How to Keep the Story Going for Those Who Come After

Part of the Curriculum Studies Worldwide book series (CSWW)


“How to Keep the Story going for Those Who Come After,” is an experimental act of crafting an assemblage, cobbling together stories of otherworldly conversations/encounters, envisioning the production of knowledge as a process of arranging, organizing, and temporarily fitting together ideas and theories. Playfully unpacking the figuration of the salmon through its complex multiple contradictory identities, the author brings forth a deeper understanding of the entangled nature of the material and the discursive. The chapter is written diffractively in order to disrupt conventional historical forms of research narratives, instead holding together dispirit findings and presenting stories threaded through one another. Questioning the practices and processes of who, what and, why we teach, the author imagines the development of feral nomadic subjects able to hold together heteronymous ideas, beliefs, and theories in a generative society.


Diffraction Salmon Feral Citizenship Data DNA Behavioral epigenetics 


  1. Bailey, John. 1991. The Search for Signs of Inteligent Life in the Universe. Los Angeles, CA: Orion Classics.Google Scholar
  2. Barad, Karen M. 2008. “Posthuman Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter.” In Material Feminisms, edited by Stacy Alaimo and Susan J. Hekman, 120–154. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Barad, Karen M. 2010. “Quantum Entanglements and Hauntological Relations of Inheritance: Dis/continuities, SpaceTime Enfoldings, and Justice-to-Come.” Derrida Today 3(2): 240–268. doi: 10.3366/E1754850010000813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barad, Karen M. 2014. “Re-Membering the Future, Re(con)figuring the Past: Temporality, Materiality, and Justice-to-Come.” Womens Studies Duke.
  5. Blanchet, Francis Norbert Abp. 1869. Dictionary of the Chinook Jargon: To Which is Added Numerous Conversations, Thereby Enabling Any Person to Speak Chinook Correctly. Portland, OR: S.J. M’Cormick.Google Scholar
  6. Braidotti, Rosi. 2006. Transpositions: On Nomadic Ethics. Cambridge; Malden, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  7. Braidotti, Rosi. 2014. “Writing as a Nomadic Subject.” Comparative Critical Studies 11(2–3): 163–184. doi: 10.3366/ccs.2014.0122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brucker, Robert M. 2013. “Of Pop Art and Holobiont.” Live in Symbiosis, 20 April.
  9. Brucker, Robert M., and Seth R. Bordenstein. 2013. “The Hologenomic Basis of Speciation: Gut Bacteria Cause Hybrid Lethality in the Genus Nasonia.” Science 341(6146): 667–669. doi: 10.1126/science.1240659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Champagne, Frances A., and Emilie F. Rissman. 2011. “Behavioral Epigenetics: A New Frontier in the Study of Hormones and Behavior.” Hormones and Behavior 59(3): 277–278. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2011.02.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davis, Tinsley H. 2004. “Meselson and Stahl: The Art of DNA Replication.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101(52): 17895–17896. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0407540101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dawkins, Richard. 1976. The Selfish Gene. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Derrida, Jacques. 1994. Specters of Marx: The State of the Debt, the Work of Mourning, and the New International. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Fawcett, Leesa. 2009. “Feral Sociality and (un)Natural Histories: On Nomadic Ethics and Embodied Learning.” In Fields of Green: Restorying Culture, Environment, and Education, edited by Marcia McKenzie, Paul Hart, Heesoon Bai, and Bob Jickling, 227–236. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
  15. Garside, Nick. 2013. Democratic Ideals and the Politicization of Nature: The Roving Life of a Feral Citizen Environmental Politics and Theory. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gustafson, Anna. 2014. “Ghost Salmon [Website].”
  17. Hanawalt, Philip C. 2004. “Density Matters: The Semiconservative Replication of DNA.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101(52): 17889–17894. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0407539101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Haraway, Donna J. 1987. Donna Haraway Reads the National Geographics of Primates. New York, NY: Paper Tiger Television.Google Scholar
  19. Haraway, Donna J. 2004. The Haraway Reader. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Haraway, Donna J. 2008a. “Otherworldly Conversations, Terran Topics, Local Terms.” In Material Feminisms, edited by Stacy Alaimo and Susan J. Hekman, 157–187. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Haraway, Donna J. 2008b. When Species Meet. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  22. Haraway, Donna J. 2011. “SF: Science Fiction, Speculative Fabulation, String Figures, So Far.” Science Fiction Research Association, Lublin, Poland, 7 July.Google Scholar
  23. Haraway, Donna J. 2013. “Sowing Worlds: A Seed Bag for Terraforming with Earth Others.” In Beyond the Cyborg: Adventures with Donna Haraway, edited by Margret Grebowicz and Helen Merrick, 183–195. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Haraway, Donna J. 2014. “SF: String Figures, Multispecies Muddles, Staying with the Trouble.”
  25. Haraway, Donna J. 2016. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene (Experimental Futures). Durham, NC: Duke University Press Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Holmes, Frederic L. 2001. Meselson, Stahl, and the Replication of DNA: A History of “The Most Beautiful Experiment in Biology.” New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hurley, D. 2013. “Grandma’s Experience Leave a Mark On Your Genes.” Discovery Magazine. June 11. Accessed May 20, 2015.
  28. Irwin, Rita L., and Stephanie Springgay. 2008. “A/r/tography as Practice-Based Research.” In Being with A/r/tography, edited by Stephanie Springgay, Rita Irwin, Carl Leggo, and Peter Gouzouasis. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  29. Jackson, Alecia Y., and Lisa A. Mazzei. 2012. Thinking with Theory in Qualitative Research: Viewing Data Across Multiple Perspectives. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Jameson, Fredric. 1999. “Marx’s Purloined Letter.” In Ghostly Demarcations: A Symposium on Jacques Derrida’s Spectres of Marx, edited by Michael Sprinker, 26–67. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  31. Jane, Stephen F., Keith H. Nislow, and Andrew R. Whiteley. 2014. “The Use (and Misuse) of Archaeological Salmon Data to Infer Historical Abundance in North America with a Focus on New England.” Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 24(3): 943–954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Keller, Evelyn Fox. 2013. “Paradigm Shifts and Revolutions in Contemporary Biology.”
  33. Lien, M., and J. Law. 2011. “‘Emergent aliens’: On Salmon, Nature, and Their Enactment.” Ethnos 76(1): 65–87. doi:  10.1080/00141844.2010.549946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lien, Marianne. 2014. “Escapee, Homeless and Those that ‘Wander Off’: Salmon as Rubble in Norgegian Rivers.” In Anthropocene: Arts of Living on a Damaged Planet.
  35. Maracle, Lee. 1998. “Where Love Winds Itself Around Desire.” In First Fish, First People: Salmon Tales of the North Pacific Rim, edited by Judith Roche and Meg McHutchison, 160–180. Vancouver, BC: UBC Press.Google Scholar
  36. Maturana, Humberto R. 2001. “Our Genome Does Not Determine Us.” American Society for Cybernetics (ASC) 2001 Conference, Vancouver, BC, May 22.Google Scholar
  37. Mostafavi-Abdolmaleky, Hamid, Stephen J. Glatt, and Ming T. Tsuang. 2011. “Epigenetics in Psychiatry.” In Epigenetic Aspects of Chronic Diseases, edited by Helmtrud I. Roach, Felix Bronner, and Richard O. Oreffo, 163–174. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Noddings, Nel. 2003. Happiness and Education. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. OED Online. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  40. Regalado, Antonio. 2015. “U.S. to Develop DNA Study of One Million People.” MIT Technology Review. Accessed March 15, 2015.
  41. Reimchen, Tom. 2001. “Salmon Nutrient, Nitrogen Isotopes and Coastal Forests.” Ecoforestry, 13–16. Victoria, BC: Ecoforestry Institute Society.Google Scholar
  42. Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg. 1997. Toward a History of Epistemic Things: Synthesizing Proteins in the Test Tube, Writing science. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Richardson, Don. 2014. “Ghost Salmon.” The Source Forum of Diversity 14(2).Google Scholar
  44. Robbins, Tom. 1980. Still Life with Woodpecker. New York, NY: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
  45. Schrader, Astrid. 2010. “Responding to Pfiesteria piscicida (the Fish Killer): Phantomatic Ontologies, Indeterminacy, and Responsibility in Toxic Microbiology.” Social Studies of Science 40(2): 275–306. doi: 10.1177/0306312709344902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shore, Randy. 2014. “Mapping of Atlantic Salmon Genome May Help Wild Pacific Fish.” Vancouver Sun, June 9, Business.
  47. Wagner, Jane. 1986. The Search for Signs of Intelligent Life in the Universe. 1st ed. New York, NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  48. Wagner, Jane. 2012. The Search for Signs of Intelligent Life in the Universe. New York, NY: Harper Collins Publishers Inc. Original screenplay published in 1986.Google Scholar
  49. Watson, James D., Francis H. C. Crick 1953. “A Structure for Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid.” Nature 171: 737–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Weaver, Ian C. G., Nadia Cervoni, Frances A. Champagne, Ana C. D’Alessio, Shakti Sharma, Jonathan R. Seckl, Sergiy Dymov, Moshe Szyf, and Michael J. Meaney. 2004. “Epigenetic Programming by Maternal Behavior.” Nature Neuroscience 7(8): 847–854. doi: 10.1038/nn1276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wolfreys, Julian. 2002. Victorian Hauntings: Spectrality, Gothic, the Uncanny and Literature. Houndmills; New York, NY: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of CaliforniaSanta CruzUSA

Personalised recommendations