Skip to main content

The Role of Military Managers in State-Owned Companies in Argentina. Astilleros y Fábricas Navales del Estado (1953–1986)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Reassessing the Role of Management in the Golden Age

Part of the book series: Central Issues in Contemporary Economic Theory and Policy ((CICETP))

  • 357 Accesses

Abstract

Our purpose is to analyze—focusing on the profiles of the top management—the State influence in the Argentine industrialization through the creation of State-owned enterprises (SOEs) in strategic sectors, as a key factor in economic policy since the Second World War until the 1980s. The main argument is that the professionalization of the senior officers in Argentine Armed Forces influenced the creation and the trajectory of SOEs in strategic sectors. We focus on a case study, the State-owned shipyard—Astilleros y Fábricas Navales del Estado—created by the decision of the Navy in the early 1950s.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The strategic sectors are those which, by nature (effects of supply), strongly influence the economic, technological and industrial development of the country. They included energy industries (oil and gas), iron and steel, nuclear, chemical (heavy and petrochemical chemistry) and defense (shipbuilding, armaments industry, aeronautics and space industry) as well as those related to information and telecommunication technologies (Beyreuther 2011).

  2. 2.

    Between 2003 and 2015, the following companies and public services, among the most important, were restatized: mail service, radio spectrum, pension funds, railways, energy, water and sanitation, and Argentina Satelital, Aerolínes Argentina, Enarsa and YPF.

  3. 3.

    Enrique Mosconi was a civil engineer trained as a military engineer in Prussia. He was the General Director of the military arsenals from 1914 until 1918, and in 1920, he was the Director of the War Arsenal of the Army, “Esteban de Luca”. In 1922, he assumed the direction of YPF.

  4. 4.

    Manuel Nicolas Savio graduated from the Military College as Second Lieutenant in 1910. Between 1917 and 1929 he taught technical subjects at the Military College, at the Army War College and at the School of Mechanics. In 1930, he reorganized the Superior Military College and on that basis organized the EST, the Army technical college with the aim of training military engineers.

  5. 5.

    Manera E., Navy Officers’ Service Records (Box 247), Navy’s Historic Archive.

  6. 6.

    To replace the lack of cranes and presses, many materials were carried, literally, by hand or on shoulder (González Climent 1973, p. 132).

  7. 7.

    The president of the Directory Board had to be a senior officer of the Navy and also had to include at least two other members of high rank of the Navy (Decree no. 10627/1953, article 4th).

  8. 8.

    The organizational chart was established by the decree no. 16385/1959.

  9. 9.

    Antonio Marín studied at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology with a scholarship of the Argentine Navy. He graduated as a naval and mechanical engineer in 1940. Back in Argentina, he participated with Edmundo Manera in creating the Naval Engineering career at University of Buenos Aires. Marín took part in the first team of engineers of AFNE and designed the flagship of the Argentina Navy.

  10. 10.

    The most important debtors were the following public companies: Empresa Líneas Marítimas Argentinas (ELMA) YPF and Yacimientos Carboníferos Fiscales.

  11. 11.

    In the first half of the twentieth century, naval engineers studied in foreign universities. In 1943, the Navy Corps of Engineers was composed of only 18 professionals who were graduated mostly in the United States, Italy and Britain (Gonzalez Climent 1973, p. 144).

  12. 12.

    The Bachelor’s Degree in Naval Engineering had a duration of six years as other engineering at the University of Buenos Aires.

  13. 13.

    Since then Manera joined the National Committee of the Bermejo River. Subsequently, he was the president of the Professional Council of Naval Engineering, chairman of the Naval Technical Division in the Argentine Centre of Engineers and member of the Institute of Argentine Merchant Marine (Manera E., Navy Officers’ Service Records, Box 247, Navy’s Historic Archive). He designed, in 1961, the first naval experimental center that now bears his name. This tunnel of 70 meters long is currently the only laboratory in the country and the third in the region.

  14. 14.

    The shipbuilding industry differs from the mass production due to the characteristics of its products, based on projects, with a high unit cost, that is to say, manufactured by unity or in a very limited quantity, “custom-made” (Hobday 1998, 2000; Davies and Hobday 2005).

Bibliography

  • Adler E. (1987), The Power of Ideology. The Quest for Technological Autonomy in Argentina and Brazil, Berkeley, University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armada Argentina (1992), Promociones egresadas de la Escuela Naval Militar 1879–1991, Buenos Aires, Estado Mayor General de la Armada, Dirección General del personal naval.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armada Argentina (2007), «Meanual de intereses marítimos», Secretaría General Naval, Subsecretaría de Intereses Marítimos, retrieved from http://www.ara.mil.ar/pag.asp?idItem=189

  • Barragán I. (2013), Para el bien de la Nación. Gestión militar de empresas estatales, prácticas de integración y represión de la fuerza de trabajo desde la perspectiva de caso, El astillero Río Santiago 1973–1976, X Jornadas de Sociología, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Universidad de Buenos Aires.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belini C. (2006), «Reestructurando el Estado industrial: el caso de la privatización de la DINIE 1955–1962», Revista Desarrollo Económico, 46(181), Buenos Aires, Instituto de Desarrollo Económicoy Social, pp. 89–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belini C. – Rougier M. (2008), El Estado empresario en la industria argentina, Buenos Aires, Manantial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedetti G. (2015), Trayectoria de una empresa del Estado. Análisis de las capacidades tecnológicas del Astillero Río Santiago: 1953–2012, unpublished master’s thesis, Bernal, Universidad Nacional de Quilmes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berrotarán P. (2003), Del plan a la planificación. El Estado durante la época peronista, Buenos Aires, Imago Mundi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bértola L. – Ocampo J.A. (2010), Desarrollo, vaivenes y desigualdad: una historia económica de América Latina desde la independencia, Madrid, SEGIB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyreuther I. (2011), Desarrollo científico tecnológico e industrias para la defensa, mimeo, IX Jornadas de Sociología, Capitalismo del Siglo XXI, crisis y reconfiguraciones, Universidad Nacional de Buenos Aires.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boletín Centro Naval (Bcn) (1985), Necrológica, Buenos Aires.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boletín Centro Naval (Bcn) (2008), Necrológica, Buenos Aires.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boletín Estadístico del Banco Central de la Republica Argentina (1982), Buenos Aires.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calá C. – Mauro L. – Graña F. – Borello J. (2008), «La industria naval argentina: antecedentes, dinámica reciente y situación actual», Mar del Pleata, FCEyS, retrieved from http://nulan.mdp.edu.ar/1099/1/00562.pdf

  • Campione D. (2003), Prolegomenos del peronismo. Los cambios en el Estado nacional 1943–1946, Buenos Aires, Manuel Suárez Editor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carranza E. (1967), «Aspectos de la industria naval argentina», Boletín del Centro Naval, 670, enero marzo, Buenos Aires, pp. 419–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centro de Estudios Para la Producción (Cep) (2005a), La industria naval en la Argentina, Documento de trabajo, Buenos Aires, Subsecretaría de desarrollo productivo de la Secretaría de Industria de la Nación, retrieved from http//:www.industria.gov.ar/cep

    Google Scholar 

  • Centro de Estudios Para la Producción (Cep) (2005b), «La industria naval pesada en la Argentina», retrieved in http://www.cep.gov.ar/html/industrial.htm

  • Cicalesi J.C. (2011), «Capacidades productivas de los Astilleros argentinos. Tradición y modernidad», Tecnología Mielitar, Buenos Aires, TECMIL, 4, pp. 7–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comín F. – Aceña P. (eds) (1991), Historia de la empresa pública en España, Madrid, Espasa Calpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corzo R. (2010), Un sentimiento llamado Astillero, Crónicas del Astillero Río Santiago, Ensenada, Editorial Dunken.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coscia S. (1981), La industria naval pesada. Desarrollo y perspectivas del mercado argentino, Gerencia de Investigaciones Económicas, Deepartamento de Estudios Sectoriales, Buenos Aires, Banco Nacional de Desarrollo (BND).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuervo A. (1983), Bases para el diseño de un modelo organizativo de las empresas públicas: holdings empresariales o entidades públicas de dirección, Madrid, Hacienda Pública Española, pp. 195–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies A. – Hobday M. (2005), The Business of Projects: Managing Innovation in Complex Products and Systems, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans P. (1996), «El Estado como problema y solución», Revista Desarrollo Económico, 140(3), Buenos Aires, Instituto de Desarrollo Económico y Social, pp. 529–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felisini D. (2014), «Between State and Market. Managerial Capitalism Italian Style: IRI, 1933–1970», Revista de Historia industrial, Economía y Empresa, 54, pp. 81–107, retrieved from http://www.publicacions.ub.edu/refs/indices/07988.pdf

  • Frassa J. (2009), Evitando el naufragio de la privatización. Estrategias laborales y empresariales en la industria naval frente a la transformación del contexto socio-económico. El caso del Astillero Río Santiago en los años 90, unpublished Doctoral Thesis, Buenos Aires, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Universidad de Buenos Aires.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman W. (1974), Public and Pirvate Enterprises in Mixed Economies, New York, Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fundación de Investigaciones Económicas Latinoamericanas (Fiel) (1976), Las empresas públicas en la economía argentina, Buenos Aires, Consejo Empresario Argentino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fundación de Investigación Para el Desarrollo (1981), Estudios especiales: la industria naval en la Argentina, Buenos Aires, FIDE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadano N. (2006), Historia del petróleo en Argentina 1907–1955, Buenos Aires, Ed. Edhasa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerschenkron A. (1968), El atraso económico en perspectiva histórica, Madrid, Alianza Editorial.

    Google Scholar 

  • González Climent A. (1973), Historia de la industria naval argentina, Ensenada, Imprenta AFNE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobday M. (1998), «Product Complexity, Innovation and Industrial Organization», Research Policy, pp. 689–710.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobday M. (2000), «The Project-Based Organization: An Ideal Form for Managing Complex Products and Systems?», Research Policy, pp. 871–893.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz J. (1984), «Domestic Technological Innovations and Dynamic Comparative Advantage. Further Reflections on a Comparative Case-Study Program», Journal of Development Economics, 16, North-Holland, pp. 13–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lall S. (1992), «Technological Capabilities and Industrialization», World Development, 20(2), Great Britain, pp. 165–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • López E. (1988), «La industria militar argentina», Nueva Sociedad, 97, septiembre-octubre, Caracas, pp. 168–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manera E. (1963), La importancia de los canales del rio Bermejo en el sistema nacional de transporte, Buenos Aires, Biblioteca Cumbre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manera E. (1968), «Aspectos económicos de la industria naval», in Morell F. (comp.), Intereses marítimos argentinos, Buenos Aires, Centro Naval, Instituto de Publicaciones Navales, pp. 232–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauro L.M. (2011), La industria naval como un sector estratégico: análisis del rol del Estado, mimeo, Instituto de Investigaciones Gino Germani, Universidad de Buenos Aires.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millward R. – Parker D.M. (1983), «Public and Private Enterprise: Comparative Behaviour and Relative Efficiency», in Millward R. – Parker D.M. – Rosenthal L. – Summer M.T. – Topman N. (eds) (1983), Public Sector Economies, London, Longman, pp. 199–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I. – Von Krogh G. – Voelpel S. (2006), «Organizational Knowledge Creation Theory: Evolutionary Paths and Future Advances», Review Paper, Doi, 10.1177/ 0170840606066312, Organization Studies, August, 27(8), pp. 1179–1208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noticias y Comentarios (1979), Revista Astilleros y Fábricas Navales del Estado S.A., 1, Ensenada, AFNE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panaia M. – Lesser R. – Skupch P. (1973), Estudios sobre los orígenes del peronismo, Buenos Aires, Siglo XXI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pontoriero G. (2013), «Fuerzas Armadas y desarrollo energético en la Argentina: el papel de la Marina de Guerra en la primera mitad del siglo XX», H-industri@ Revista de Historia de la Industria, los Servicios y las Empresas en América Latina, 10, Universidad de Buenos Aires, pp. 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinert E. (2000), «The Role of the State in Economic Growth», in Toninelli P.A. (ed.), The Rise and Fall of State-Owned Enterprise in the Western World, Cambridge University Press, pp. 73–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez J.O. (1981), Industria Naval Pesada, Documento realizado para Banco Nacional de Desarrollo, Buenos Aires, Gerencia de Investigaciones Económicas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ocaña C. – Salas V. (1983), «La teoría de la agencia: aplicación a las empresas públicas españolas», Cuadernos Económicos, 22–23, Madrid, ICE, pp. 157–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rougier M. (2015), «El complejo militar industrial, “núcleo duro” del Estado empresario y la industrialización en la Argentina», in Regalsky A. – Rougier M. (eds), Los derroteros del Estado empresario en la argentina siglo XX, Buenos Aires, Editorial de la Universidad Nacional de Tres de Febrero.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouquié A. (1981), Poder militar y sociedad política en la Argentina, Buenos Aires, Hyspamérica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russo C. (2013), «Astilleros estatales e industria naval argentina: trayectoria reciente y desafíos futuros», Revista de Gestión Pública, vol. II, Santiago de Chile, Centro de estudios de la Gestión Pública, pp. 215–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandoval D. – Jaramillo L. (1986), «Caso n. 7. Un astillero colombiano», in Katz J. (comp.), Desarrollo y crisis de la capacidad tecnológica latinoamericana. El caso de la industria metalmecánica. Estudios Sobre Desarrollo Económico, Buenos Aires, BID/ CEPAL/CIID/PNUD, pp. 207–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savio M. (1942), «Política de la producción metalúrgica argentina», Revista Militar del Circulo Militar, Buenos Aires, Instituto de Estudios y Conferencias Industriales, pp. 363–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savio M. (1972a), Movilización Industrial. En Obras del General Manuel Savio, Buenos Aires, Imprenta SOMISA, (originally published in 1942).

    Google Scholar 

  • Savio M. (1972b), «Discurso Cuarto aniversario de la creación de la Dirección General de Fabricaciones Militares», En Obras del General Manuel Savio, Buenos Aires, Imprenta SOMISA, (originally published in 1945).

    Google Scholar 

  • Toninelli P.A. (ed.) (2000), The Rise and Fall of State-Owned Enterprise in the Western World, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ugalde A. (1983), «Las empresas públicas en Argentina: Su Magnitud y Origen», Documento de Trabajo, 3, Buenos Aires, Comisión Económica para América Latina, CEPAL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernon R. – Aharoni Y. (1981), State-Owned Enterprise in the Western Economics, London, Groom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

Sources

  • Afne’s Anual Reports and Balances sheets (1959–1988). Afnes Standard Cost Manual (1959, 1969, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • Argentine Navy’s, Historical Archives-Navy Officers’ Service Records.

    Google Scholar 

Laws and Decrees

  • Decree Law no. 10627/1953, creating naval shipyard and State factories, Boletín Oficial (Official Gazette), no. 17423, June 23, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  • Decree Law no. 15349/1946, legal system legal for joint ventures, Boletín Oficial (Official Bulletin) 25 June 6, 1946.

    Google Scholar 

  • Decree Law no. 16385, Boletin Oficial (Official Gazette), August 29, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law no. 13653/1949, State companies, Boletín Oficial (Official Gazette), October 31, 1949. Law no. 14184, Second Five-Year Plan, Boletín Oficial (Official Gazette), January 30, 1953, retrieved from http://www.boletinoficial.gov.ar/DisplayPdf.aspx?s=01&f=19530130

  • Law no. 17318/1967, Corporations with State majority ownership, Boletín Oficial (Official Bulletin) Jun 27, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

Interviews

  • Benedetti G., AFNE’s counter (1972–2012), interviewed on April 26, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casarico J., Teacher at the Escuela Técnica Astilleros Rio Santiago (ETARS) interviewed on July 15, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahler I., Industrialist, President of the Unión Industrial Argentina (1991–1993), interviewed on April 25, May 27, June 25, 2010, March 19, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mospán N., Naval engineer, interviewed on March 5, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pietranera J., Naval engineer, AFNE’s former President (1986–1988), interviewed on July 25, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podetti R., Naval engineer, Directory Board member of the Federación de la Industria Naval Argentina (FINA), interviewed on November 24, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poire A., AFNE’s technical naval electrician (1973–1978), interviewed January 10, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potash, R. El ejercito y la política en la Argentina 1928–1945. Buenos Aires. Sudamericana. 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld C., Naval technician, naval supplier, interviewed on July 25, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yacobits D., Employee management Department, Astilleros Rio Santiago, interviewed on July 15, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

Table 1 Argentina, SOEs/GDP (1950–1975) (%)
Table 2 AFNE, employment
Table 3 Major naval productions, AFNE 1953–2012
Table 4 AFNE, productive diversification (%/total turnover)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Russo, C. (2017). The Role of Military Managers in State-Owned Companies in Argentina. Astilleros y Fábricas Navales del Estado (1953–1986). In: Felisini, D. (eds) Reassessing the Role of Management in the Golden Age. Central Issues in Contemporary Economic Theory and Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48722-9_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48722-9_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-48721-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-48722-9

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics