Abstract
Humans and many other animals, such as songbirds, communicate acoustically in large, dense social groups. In such environments, the signals produced by different signalers commonly overlap in time and frequency, and background noise can be intense. How can receivers make sense of the acoustic scene when there is so much noise and acoustic clutter? The answer is that vocal communication in such environments engages a suite of perceptual and cognitive mechanisms responsible for parsing the acoustic scene into perceptually discrete auditory “objects” or “streams” of behavioral relevance. In this chapter, I review psychophysical and neurophysiological studies of European starlings ( Sturnus vulgaris , Sturnidae ) that have aimed to identify mechanisms underlying the perceptual organization of complex acoustic scenes. The focus of this review is on recent efforts to discover neural mechanisms for auditory scene analysis (ASA) that promote signal detection (e.g., comodulation masking release and the comodulation detection difference), signal recognition (e.g., perceptual restoration), and signal segregation (e.g., auditory streaming ) under adverse listening conditions. The chapter emphasizes that key insights into the neural codes for ASA are to be gained by integrating neurophysiological approaches with objective measures of psychophysical performance in animal models for which receiving communication signals in a crowd is a key feature of their biology.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adret-Hausberger M, Jenkins PF (1988) Complex organization of the warbling song in the European starling Sturnus vulgaris. Behavior 107:138–156. doi:10.1163/156853988X00322
Asari H, Zador AM (2009) Long-lasting context dependence constrains neural encoding models in rodent auditory cortex. J Neurophysiol 102:2638–2656. doi:10.1152/jn.00577.2009
Baugh AT, Ryan MJ, Bernal XE, Rand AS, Bee MA (2016) Female túngara frogs do not experience the continuity illusion. Behav Neurosci 130:62–74. doi:10.1037/bne0000115
Bee MA (2012) Sound source perception in anuran amphibians. Curr Op Neurobiol 22:301–310. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2011.12.014
Bee MA (2015) Treefrogs as animal models for research on auditory scene analysis and the cocktail party problem. Int J Psychophysiol 95:216–237. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2014.01.004
Bee MA, Klump GM (2004) Primitive auditory stream segregation: a neurophysiological study in the songbird forebrain. J Neurophysiol 92:1088–1104. doi:10.1152/jn.00884.200
Bee MA, Klump GM (2005) Auditory stream segregation in the songbird forebrain: effects of time intervals on responses to interleaved tone sequences. Brain Behav Evol 66:197–214. doi:10.1159/000087854
Bee MA, Micheyl C (2008) The “cocktail party problem”: what is it? How can it be solved? And why should animal behaviorists study it? J Comp Psychol 122:235–251. doi:10.1037/0735-7036.122.3.235
Bee MA, Buschermöhle M, Klump GM (2007) Detecting modulated signals in modulated noise: (II) neural thresholds in the songbird forebrain. Eur J Neurosci 26:1979–1994. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05805.x
Bee MA, Micheyl C, Oxenham AJ, Klump GM (2010) Neural adaptation to tone sequences in the songbird forebrain: patterns, determinants, and relation to the build-up of auditory streaming. J Comp Physiol A 196:543–557. doi:10.1007/s00359-010-0542-4
Bigalke-Kunz B, Rübsamen R, Dörrscheidt GJ (1987) Tonotopic organization and functional characterization of the auditory thalamus in a songbird, the European starling. J Comp Physiol A 161:255–265. doi:10.1007/BF00615245
Borrill SJ, Moore BC (2002) Evidence that comodulation detection differences depend on within-channel mechanisms. J Acoust Soc Am 111:309–319. doi:10.1121/1.1426373
Braaten RF, Leary JC (1999) Temporal induction of missing birdsong segments in European Starling. Psychol Sci 10:162–166. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00125
Bregman AS (1978) Auditory streaming is cumulative. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 4:380–387. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.4.3.380
Bregman AS (1990) Auditory scene analysis. MIT Press, Cambridge
Bregman MR, Patel AD, Gentner TQ (2016) Songbirds use spectral shape, not pitch, for sound pattern recognition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113:1666–1671. doi:10.1073/pnas.1515380113
Buschermöhle M, Verhey JL, Feudel U, Freund JA (2007) The role of the auditory periphery in comodulation detection difference and comodulation masking release. Biol Cybern 97:397–411. doi:10.1007/s00422-007-0179-8
Carr CE, Code RA (2000) The central auditory system of reptiles and birds. In: Dooling RJ, Fay RR, Popper AN (eds) Comparative hearing: birds and reptiles. Springer, New York, pp. 197–248
Chaiken M, Böhner J, Marler P (1993) Song acquisition in European starlings, Sturnus vulgaris: a comparison of the songs of live-tutored, tape-tutored, untutored, and wild-caught males. Anim Behav 46:1079–1090. doi:10.1006/anbe.1993.1298
Chaiken M, Böhner J, Marler P (1994) Repertoire turnover and the timing of song acquisition in European starlings. Behaviour 128:25–39. doi:10.1163/156853994X00037
Comins JA, Gentner TQ (2014) Temporal pattern processing in songbirds. Curr Opin Neurobiol 28:179–187. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2014.08.003
Denham SL, Winkler I (2006) The role of predictive models in the formation of auditory streams. J Physiol Paris 100:154–170. doi:10.1016/j.jphysparis.2006.09.012
Dolležal L-V, Itatani N, Günther S, Klump GM (2012) Auditory streaming by phase relations between components of harmonic complexes: a comparative study of human subjects and bird forebrain neurons. Behav Neurosci 126:797–808. doi:10.1037/a0030249
Dolležal L-V, Brechmann A, Klump GM, Deike S (2014) Evaluating auditory stream segregation of SAM tone sequences by subjective and objective psychoacoustical tasks, and brain activity. Front Neurosci 8:119. doi:10.3389/fnins.2014.00119
Dykstra AR, Halgren E, Thesen T, Carlson CE, Doyle W, Madsen JR, Eskandar EN, Cash SS (2011) Widespread brain areas engaged during a classical auditory streaming task revealed by intracranial EEG. Front Hum Neurosci 5:74. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2011.00074
Eens M, Pinxten R, Verheyen RF (1989) Temporal and sequential organization of song bouts in the starling. Ardea 77:75–86
Eens M, Pinxten R, Verheyen RF (1991) Male song as a cue for mate choice in the European starling. Behaviour 116:210–238. doi:10.1163/156853991X00049
Eens M, Pinxten R, Verheyen RF (1992a) Song learning in captive European starlings, Sturnus vulgaris. Anim Behav 44:1131–1143. doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80325-2
Eens M, Pinxten R, Verheyen RF (1992b) No overlap in song repertoire size between yearling and older starlings Sturnus vulgaris. Ibis 134:72–76. doi:10.1111/j.1474-919X.1992.tb07233.x
Elhilali M, Ma L, Micheyl C, Oxenham AJ, Shamma SA (2009) Temporal coherence in the perceptual organization and cortical representation of auditory scenes. Neuron 61:317–329. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.12.005
Ficken RS, Ficken MS, Hailman JP (1974) Temporal pattern shifts to avoid acoustic interference in singing birds. Science 183:762–763. doi:10.1126/science.183.4126.762
Fishman YI, Reser DH, Arezzo JC, Steinschneider M (2001) Neural correlates of auditory stream segregation in primary auditory cortex of the awake monkey. Hear Res 151:167–187. doi:10.1016/S0378-5955(00)00224-0
Fishman YI, Arezzo JC, Steinschneider M (2004) Auditory stream segregation in monkey auditory cortex: effects of frequency separation, presentation rate, and tone duration. J Acoust Soc Am 116:1656–1670. doi:10.1121/1.1778903
Gentner TQ, Hulse SH (2000) Female European starling preference and choice for variation in conspecific male song. Anim Behav 59:443–458. doi:10.1006/anbe.1999.1313
Gentner TQ, Margoliash D (2003) Neuronal populations and single cells representing learned auditory objects. Nature 424:669–674. doi:10.1038/nature01731
George I, Cousillas H (2013) How social experience shapes song representation in the brain of starlings. J Physiol Paris 107:170–177. doi:10.1016/j.jphysparis.2012.12.002
Gleich O (1989) Auditory primary afferents in the starling – correlation of function and morphology. Hear Res 37:255–267. doi:10.1016/0378-5955(89)90026-9
Gleich O, Klump GM (1995) Temporal modulation transfer functions in the European Starling (Sturnus vulgaris): II. Responses of auditory-nerve fibres. Hear Res 82:81–92. doi:10.1016/0378-5955(94)00168-P
Gleich O, Manley GA (1988) Quantitative morphological analysis of the sensory epithelium of the starling and pigeon basilar papilla. Hear Res 34:69–85. doi:10.1016/0378-5955(88)90052-4
Gleich O, Narins PM (1988) The phase response of primary auditory afferents in a songbird (Sturnus vulgaris L.). Hear Res 32:81–91. doi:10.1016/0378-5955(88)90148-7
Grimault N, Bacon SP, Micheyl C (2002) Auditory stream segregation onthe basis of amplitude-modulation rate. J Acoust Soc Am 111:1340–1348
Gutschalk A, Micheyl C, Oxenham AJ, Wilson EC, Melcher JR (2008) Neural correlates of auditory perceptual awareness under informational masking. PLoS Biol 6(6):e138. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0060138
Hall JW, Haggard MP, Fernandes MA (1984) Detection in noise by spectro-temporal pattern analysis. J Acoust Soc Am 76:50–56. doi:10.1121/1.391005
Hartmann WM, Johnson D (1991) Stream segregation and peripheral channeling. Music Percept 9:155–184. doi:10.2307/40285527
Hausberger M, Bigot E, Clergeau P (2008) Dialect use in large assemblies: a study in European starling Sturnus vulgaris roosts. J Avian Biol 39:672–682. doi:10.1111/j.1600-048X.2008.04307.x
Hofer SB, Klump GM (2003) Within- and across-channel processing in auditory masking: a physiological study in the songbird forebrain. J Neurosci 23:5732–5739. doi:10.1037/a0030185
Hose B, Langner G, Scheich H (1987) Topographic representation of periodicities in the forebrain of the mynah bird: one map for pitch and rhythm? Brain Res 422:367–373. doi:10.1016/0006-8993(87)90946-2
Hulse SH (2002) Auditory scene analysis in animal communication. In: Slater PJB, Rosenblatt JS, Snowdon CT et al (eds) Advances in the study of behavior, vol 31. Academic, San Diego, pp 163–200. doi:10.1016/S0065-3454(02)80008-0
Itatani N, Klump GM (2009) Auditory streaming of amplitude-modulated sounds in the songbird forebrain. J Neurophysiol 101:3212–3225. doi:10.1152/jn.91333.2008
Itatani N, Klump GM (2011) Neural correlates of auditory streaming of harmonic complex sounds with different phase relations in the songbird forebrain. J Neurophysiol 105:188–199. doi:10.1152/jn.00496.2010
Itatani N, Klump GM (2014) Neural correlates of auditory streaming in an objective behavioral task. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:10738–10743. doi:10.1073/pnas.1321487111
Jeanne JM, Thompson JV, Sharpee TO, Gentner TQ (2011) Emergence of learned categorical representations within an auditory forebrain circuit. J Neurosci 31:2595–2606. doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3930-10.2011
Khouri L, Nelken I (2015) Detecting the unexpected. Curr Opin Neurobiol 35:142–147. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2015.08.003
Klump GM, Langemann U (1995) Comodulation masking release in a songbird. Hear Res 87:157–164. doi:10.1016/0378-5955(95)00087-K
Klump GM, Larsen ON (1992) Azimuth sound localization in the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris): I. Physical binaural cues. J Comp Physiol A 170:243–251
Klump GM, Nieder A (2001) Release from masking in fluctuating background noise is represented in a songbird’s auditory forebrain. Neuroreport 12:1825–1829. doi:10.1046/j.0953-816x.2001.01465.x
Klump GM, Fichtel C, Hamann I, Langemann U (1999) Filling in the gap: evidence for apparent continuity in the songbird auditory system. ARO Midwinter Research Meeting, Abstract 108
Klump GM, Langemann U, Friebe A, Hamann I (2001) An animal model for studying across-channel processes: CMR and MDI in the European starling. In: Breebart DJ, Houtsma AJM, Kohlrausch A, Prijs VF, Schoonhoven R (eds) Physiological and psychophysical bases of auditory function. Shaker Publishing BV, Maastricht, pp. 266–272
Knipschild M, Dörrscheidt GJ, Rübsamen R (1992) Setting complex tasks to single units in the avian auditory forebrain. I: Processing of complex artificial stimuli. Hear Res 57:216–230. doi:10.1016/0378-5955(92)90153-E
Knudsen DP, Gentner TQ (2013) Active recognition enhances the representation of behaviorally relevant information in single auditory forebrain neurons. J Neurophysiol 109:1690–1703. doi:10.1152/jn.00461.2012
Kobayasi KI, Usami A, Riquimaroux H (2012) Behavioral evidence for auditory induction in a species of rodent: Mongolian gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus). J Acoust Soc Amer 132:4063–4068. doi:10.1121/1.4763546
Langemann U, Klump GM (2001) Signal detection in amplitude-modulated maskers: I. Behavioral auditory threshold in a songbird. Eur J Neurosci 13:1025–1032. doi:10.1046/j.0953-816x.2001.01464.x
Langemann U, Klump GM (2007) Detecting modulated signals in modulated noise: (I) behavioural auditory thresholds in a songbird. Eur J Neurosci 26:1969–1978. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05804.x
MacDougall-Shackleton SA, Hulse SH, Gentner TQ, White W (1998) Auditory scene analysis by European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris): perceptual segregation of tone sequences. J Acoust Soc Am 103:3581–3587. doi:10.1121/1.423063
Maier EH, Klump GM (1990) Auditory duration discrimination in the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris). J Acoust Soc Am 88:616–621. doi:10.1121/1.399765
McFadden D (1987) Comodulation detection differences using noise-band signals. J Acoust Soc Am 81:1519–1527. doi:10.1121/1.394504
Micheyl C, Oxenham AJ (2010) Objective and subjective psychophysical measures of auditory stream integration and segregation. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 11:709–724. doi:10.1007/s10162-010-0227-2
Micheyl C, Tian B, Carlyon RP, Rauschecker JP (2005) Perceptual organization of tone sequences in the auditory cortex of awake Macaques. Neuron 48:139–148. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2005.08.039
Mill RW, Bőhm TM, Bendixen A, Winkler I, Denham SL (2013) Modelling the emergence and dynamics of perceptual organisation in auditory streaming. PLoS Comput Biol 9:e1002925. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002925
Miller CT, Dibble E, Hauser MD (2001) Amodal completion of acoustic signals by a nonhuman primate. Nat Neurosci 4:783–784. doi:10.1038/90481
Moore BCJ, Gockel H (2002) Factors influencing sequential stream segregation. Acta Acust/Acust 88:320–333
Moore BCJ, Gockel H (2012) Properties of auditory stream formation. Phil Trans R Soc B 367:919–931. doi:10.1098/rstb.2011.0355
Mountjoy DJ, Lemon RE (1996) Female choice for complex song in the European starling: a field experiment. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 38:65–71. doi:10.1007/s002650050218
Näätänen R, Jacobsen T, Winkler I (2005) Memory-based or afferent processes in mismatch negativity (MMN): a review of the evidence. Psychophysiology 42:25–32. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2005.00256.x
Nelken I, Rotman Y, Bar Yosef O (1999) Responses of auditory-cortex neurons to structural features of natural sounds. Nature 397:154–157. doi:10.1038/16456
Nieder A, Klump GM (2001) Signal detection in amplitude-modulated maskers: II. Processing in the songbird’s auditory forebrain. Eur J Neurosci 13:1033–1044
Petkov C, Sutter M (2011) Evolutionary conservation and neuronal mechanisms of auditory perceptual restoration. Hear Res 271:54–65. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2010.05.011
Petkov CI, O’Connor KN, Sutter ML (2003) Illusory sound perception in macaque monkeys. J Neurosci 23:9155–9161
Petkov CI, O’Connor KN, Sutter ML (2007) Encoding of illusory continuity in primary auditory cortex. Neuron 54:153–165. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.02.031
Pressnitzer D, Sayles M, Micheyl C, Winter IM (2008) Perceptual organization of sound begins in the auditory periphery. Curr Biol 18:1124–1128. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2008.06.053
Roberts B, Glasberg BR, Moore BCJ (2002) Primitive stream segregation of tone sequences without differences in fundamental frequency or passband. J Acoust Soc Am 112:2074–2085. doi:10.1121/1.1508784
Römer H (2013) Masking by noise in acoustic insects: problems and solutions. In: Brumm H (ed) Animal communication and noise. Animal signals and communication. Springer, New York, pp 33–63. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-41494-7_3
Rübsamen R, Dörrscheidt GJ (1986) Tonotopic organization of the auditory forebrain in a songbird, the European starling. J Comp Physiol A 158:639–664. doi:10.1007/BF00603820
Samuel AG (1996) Does lexical information influence the perceptual restoration of phonemes? J Exp Psychol Gen 125:28–51. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.125.1.28
Schooneveldt GP, Moore BC (1987) Comodulation masking release (CMR): effects of signal frequency, flanking-band frequency, masker bandwidth, flanking-band level, and monotic versus dichotic presentation of the flanking band. J Acoust Soc Am 82:1944–1956. doi:10.1121/1.395639
Schooneveldt GP, Moore BC (1989) Comodulation masking release (CMR) as a function of masker bandwidth, modulator bandwidth, and signal duration. J Acoust Soc Am 85:273–281. doi:10.1121/1.397734
Schwartz JJ, Huth K, Jones SH, Brown R, Marks J, Yang XL (2010) Tests for call restoration in the gray treefrog Hyla versicolor. Bioacoustics 20:59–86. doi:10.1080/09524622.2011.9753633
Seeba F, Klump GM (2009) Stimulus familiarity affects perceptual restoration in the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris). PLoS One 4:e5974. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005974
Seeba F, Schwartz JJ, Bee MA (2010) Testing an auditory illusion in frogs: perceptual restoration or sensory bias? Anim Behav 79:1317–1328. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.03.004
Shamma SA, Micheyl C (2010) Behind the scenes of auditory perception. Curr Opin Neurobiol 20:361–366. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2010.03.009
Singh NC, Theunissen FE (2003) Modulation spectra of natural sounds and ethological theories of auditory processing. J Acoust Soc Am 114:3394–3411. doi:10.1121/1.1624067
Soha JA, Peters S (2015) Vocal learning in songbirds and humans: a retrospective in honor of Peter Marler. Ethology 121:933–945. doi:10.1111/eth.12415
Stainsby TH, Moore BC, Medland PJ, Glasberg BR (2004) Sequential streaming and effective level differences due to phase-spectrum manipulations. J Acoust Soc Am 115:1665–1673. doi:10.1121/1.1650288
Sugita Y (1997) Neuronal correlates of auditory induction in the cat cortex. Neuroreport 8:1155–1159
Theunissen FE, Elie JE (2014) Neural processing of natural sounds. Nat Rev Neurosci 15:355–366. doi:10.1038/nrn3731
Thompson JV, Gentner TQ (2010) Song recognition learning and stimulus-specific weakening of neural responses in the avian auditory forebrain. J Neurophysiol 103:1785–1797. doi:10.1152/jn.00885.2009
Todt D, Naguib M (2000) Vocal interactions in birds: the use of song as a model in communication. In: Slater PJB, Rosenblatt JS, Snowdon CT; et al (eds) Advances in the study of behavior, vol 29. Academic, San Diego, pp 247–296. doi:10.1016/S0065-3454(08)60107-2
Ulanovsky N, Las L, Farkas D, Nelken I (2004) Multiple time scales of adaptation in auditory cortex neurons. J Neurosci 24:10440–10453. doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1905-04.2004
van Noorden LPAS (1975) Temporal coherence in the perception of tone sequences. PhD Dissertation, Technical University Eindhoven
van Rossum MW (2001) A novel spike distance. Neur Compu 13:751–763. doi:10.1162/089976601300014321
Vélez A, Bee MA (2011) Dip listening and the cocktail party problem in grey treefrogs: signal recognition in temporally fluctuating noise. Anim Behav 82:1319–1327. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.09.015
Verhey JL, Pressnitzer D, Winter IM (2003) The psychophysics and physiology of comodulation masking release. Exp Brain Res 153:405–417. doi:10.1007/s00221-003-1607-1
von der Behrens W, Bauerle P, Kossl M, Gaese BH (2009) Correlating stimulus-specific adaptation of cortical neurons and local field potentials in the awake rat. J Neurosci 29:13837–13849. doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3475-09.2009
Warren RM (2008) Auditory perception: an analysis and synthesis, Third edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511754777
Wiley RH, Richards DG (1978) Physical constraints on acoustic communication in the atmosphere: Implications for the evolution of animal vocalizations. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 3:69–94. doi:10.1093/beheco/arv204
Winkler I, Denham S, Mill R, Bohm TM, Bendixen A (2012) Multistability in auditory stream segregation: a predictive coding view. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 367:1001–1012. doi:10.1098/rstb.2011.0359
Zelick RD, Narins PM (1982) Analysis of acoustically evoked call suppression behavior in a neotropical treefrog. Anim Behav 30:728–733. doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(82)80144-9
Acknowledgments
The starling studies were funded by grants from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB/TRR31, FOR 306, GRK 591) and by a grant from the National Science Foundation (INT-0107304, postdoctoral fellowships to M. A. Bee). I thank the editors for their feedback on a previous version of the chapter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Klump, G.M. (2016). Perceptual and Neural Mechanisms of Auditory Scene Analysis in the European Starling. In: Bee, M., Miller, C. (eds) Psychological Mechanisms in Animal Communication. Animal Signals and Communication, vol 5. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48690-1_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48690-1_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-48688-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-48690-1
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)