Skip to main content

A Generic Framework for Context-Aware Process Performance Analysis

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2016 Conferences (OTM 2016)

Abstract

Process mining combines model-based process analysis with data-driven analysis techniques. The role of process mining is to extract knowledge and gain insights from event logs. Most existing techniques focus on process discovery (the automated extraction of process models) and conformance checking (aligning observed and modeled behavior). Relatively little research has been performed on the analysis of business process performance. Cooperative business processes often exhibit a high degree of variability and depend on many factors. Finding root causes for inefficiencies such as delays and long waiting times in such flexible processes remains an interesting challenge. This paper introduces a novel approach to analyze key process performance indicators by considering the process context. A generic context-aware analysis framework is presented that analyzes performance characteristics from multiple perspectives. A statistical approach is then utilized to evaluate and find significant differences in the results. Insights obtained can be used for finding high-impact points for optimization, prediction, and monitoring. The practical relevance of the approach is shown in a case study using real-life data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    \(\mathcal {P}(\mathcal {E})\) denotes the powerset over \(\mathcal {E}\), i.e. all possible subsets of \(\mathcal {E}\).

  2. 2.

    See http://promtools.org.

References

  1. van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Business process simulation revisited. In: Barjis, J. (ed.) Enterprise and Organizational Modeling and Simulation. LNBIP, vol. 63, pp. 1–14. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Process Mining - Data Science in Action. Springer, Heidelberg (2016)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. van der Aalst, W.M.P., Adriansyah, A., van Dongen, B.F.: Replaying history on process models for conformance checking and performance analysis. Wiley Interdisc. Rev. Data Mining Knowl. Disc. 2(2), 182–192 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. van der Aalst, W.M.P., Schonenberg, M.H., Song, M.: Time prediction based on process mining. Inf. Syst. 36(2), 450–475 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bevacqua, A., Carnuccio, M., Folino, F., Guarascio, M., Pontieri, L.: A data-driven prediction framework for analyzing and monitoring business process performances. In: Hammoudi, S., Cordeiro, J., Maciaszek, L.A., Filipe, J. (eds.) Enterprise Information Systems. LNBIP, vol. 190, pp. 100–117. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bolt, A., Sepúlveda, M.: Process remaining time prediction using query catalogs. In: Lohmann, N., Song, M., Wohed, P. (eds.) BPM 2013. LNBIP, vol. 171, pp. 54–65. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-06257-0_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Jagadeesh Chandra Bose, R.P., Aalst, W.: Trace alignment in process mining: opportunities for process diagnostics. In: Hull, R., Mendling, J., Tai, S. (eds.) BPM 2010. LNCS, vol. 6336, pp. 227–242. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-15618-2_17

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Box, G.E., Cox, D.R.: An analysis of transformations. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B (Methodological) 26(2), 211–252 (1964)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. da Cunha Mattos, T., Santoro, F.M., Revoredo, K., Nunes, V.T.: A formal representation for context-aware business processes. Comput. Ind. 65(8), 1193–1214 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. del-Río-Ortega, A., Resinas, M., Cabanillas, C., Cortés, A.R.: On the definition and design-time analysis of process performance indicators. Inf. Syst. 38(4), 470–490 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. van Dongen, B.F.: BPI challenge 2012 (2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.4121/uuid:3926db30-f712-4394-aebc-75976070e91f

  12. Dongen, B.F., Crooy, R.A., Aalst, W.M.P.: Cycle time prediction: when will this case finally be finished? In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds.) OTM 2008. LNCS, vol. 5331, pp. 319–336. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-88871-0_22

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Folino, F., Guarascio, M., Pontieri, L.: Context-aware predictions on business processes: an ensemble-based solution. In: Appice, A., Ceci, M., Loglisci, C., Manco, G., Masciari, E., Ras, Z.W. (eds.) NFMCP 2012. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7765, pp. 215–229. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-37382-4_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Francescomarino, C.D., Dumas, M., Maggi, F.M., Teinemaa, I.: Clustering-based predictive process monitoring. CoRR abs/1506.01428 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ha, B.-H., Reijers, H.A., Bae, J., Bae, H.: An approximate analysis of expected cycle time in business process execution. In: Eder, J., Dustdar, S. (eds.) BPM 2006. LNCS, vol. 4103, pp. 65–74. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). doi:10.1007/11837862_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Hill, T., Lewicki, P.: Statistics: Methods and Applications: A Comprehensive Reference for Science, Industry, and Data Mining. StatSoft Inc., Tulsa (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hollander, M., Wolfe, D.A., Chicken, E.: Nonparametric Statistical Methods. Wiley, New York (2014)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. de Leoni, M., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Data-aware process mining: discovering decisions in processes using alignments. In: Shin, S.Y., Maldonado, J.C. (eds.) Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC 2013), Coimbra, Portugal, 18–22 March 2013, pp. 1454–1461. ACM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  19. de Leoni, M., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Dees, M.: A general process mining framework for correlating, predicting and clustering dynamic behavior based on event logs. Inf. Syst. 56, 235–257 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Maggi, F.M., Francescomarino, C., Dumas, M., Ghidini, C.: Predictive monitoring of business processes. In: Jarke, M., Mylopoulos, J., Quix, C., Rolland, C., Manolopoulos, Y., Mouratidis, H., Horkoff, J. (eds.) CAiSE 2014. LNCS, vol. 8484, pp. 457–472. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-07881-6_31

    Google Scholar 

  21. Marques de Sá, J.P.: Applied Statistics Using SPSS, STATISTICA, MATLAB and R. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Pravilovic, S., Appice, A., Malerba, D.: Process mining to forecast the future of running cases. In: Appice, A., Ceci, M., Loglisci, C., Manco, G., Masciari, E., Ras, Z.W. (eds.) NFMCP 2013. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8399, pp. 67–81. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-08407-7_5

    Google Scholar 

  23. Razali, N.M., Wah, Y.B.: Power comparisons of Shapiro-Wilk, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Lilliefors and Anderson-Darling tests. J. Stat. Model. Analytics 2(1), 21–33 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rogge-Solti, A., Weske, M.: Prediction of remaining service execution time using stochastic petri nets with arbitrary firing delays. In: Basu, S., Pautasso, C., Zhang, L., Fu, X. (eds.) ICSOC 2013. LNCS, vol. 8274, pp. 389–403. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-45005-1_27

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Shapiro, S.S., Wilk, M.B.: An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 52(3/4), 591–611 (1965)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Tukey, J.W.: Comparing individual means in the analysis of variance. Biometrics 5(2), 99–114 (1949)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bart F. A. Hompes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hompes, B.F.A., Buijs, J.C.A.M., van der Aalst, W.M.P. (2016). A Generic Framework for Context-Aware Process Performance Analysis. In: Debruyne, C., et al. On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2016 Conferences. OTM 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10033. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48472-3_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48472-3_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-48471-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-48472-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics