Advertisement

Rational Policy Decision-Making: Idealism Versus Realism

  • Madrean Schober
Chapter
  • 750 Downloads
Part of the Advanced Practice in Nursing book series (APN)

Abstract

As a concept, rational decision-making can be viewed as a multi-step process, from problem identification through solution, for making logically sound decisions. Rational decision-making favors objective data and a formal process over subjectivity and insight, making an assumption that the decision-maker has all relevant data about alternative choices and solutions. This concept also assumes that decision-makers have the time, intellectual ability, and resources to evaluate each choice against others. This chapter discusses the characteristics of a rational approach to policy decision-making and identifies a rational approach model in making policy decisions. The rational approach to making policy decisions is compared to the theory of step-by-step or incremental decision-making. In addition, disjointed incrementalism is discussed in exploring the perspective of what influence that unexpected or unforeseen results may have on the policymaking process.

Keywords

Rational decision-making Incrementalism Disjointed incrementalism Alternative choices Unanticipated consequences 

References

  1. Boundless. “Rational Decision Making.” Boundless Management. Boundless, 26 May 2016. Retrieved 20 Oct 2016 from: https://www.boundless.com/management/textbooks/boundless-management-textbook/decision-making-10/rational-and-nonrational-decision-making-76/rational-decision-making-369-8376/
  2. Cairney P, Heikkila T (2014) A comparison of theories of the policy process. In: Sabatier PA, Weible CM (eds) Theories of the policy process, 3rd edn. Boulder, Westview Press, pp 363–390Google Scholar
  3. Dror Y (1989) Public policy making re-examined. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick and OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. Kingdon JW (2003) Agendas, alternatives, and public policies, 2nd edn. Longman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Lindblom CF (1959) The science of muddling through. Public Adm Rev 19:79–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Lindblom CF (1979) Still muddling, not yet through. Public Adm Rev 39:517–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Mason D, Leavitt J, Chaffee M (2007) Policy and politics: a framework for action. In: Mason D, Leavitt J, Chaffee M (eds) Policy and Politics in nursing and health care. Elsevier, St. Louis, pp 1–11Google Scholar
  8. McGrew A, Wilson M (1982) Decision making. Manchester University Press, ManchesterGoogle Scholar
  9. Porche DJ (2012) Health policy: application for nurses and other healthcare professionals. Jones & Bartlett, SudburyGoogle Scholar
  10. Sharkansky I (2002) Politics and policymaking. Boulder, Westview PressGoogle Scholar
  11. Walt G (2006) Health policy: an introduction to process and power. Zed Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Weible CM (2014) Advancing policy process research. In: Sabatier PA, Weible CM (eds) Theories of the policy process, 3rd edn. Boulder, Westview Press, pp 391–407Google Scholar
  13. Zahariadis N (2014) Ambiguity and multiple streams. In: Sabatier PA, Weible CM (eds) Theories of the policy process, 3rd edn. Boulder, Westview Press, pp 25–58Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Madrean Schober
    • 1
  1. 1.Schober Global Healthcare ConsultingIndianapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations