (which is usually subconscious and uncontrolled) may result in uttering semantic units that make their own context, and occasionally may cause misunderstandings. It will be claimed and demonstrated through examples that recipient design usually requires an inductive process that is carefully planned in most cases while salience effect generally appears in the form of a deductive process that may contain repairs and adjustments. The speaker has something on his/her mind, and this intention is formulated abruptly, rather carelessly without specific planning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arbib MA, Oztop E, Zukow-Goldring P (2005) Language and the mirror system: a perception/action based approach to communicative development. Cogn Brain Behav 3:239–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach K (2005) Context ex Machina. In: Szabó Z (ed) Semantics vs pragmatics. Oxford University Press, pp 15–45

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bezuidenhout A (2004) Procedural meaning and the semantics/pragmatics interface. In: Bianchi C (ed) The Semantics/Pragmatics distinction. CSLI Publications, Stanford, pp 101–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark HH (1996) Using language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clark HH, Carlson TB (1982) Hearers and speech acts. Language 58:332–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coulson S (2000) Semantic leaps: frame-shifting and conceptual blending in meaning-construction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Croft W (2000) Explaining language change: an evolutionary approach. Longman, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Culpeper J (2009) Impoliteness: using and understanding the language of offence. ESRC project. http://www.lancs.ac.uk/fass/projects/impoliteness/

  • Durkheim E (1982) The rules of sociological method. Douglas HW (trans). Simon and Schuster. New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Elsbach KD, Barr PS, Hargadon AB (2005) Identifying situated cognition in organizations. Organ Sci 16(4):422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans V (2006) Lexical concepts, cognitive models and meaning construction. Cogn Linguist 17(4):491–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein S, Hambrick DC, Cannella B (2008) Strategic leadership: theory and research on executives, top management teams, and boards. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel H (1967) Studies in ethnomethodology. Prentice Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Giora R (1997) Understanding figurative and literal language: the graded salience hypothesis. Cogn Linguist 8(3):183–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giora R (2003) On our mind: salience context and figurative language. Oxford University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Givoni S, Giora R, Bergerbest D (2013) How speakers alert addressees to multiple meanings. J Pragmat 48(1):29–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grieser DL, Kuhl PK (1988) Maternal speech to infants in a tonal language; Support for universal prosodic features in motherese. Dev Psychol 24:14–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gumperz JJ (1982) Discourse strategies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Holler J, Stevens R (2007) The effect of common ground on how speakers use gesture and speech to represent size information. J Lang Soc Psychol 26:4–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horton WS, Keysar B (1996) When do speakers take into account common ground? Cognition 59:91–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isaacs EA, Clark HH (1987) References in conversation between experts and novices. J Exp Psychol Gen 116:26–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs N, Garnham A (2007) The role of conversational hand gestures in a narrative task. J Mem Lang 56:291–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kecskes I (2004) Lexical merging, conceptual blending and cultural crossing. Intercult Pragmat 1(1):1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kecskes I (2007) Formulaic language in English lingua franca. In: Kecskés I, Horn LR (eds) Explorations in Pragmatics: linguistic, cognitive and intercultural aspects. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin/New York, pp 191–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Kecskes I (2008) Dueling contexts: a dynamic model of meaning. J Pragmatic 40(3):385–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kecskes I (2010) The paradox of communication: a socio-cognitive approach. Pragmat Soc 1(1):50–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kecskes I (2011) Salience in language production. In: Jaszczolt K, Allan K (eds) Salience and defaults in utterance processing. De Gruyter Mouton, Berlin/New York, pp 81–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Kecskes I (2013a) Why do we say what we say the way we say it. J Pragmat 48(1):71–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kecskes I (2013b) Intercultural pragmatics. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kecskes I, Zhang F (2009) Activating, seeking and creating common ground: a socio-cognitive approach. Pragmat Cogn 17(2):331–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keysar B, Barr DJ, Horton WS (1998) The egocentric basis of language use: insights from a processing approach. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 7:46–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krauss RM, Fussell SR (1991) Perspective-taking in communication: representation of other’s knowledge in reference. Soc Cogn 9:2–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinson SC (2003) Language and mind: let’s get the issues straight! In: Gentner D, Goldin-Meadow S (eds) Language in mind: advances in the study of language and cognition. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 25–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupyan G, Spivey MJ (2010) Redundant spoken labels facilitate perception of multiple items. Atten Percept Psychophys 72(8):2236–2253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadig A, Sedivy J (2002) Evidence of perspective-taking constraints in children’s on-line reference resolution. Psychol Sci 13(4):329–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman-Norlund SE, Noordzij ML, Newman-Norlund RD, Volman IAC, de Ruiter JP, Hagoort P, Toni I (2009) Recipient design in tacit communication. Cognition 111:46–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ocasio W (1997) Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strateg Manag J 18:187–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill M, Bard KA, Linnell M, Fluck F (2005) Maternal gesture with 20-month-old infants in two contexts. Dev Sci 8(4):352–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osgood CE, Bock JK (1977) Salience and sentencing: some production principles. In: Rosenberg S (ed) Sentence production: developments in research and theory. Lawrence Erlbaum, New York, pp 89–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozyurek A (2002) Do speakers design their cospeech gesture for their addressees? The effects of addressee location on representational gestures. J Mem Lang 46:688–704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peleg O, Giora R, Fein O (2001) Salience and context effects: two are better than one. Metaphor Symb 16(3/4):173–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pomerantz A, Heritage J (2012) Preference. In: Sidnell J, Stivers T (eds) The handbook of conversational analysis. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzolatti G, Craighero L (2004) The mirror-neuron system. Annu Rev Neurosci 27:169–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sacks H (1992) Lectures on conversation, vols 1 and 2. Edited by G Jefferson with Introduction by E A Schegloff. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Starbuck WH, Milliken FJ (1988) Executive’s perceptual filters: what they notice and how they make sense. In: Hambrick DC (ed) The executive effect: concepts and methods for studying Top managers. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp 35–65

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Linguistics and Education, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, USA

    Istvan Kecskes

Authors
  1. Istvan Kecskes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Istvan Kecskes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Dept of Linguistics, University of Geneva, Genève, Geneve, Switzerland

    Joanna Blochowiak

  2. Batiment Landolt, 7th Floor, Univ of Geneva, Dept of Linguistics, Geneva, Switzerland

    Cristina Grisot

  3. Dept. of Psycholinguistics, University of Geneva Dept. of Psycholinguistics, Geneva, Switzerland

    Stephanie Durrleman

  4. Department of Linguistics, University of Geneva, Genève, Geneve, Switzerland

    Christopher Laenzlinger

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kecskes, I. (2017). Sequential Structure of Discourse Segments Shaped by the Interplay of Recipient Design or Salience. In: Blochowiak, J., Grisot, C., Durrleman, S., Laenzlinger, C. (eds) Formal Models in the Study of Language. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48832-5_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48832-5_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-48831-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-48832-5

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation